Page 1 of 5

Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 1:41 pm
by Duckman
RIP.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:02 pm
by Moonchesteri
What myth is that?

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:04 pm
by PeterParker
Moonchesteri wrote:What myth is that?


That he is a striker, good at darts.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:06 pm
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Beyond shite today, yet again. It can't help what's going on inside him with the ructions in central defence but Kolarov should start in front of him every time these days.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:09 pm
by Esky
Constantly makes mistakes in defense and my heart sinks whenever he's played in near the opposition's box. He's entered that Wayne Bridge phase where I'm not sure what, if anything, he actually contributes.

Any outstanding EDS fullbacks that could be promoted anytime soon? If not, it's a position that will need to be addressed going forward.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:20 pm
by Duckman
Moonchesteri wrote:What myth is that?


That he is good at defending.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:22 pm
by Blue In Bolton
How has Greg Leigh been getting on at Crewe? Surely has to be a better option nowadays.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:26 pm
by Moonchesteri
Duckman wrote:
Moonchesteri wrote:What myth is that?


That he is good at defending.


Ah. Thought that was buried ages ago. The Only quality he has over Kola is pace.but that doesn't make him a better defender and let's not even start on the attacking qualities

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:57 pm
by South Stand Balti
Clichy is at his best when he plays week in and week out. He always looks indecisive and out of sorts when he is in and out of the team.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:48 pm
by Goaters 103
Poor today, but then again so was Kompany. And Toure. And Zabaleta. And Navas. And Aguero. And Fernando. And Dzeko. And most of all Pellegrini.

Do they all have a myth about them as well?

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 4:55 pm
by City64
Clichy is having a very poor season .

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:44 pm
by blues2win
Fat Sam says ' Mangala's just come in and they're not protecting him. You can get players down the side of him with the space that Clichy leaves'. We haven't got a good defensive full back so we need Milner on that side to protect the space. That will benefit Mangala. In my view Kolarov should be favoured now because he offers far more attacking threat. We have a very promising young EDS left back in Angelino but he's probably two years off the first team. I would buy an older experienced left back who knows how to defend and get rid of Clichy to be honest.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 10:45 pm
by Douglas Higginbottom
Blue In Bolton wrote:How has Greg Leigh been getting on at Crewe? Surely has to be a better option nowadays.



No he most definitely is not.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 12:21 am
by horlock2000
So Clichy is the scapegoat then?. Despite the fact Yaya has been absolutely woeful, week in, week out. Fernando is looking half the player he was before his injury and dont get me started on Navas.

Clichy has been at his best but, as mentioned above, we need a settles back four and by constantly changing it, Pellegini is asking for trouble.

For me, Clichy is still our best option "defensively".

There is a very exciting young LD in the EDS by the way.... Called Angelino, looks a very exciting prospect but not ready for 1st team yet.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:05 am
by Blue In Bolton
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Blue In Bolton wrote:How has Greg Leigh been getting on at Crewe? Surely has to be a better option nowadays.



No he most definitely is not.


Thanks for that Doug. I am just dismayed at how far Clichy has regressed in his performances for the last couple of seasons and was probably a knee jerk reaction but he is fast becoming a liability.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:44 am
by Ted Hughes
Most games I've seen, Zabba has been as bad or worse than Clichy but is immune to criticism.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:51 am
by Douglas Higginbottom
Blue In Bolton wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Blue In Bolton wrote:How has Greg Leigh been getting on at Crewe? Surely has to be a better option nowadays.



No he most definitely is not.


Thanks for that Doug. I am just dismayed at how far Clichy has regressed in his performances for the last couple of seasons and was probably a knee jerk reaction but he is fast becoming a liability.


Angelino is certainly a future possible left back but his strength is definitely his attacking play rather than defensive. At right back I think we have an even better prospect in Pablo Maffeo who I think is top class defensively and in recent games has been playing centre back even though he is quite a small lad.

My take on Clichy is that he might be marginally better than Kolarov defensively but not enough to make him first choice.On Saturday though he was awful with an assist for their first goal with his shocking positioning and then some appalling passes to make iut a really bad game for him.

Zaba isn't the greatest defender but such a 100% player he does get away with things helped of course by his attacking play and great link ups with Silva,Milner and Yaya especially. His main weakness is his speed which did get shown up once badly on Saturday but can often be seen when he has to chase back when attacking and out of position.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:33 am
by blues2win
Soriano stressed that the Club are looking three years ahead with their transfer policy. That should surely include avoiding blocking the prospects of the outstanding talent now being nurtured by Vieira. If we do get rid of Clichy we shouldn't buy a young talent which would wreck the prospects of Angelino. Ditto at Right Back where Sagna was a good buy on a free but also because he won't block Maffeo who as Doug suggests is probably a year ahead of Angelino in his development.

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 2:49 pm
by Nick
please can we play our most in form CB in MDM until we are settled..

mangala is starting to shit me up like savic did

Re: Demise of the "Clichy"myth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:36 pm
by Mikhail Chigorin
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Blue In Bolton wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Blue In Bolton wrote:How has Greg Leigh been getting on at Crewe? Surely has to be a better option nowadays.



No he most definitely is not.


Thanks for that Doug. I am just dismayed at how far Clichy has regressed in his performances for the last couple of seasons and was probably a knee jerk reaction but he is fast becoming a liability.


Angelino is certainly a future possible left back but his strength is definitely his attacking play rather than defensive. At right back I think we have an even better prospect in Pablo Maffeo who I think is top class defensively and in recent games has been playing centre back even though he is quite a small lad.

My take on Clichy is that he might be marginally better than Kolarov defensively but not enough to make him first choice.On Saturday though he was awful with an assist for their first goal with his shocking positioning and then some appalling passes to make iut a really bad game for him.

Zaba isn't the greatest defender but such a 100% player he does get away with things helped of course by his attacking play and great link ups with Silva,Milner and Yaya especially. His main weakness is his speed which did get shown up once badly on Saturday but can often be seen when he has to chase back when attacking and out of position.


Thanks for mentioning this youngster Mr. H.

I don't think it necessarily follows that, just because someone is smaller, they wouldn't be any good, at PL level, in the centre-back role.

If it's the aerial 'warfare' aspect that gives concern, I think that a lack of inches can be somewhat minimised by the timing of the jump and the 'spring' that the defender can bring to the climb (years ago, I'm thinking of Ian Ross for Liverfool).

It's harder to leap higher from a standing start but, when just defending set pieces, taller players in the side could be detailed to mark the opposition's big so-and so's in those situations.

On the plus side, a smaller player might be faster, more mobile and more agile and, in this way, bring other attributes to the defence.

It'll be interesting to watch Maffeo's progress and what position he eventually ends up playing.