phips wrote:ruralblue wrote:phips wrote:Michigan Blue wrote:phips wrote:i merely said if we're making fun of Wenger for his constant complaining then we can't not be upset with Pellegrini.
every other manager shouldn't complain in the media but our's can? thats hypocritical.
Pellegrini is pure class and almost never has a whinge. It takes something diabolical to bring it out of him.
In contrast, Wenger, Brenda, Maureen, etc. are gobshites, and spout shit constantly.
Are you following?
read you loud and clear champ. but the frequency shouldn't have an effect--still hypocritical.
Are you on crack?
If Pellegrini shows how unhappy about decisions when he is not one to moan just goes to show how fucked up the ref was today. Does NOT make him a hypocrite at all.
Jesus you really need to wobble your head. First of all we score a goal on the break and you say we don't deserve it. Now this.
How old are you and of what mental capacity?
Jesus Christ. learn to read. I'm not calling him a hypocrite. I'm calling everyone in this thread agreeing that Manuel should complain a hypocrite.
and yes, we deserved the goal given the quality of the counter. but given that we had done fuck all in the match up to that point and Arsenal were bossing midfield and possession we didn't deserve the goal given what had transpired thus far.
try taking off the blue-tinted glasses and putting down the foam finger and losing the bias. try being objective for once.
my word. and you question my mental capacity….shit..
You see Phips, it's not exactly what you say but the way you say it and the very contrary way you go about your business on here, near enough on every subject.
You say we're hypocritical for supporting what the manager says. Well get that, City fans supporting the City manager. The difference here is that managers like Wenger and Mourinho whinge every single week, and only see things that go against them, whereas Pellers, 99 times out of 100, keeps his counsel and very rarely complains. In this case, City fans are backing him because it is exactly how we all seen it so therefore it's only right that we back his claims. That is in no way hypocritical and if the likes of Wenger or Mourinho had the same treatment in a game then I'd suggest most would back them as well.
You also say that we 'Didn't deserve the goal', but how does that work? I don't go by the well worded media script that just because you have less possession then you shouldn't be able to score. We'd soaked up lots of pressure and were looking to play on the break, the opportunity came and we took it with a well worked cross from Navas into a well placed run from Aguero. Why is that 'Not Deserved'? As we then took control of the game, had better possession and more shots on target, does that mean that Arsenal didn't deserve to score their 2 goals or was it just the nature of play with a large helping hand from a referee that you could either call a homer or one that I believe has already considered the result?
Like I say Phips, I don't see you as taking the Blue Tints off, I see you just being contrary for the sake of it otherwise you'd probably accept that a manager is able to complain as long as he has a genuine grievance. And in this case, I believe he had every justification.
