Im_Spartacus wrote:The Hull situation shows how fucking wrong the system is. Hull invest to get promoted, and the following season or two will make that investment back in spades through premier league tv money, yet they are penalised for having the temerity to do well in a domestic competition the year after they are promoted.
Hull invested in their business, and like any investment, the return comes in the years following that investment. FFP completely undermines sound business strategy.
That absolutely fucking stinks, and is NOT what FFP was supposed to be about. I can understand them going for us, but this is pathetic. This absolutely proves beyond doubt that all the rules are there to do, as we have said all along, is to stop new owners investing in their clubs, and as such is clearly anti-competetive.
Beefymcfc wrote:Im_Spartacus wrote:The Hull situation shows how fucking wrong the system is. Hull invest to get promoted, and the following season or two will make that investment back in spades through premier league tv money, yet they are penalised for having the temerity to do well in a domestic competition the year after they are promoted.
Hull invested in their business, and like any investment, the return comes in the years following that investment. FFP completely undermines sound business strategy.
That absolutely fucking stinks, and is NOT what FFP was supposed to be about. I can understand them going for us, but this is pathetic. This absolutely proves beyond doubt that all the rules are there to do, as we have said all along, is to stop new owners investing in their clubs, and as such is clearly anti-competetive.
Sorry to say, and as you know, that is exactly what FFP is about, stopping the upstart in its tracks, not allowing for them to dream. The PL FFP on top made it near impossible for those dreams to be realised.
Im_Spartacus wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Im_Spartacus wrote:The Hull situation shows how fucking wrong the system is. Hull invest to get promoted, and the following season or two will make that investment back in spades through premier league tv money, yet they are penalised for having the temerity to do well in a domestic competition the year after they are promoted.
Hull invested in their business, and like any investment, the return comes in the years following that investment. FFP completely undermines sound business strategy.
That absolutely fucking stinks, and is NOT what FFP was supposed to be about. I can understand them going for us, but this is pathetic. This absolutely proves beyond doubt that all the rules are there to do, as we have said all along, is to stop new owners investing in their clubs, and as such is clearly anti-competetive.
Sorry to say, and as you know, that is exactly what FFP is about, stopping the upstart in its tracks, not allowing for them to dream. The PL FFP on top made it near impossible for those dreams to be realised.
The crazy thing is, if you get relegated from the premier league, and have a specific strategy to run a deficit for 2 seasons to try and get promoted, and you happen to qualify for Europe through a cup competition, you get fucking nailed for it.
I can understand them going after us, but the realities of the likes of hull getting caught up in this should now really be hitting home for clubs and the penny should be dropping with journalists who keep ignoring the clear issue with the legislation.
Im_Spartacus wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Im_Spartacus wrote:The Hull situation shows how fucking wrong the system is. Hull invest to get promoted, and the following season or two will make that investment back in spades through premier league tv money, yet they are penalised for having the temerity to do well in a domestic competition the year after they are promoted.
Hull invested in their business, and like any investment, the return comes in the years following that investment. FFP completely undermines sound business strategy.
That absolutely fucking stinks, and is NOT what FFP was supposed to be about. I can understand them going for us, but this is pathetic. This absolutely proves beyond doubt that all the rules are there to do, as we have said all along, is to stop new owners investing in their clubs, and as such is clearly anti-competetive.
Sorry to say, and as you know, that is exactly what FFP is about, stopping the upstart in its tracks, not allowing for them to dream. The PL FFP on top made it near impossible for those dreams to be realised.
The crazy thing is, if you get relegated from the premier league, and have a specific strategy to run a deficit for 2 seasons to try and get promoted, and you happen to qualify for Europe through a cup competition, you get fucking nailed for it.
I can understand them going after us, but the realities of the likes of hull getting caught up in this should now really be hitting home for clubs and the penny should be dropping with journalists who keep ignoring the clear issue with the legislation.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I wonder that, should this court case go in favour of the Fat Frenchman and his crooked cronies, they'll then feel even more determined to cut City to pieces by further, nefarious terms and conditions which they could introduce on a mere whim, at any time ??
Slim wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:I wonder that, should this court case go in favour of the Fat Frenchman and his crooked cronies, they'll then feel even more determined to cut City to pieces by further, nefarious terms and conditions which they could introduce on a mere whim, at any time ??
With the change to contracts I think they're doing it anyway.
However, I don't think Dupont can possibly lose this case.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Outcast, stupot and 428 guests