Wonderwall wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Agenda? What agenda LOL
Also IWT2012, that's a good post and I agree but I have a deep hatred of media machine and severely dislike how they are allowed to write blatant lies by inserting a fictitious "source" into the story.
It's the fact that they get away with it which gets to me.
Not to be a ponce about this kind of stuff as I do agree that we are not as well liked by certain folks in the media, but this person tweeting this seems to have his own agenda to prove "the agenda" against us. That quote from the Guardian about Nacho is taken out of context, and each quote is written by a different writer not the paper itself. The Nacho one is by Jacob Steinberg and the other about Martial by none other than City fan favourite, Jamie Jackson. Here's the more complete quote:
The newcomer wore the No72 shirt and Palace could have been forgiven for thinking that their team was out of the woods when he trotted on. Yet Iheanacho dragged them back in, maintaining City’s 100% record by stabbing in the rebound when Alex McCarthy was unable to hold Samir Nasri’s shot in the 90th minute.
Maybe the Nigerian, 19 next month, who was signed last year from Taye Academy in his home country, will never contribute anything of any significance again for City. He would not be the first youngster to fade into obscurity after such a dramatic introduction.
Iheanacho does not even qualify for the B list for City’s Champions League campaign, which begins against Juventus at the Etihad Stadium on Tuesday, yet here was one of those moments that the leaders will look back on fondly if they lift the title in May. It was a goal that makes people talk of destiny, rather like United taking a huge step towards the title in April 2009 when Federico Macheda stepped off the bench to curl in a dramatic stoppage-time winner against Aston Villa.
I'm not sure what's wrong with what he says. He says "maybe" not that he "will" never contribute, etc.
Let's also be real. Nacho was far less discussed in the media than Martial at this point, who was also highly covered over the past two weeks, due to the astronomical fee Utd paid for him and the criticism surrounding the move.
Either way, the writer does not say Nacho will never contribute, so that is pure propaganda by this person tweeting. Sorry.
As for the Martial quote, A) it is by Jamie Jackson, B) all of what I wrote above also illustrates more reason their would be more coverage of his goal, which also as important as Nacho's goal was, also came in a 'istory derby against arch rival Liverpool from his first touch and shot on goal, as well as from a move that was quite impressive, and reminded some of the comparisons to Henry. I think it's not too surprising that it will be the top story.
I suspect Nacho's goal would have been more covered on another day, but we also have Chelsea's situation and Liverpool/Rogers watch going.
I feel we are receiving a lot of praise, as can be seen by MOTD comments on our match, where Nacho was hailed for his awareness and positioning given his age, as did we for winning the kind of game "champions" do.
We are still against the so-called 'istory of the English and European cartel so we are still outsiders, and of course disliked for other hypocritical reasons. In that way, I get it, and makes it all the more enjoyable when we silence them or make them have to heap praise on us.
Peace.