john@staustell wrote:Hart against Olympiacos:
Distribution awful. Another Kamikaze charge with the judgement of a bull elephant.
"Nasty old City drop England number 1"
Poor judgement on their second goal but apart from one poor kick out when he gave it straight to the opposition his distribution was good, released it quickly and accurately.
Bridge'srightfoot wrote:Why does he keep rushing out his goal? He is possibly one of the worst keepers I have seen at that, his timing and judgement are awful and have cost us many goals in the past. How many times does he need to rush out and fuck up before he stops doing it?
Stay on your fucking line Joe. He's a world class shot stopper but he's not a sweeper. Never has been and never will be.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Poor judgement on their second goal but apart from one poor kick out when he gave it straight to the opposition his distribution was good, released it quickly and accurately.
One wrong pass, how dare he!
but if we want a sweeper keeper then we must ditch Joe. He's not good enough at it and regularly gives goals away. As I said he's a world class shot stopper and he has far more chance of stopping the shot than he does of making the interception.dazby wrote:Maybe he should be. Maybe it's the City way to always be an outlet, always be available. Could have sworn I've heard that before. Oh that's right. It was from a City keeper who said it's the City way to always be an outlet, always be available.
Sideshow Bob wrote:Is there really an argument here? Imo pantillimon was a better keeper than joe. And willy is twice the keeper that panti was...
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:Is there really an argument here? Imo pantillimon was a better keeper than joe. And willy is twice the keeper that panti was...
So you reckon Mancini and subsequently Pellegrini were both wrong to play Hart ahead of Pants? The mind boggles.
Pantillimon has found his level now.
blues2win wrote:Any City keeper these days has to be able to play as a sort of sweeper as well as a shot stopper. Pellegrini wants to play a high line with early pressure on the Oppposition to produce quick turnover. That requires a modern goalkeeper who doesn't just stay on his line. Equally releasing the ball quickly and accurately is crucial if we are to hit teams when they're most vulnerable; at the end of an attack. If Joe can't manage that then Pellegrini now has a serious alternative. And if Willy gets in the team Joe may find it difficult to displace him. Game on. That's the way it should be.
hartfordsheartbeat wrote:Caballero Height 1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)
That is my only problem with him. Reminds me of Given in that he's just a bit small for the premier league.
Sideshow Bob wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Sideshow Bob wrote:Is there really an argument here? Imo pantillimon was a better keeper than joe. And willy is twice the keeper that panti was...
So you reckon Mancini and subsequently Pellegrini were both wrong to play Hart ahead of Pants? The mind boggles.
Pantillimon has found his level now.
Do you honestly believe ability and form are the only criteria at play? The mind boggles.
hartfordsheartbeat wrote:Caballero Height 1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)
That is my only problem with him. Reminds me of Given in that he's just a bit small for the premier league.
Original Dub wrote:hartfordsheartbeat wrote:Caballero Height 1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)
That is my only problem with him. Reminds me of Given in that he's just a bit small for the premier league.
A bit small for the premier league? What difference does the league make, the goal is the same size?
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, Outcast, stupot and 488 guests