Nigels Tackle wrote:catchment area advantage?!
that'll be on account of all the talent living in the english channel?
soton have a good record because
1. they have a good youth set up (coaching and scouting)
2. they give young players a chance - their financial situation up to the takeover forced them to
btw - lallana came through from bournemouth
ruralblue wrote:Could be larger catchment area or could be better scouting at younger ages. I know round here for some strange reason the kids get scouted at a very young age and there seems mass concentration on watching the 7 and 8 year old so and not so much 9, 10 or 11 year old kids. I have heard scouts say if kids aren't showing great skill by the time they are 8 then they would take make it. What then happens to late starters or maybe kids who don't gain confidence till a bit later on.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:catchment area advantage?!
that'll be on account of all the talent living in the english channel?
soton have a good record because
1. they have a good youth set up (coaching and scouting)
2. they give young players a chance - their financial situation up to the takeover forced them to
btw - lallana came through from bournemouth
Llana was 12 when he joined Southampton so can't agree with that.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:ruralblue wrote:Could be larger catchment area or could be better scouting at younger ages. I know round here for some strange reason the kids get scouted at a very young age and there seems mass concentration on watching the 7 and 8 year old so and not so much 9, 10 or 11 year old kids. I have heard scouts say if kids aren't showing great skill by the time they are 8 then they would take make it. What then happens to late starters or maybe kids who don't gain confidence till a bit later on.
That's absolutely horrible approach. Ages 6 to 12 are all about creating foundation for basic skill set like passing, shooting and running. Honing individual skills.That age group should NOT under any circumstance be about excellence on the pitch.
LookMumImOnMCF.net wrote:One thing I don't think anyone's mentioned is the fact that most (all?) of these players played for Southampton in lower divisions and from a quick check it doesn't look like many went on loan away for very long.
I think there's a lot to be said about progressing at your own club, perhaps in a league where there's less focus and pressure young player can concentrate on their game rather than having to adapt to the 3rd or 4th loan club before they turn 20.
From a club's perspective, it's got to be a lot harder to just chuck someone in the Prem too.
DoomMerchant wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:ruralblue wrote:Could be larger catchment area or could be better scouting at younger ages. I know round here for some strange reason the kids get scouted at a very young age and there seems mass concentration on watching the 7 and 8 year old so and not so much 9, 10 or 11 year old kids. I have heard scouts say if kids aren't showing great skill by the time they are 8 then they would take make it. What then happens to late starters or maybe kids who don't gain confidence till a bit later on.
That's absolutely horrible approach. Ages 6 to 12 are all about creating foundation for basic skill set like passing, shooting and running. Honing individual skills.That age group should NOT under any circumstance be about excellence on the pitch.
I disagree. My son is 8 and his coaches are Columbian and he's absolutely learning how to play the game. Shooting and passing and shit he already knows. He's learning about space and positioning and how to play one touch on the floor football. Next summer he will be in Columbia for a month at an academy there.
Basically his coach tells us that by age 13 if they don't have it they never will.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:ruralblue wrote:Could be larger catchment area or could be better scouting at younger ages. I know round here for some strange reason the kids get scouted at a very young age and there seems mass concentration on watching the 7 and 8 year old so and not so much 9, 10 or 11 year old kids. I have heard scouts say if kids aren't showing great skill by the time they are 8 then they would take make it. What then happens to late starters or maybe kids who don't gain confidence till a bit later on.
That's absolutely horrible approach. Ages 6 to 12 are all about creating foundation for basic skill set like passing, shooting and running. Honing individual skills.That age group should NOT under any circumstance be about excellence on the pitch.
I disagree. My son is 8 and his coaches are Columbian and he's absolutely learning how to play the game. Shooting and passing and shit he already knows. He's learning about space and positioning and how to play one touch on the floor football. Next summer he will be in Columbia for a month at an academy there.
Basically his coach tells us that by age 13 if they don't have it they never will.
For example Spanish Soccer Coaching Bible and some book about Ajax Academy coaching (can't remember the name unfortunately) spesifically says that kids shouldn't be bothered with complicated tactical things like passing to the space or more complicated off the ball movement than running in straight lines before age of 11. The way they see it is that kids have certain ages when they are sensitive to certain skills. That age should be all about running with the ball, dribbling, shooting and technique of passing (not tactics). Players should be encouraged to take on other players regardless if it's anyway usefull to the outcome of the game. Let the kids themselves figure it out what is usefull and what is not. If you do things when kids are not sensitive about it you will only teach them ways that are really hard to correct in the future.
By the age of 13 you can see which boys definitely do NOT have it. That is, I'd say, 40 to 50 % of the age group. That leaves you with massive pool of kids whose development is unpredictable at best, complete crap shoot at worst. I dare you to check boy level (roughly 14 to 17) national teams of any given country from the past even from major international tournaments and see for yourself how many of them made it to top. You will be shocked to find out that even in best teams you will only recognize couple of names. I've seen super talented youth players who never amounted anything and I've seen kids who never stood out at the age of 15 and turned out to be professional footballers.
Also, no one ever really "knows" passing and shooting. No one does it perfect. That goes from any three year old just starting out to Andrea Pirlo. Only sure thing I know about player development is that they have this deep inner feeling that they never are perfect on anything and keep on practising.
Wonderwall wrote:grass roots in this country are looking at moving way from competitive football and league tables until the age of 14. This approach has been the way they have done it in spain for many years. Its about letting the kids express themselves and not about results, there are pros and cons to both competitive and non competitive football. At least this way the parents might behave more.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Wonderwall wrote:grass roots in this country are looking at moving way from competitive football and league tables until the age of 14. This approach has been the way they have done it in spain for many years. Its about letting the kids express themselves and not about results, there are pros and cons to both competitive and non competitive football. At least this way the parents might behave more.
I think that is overreaction as well. Kids are not stupid and are competitive. The problem is more about coaches and to some extent parents who don't let kids improve themselves as individuals. Personal efforts are rarely encouraged and it's all about implementing some crappy "game plan" of some random coach who fancies himself as Jose Mourinho of U9 football. The "game plan" being that "pass it to that big lad who has strong shot". Taking competitive edge off the game will not really help this though. It's more about guy trying a dribble and failing miserably and coach saying "well done Timmy, next time it will happen".
Oh, and Under ten year old's shouldn't be thought the defend in classic sense at all. They should be thought to steal the ball though, preferably in opposition half.
Wonderwall wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Wonderwall wrote:grass roots in this country are looking at moving way from competitive football and league tables until the age of 14. This approach has been the way they have done it in spain for many years. Its about letting the kids express themselves and not about results, there are pros and cons to both competitive and non competitive football. At least this way the parents might behave more.
I think that is overreaction as well. Kids are not stupid and are competitive. The problem is more about coaches and to some extent parents who don't let kids improve themselves as individuals. Personal efforts are rarely encouraged and it's all about implementing some crappy "game plan" of some random coach who fancies himself as Jose Mourinho of U9 football. The "game plan" being that "pass it to that big lad who has strong shot". Taking competitive edge off the game will not really help this though. It's more about guy trying a dribble and failing miserably and coach saying "well done Timmy, next time it will happen".
Oh, and Under ten year old's shouldn't be thought the defend in classic sense at all. They should be thought to steal the ball though, preferably in opposition half.
I would personally remove offisdes in Junior football up to U14. The refereeing standard is piss poor and often the fat bloke who doesnt have linesman to help him will rarely move out of the centre circle and just guesses whether it was offside or not. This is often a cause of arguments on the football field at junior level. A good referee makes a big difference to how enjoyable a game can be for coaches and kids.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: belleebee, carolina-blue, gilford, Harry Dowd scored, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase and 644 guests