Page 28 of 28

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 6:49 pm
by Hazy2
Slavic is an example to us all, nice work .

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 11:53 pm
by PrezIke
Hazy2 wrote:Slavic is an example to us all, nice work .


I think this is partly why some are afraid to let Mangala go.

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2016 12:00 pm
by South Stand Balti
PrezIke wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Slavic is an example to us all, nice work .


I think this is partly why some are afraid to let Mangala go.

I tend to agree with both these posts, but do you think Savic could be a success week in, week out in the Prem?

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 4:12 am
by Saul Goodman
Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 5:55 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Saul Goodman wrote:Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something


Could it be saying that Deschamps hasn't seen Rami for a while so wanted to see first hand where he's at? This is just a warm up game after all.

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 6:17 am
by Dunnylad
PrezIke wrote:
Hazy2 wrote:Slavic is an example to us all, nice work .


I think this is partly why some are afraid to let Mangala go.

But you can throw Otamendi in as well with that sort of reasoning and there's plenty on here who have his bus fare home counted out! I think personally that the pair of them should be given a chance. As for Savic I think it was a confidence thing where he needed another club to rebuild his career, which he seems to have done, but no I don't regret him going as I doubt he would have achieved those heights if he'd have stopped.

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 12:02 am
by South Stand Balti
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something


Could it be saying that Deschamps hasn't seen Rami for a while so wanted to see first hand where he's at? This is just a warm up game after all.

I think the French coach has seen enough to know who can play and who can't. I think we have too.

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:46 am
by Saul Goodman
South Stand Balti wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something


Could it be saying that Deschamps hasn't seen Rami for a while so wanted to see first hand where he's at? This is just a warm up game after all.

I think the French coach has seen enough to know who can play and who can't. I think we have too.

Mangala on the bench again behind Koscielny and Rami

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 7:36 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
South Stand Balti wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something


Could it be saying that Deschamps hasn't seen Rami for a while so wanted to see first hand where he's at? This is just a warm up game after all.

I think the French coach has seen enough to know who can play and who can't. I think we have too.


So why then would he not have Rami ahead of Mangala on a regular basis? Rami hadn't been called up for 3 years until now.

Apparently he's starting Rami ahead of Mangala for balance. Koscielny is at his best on the left of the centre back pairing so Eli is essentially his back up.

Re: Elaquim Mangala

PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:16 am
by South Stand Balti
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Wow. In a full strength lineup (minus Griezmann) Rami, a late sub last week only after Varane was injured, started ahead of Mangala. Thats...saying something


Could it be saying that Deschamps hasn't seen Rami for a while so wanted to see first hand where he's at? This is just a warm up game after all.

I think the French coach has seen enough to know who can play and who can't. I think we have too.


So why then would he not have Rami ahead of Mangala on a regular basis? Rami hadn't been called up for 3 years until now.

Apparently he's starting Rami ahead of Mangala for balance. Koscielny is at his best on the left of the centre back pairing so Eli is essentially his back up.

It's strange that the coach picks a player who hasn't been called up for 3 years, ahead of Msngala who is s squad regular. I don't think he is just having a look at Rami though. The warm up games are an opportunity to form a centre back partnership.