MOTD - Media Bias Against City

[aaron bond]

It's going to be about Mario's attitude (plus how he should've been off), Mancini's misplaced loyalties and how Brom should've had 3 penalty's.

Then, they'll start having a pop at us.

Also, we have no team spirit.

[john68]

Who cares, we won. Only City fans can get negative over a win

What would you know? You are a raving loony.

[Chinners]

That might be true as well but my point stands

[john68]

That might be true as well but my point stands

Viagra?

[Moonchesteri]

Who cares, we won. Only City fans can get negative over a win

I don't think people are getting negative here (or maybe towards JL but that's another story). You just know that twats like Hansen will ONLY pick out the booking of Balo etc instead of focusing in our brilliant performance with 1 man down which is ridiculous. But I for example just laugh while I 'criticise/moan' about the BBC coverage.

[Mikhail Chigorin]

It's going to be about Mario's attitude (plus how he should've been off), Mancini's misplaced loyalties and how Brom should've had 3 penalty's.

Then, they'll start having a pop at us.

Also, we have no team spirit.

There'll also be some sarcastic comment/condemnation about all the money we've spent.

Thank goodness I no longer watch such a mundane, dross-riddled programme.

[spiny]

Bottom line is we played with 10 men for most of the game against an unbeaten team with home advantage and came back from 1-0 down to win 2-1. Great result. That is what history will show. MotD is the digital equivalent of old throw away chip shop news paper.

[Beefymcfc]

I've just heard that they are talking scarves and pies tonight, no need to mention the game.

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

I've just heard that they are talking scarves and pies tonight, no need to mention the game.

I'd imagine they'll concentrate on the fact that the price of a cup of tea at the Etihad is £2-50, and that this is an underhand way of getting around FFPR.

[Chinners]

Ha ha, was about to post something similar.

[Beefymcfc]

Anybody know the order tonight, I take it Spurs v Chelsea will be on near to the end. Rags 1st I think, 4-2 is a decent watch, us second or 3rd with West Ham.

[Peter Doherty (AGAIG)]

Chelsea on first, us second.

[Beefymcfc]

Chelsea on first, us second.

Eh, somebody said that the early game is never shown first. We were second to last the other week even though we beat a team that had not been beaten at home for 13 games. It was a very good game as well.

Wasn't this the infamous Halsey show, or no-show to be precise/

[Beefymcfc]

Does anybody find AVB in anyway interesting?

And there we go, 'Arry in for another star player who moves onto another PL club. Really?

[london blue 2]

Haha Harry has already said re Mata that "we felt at that time he'd come to Tottenham..."

[freshie]

Haha Harry has already said re Mata that "we felt at that time he'd come to Tottenham..."

I laughed at that. What a twat. Is there anyone the twitchy fuck hasn't tried to sign?!

[london blue 2]

Fair play to lineker as well calling our shearer for always going on about mario.

[King Kev]

I was hoping they would show (and talk about) the incident when Fortune clearly, and deliberately, handled the ball in the penalty area.

You know, when no penalty was given and the offending player was allowed to stay on the pitch?

Silly me.

[Londonblue1]

I was hoping they would show (and talk about) the incident when Fortune clearly, and deliberately, handled the ball in the penalty area.

You know, when no penalty was given and the offending player was allowed to stay on the pitch?

Silly me.

Just like the fulham one the ref had.a hard week.poor ref

[Dameerto]

Not even a mention of it - was really surprised myself.