King Kev wrote:Mick McCarthy criticizing Vincent Kompany is like Cher Lloyd giving tips on singing to Adele.
branny wrote:He's complained to the police about the abuse he received on twitter after last week. Maybe the powers that be at the bbc didn't wanna twist the knife. His decisions yesterday ultimately didn't affect the outcome so it was easier to gloss over his mistakes. Would have been interesting what they'd have said if it finished 1-0 to Fulham though.
Green & Blue wrote:I'm glad I did not watch motd.On the premiership in Ireland they picked up on it.Critical of the penalty and decisions that we should have had going our way.So poor for motd not to highlight such major issues in match analysis.Would make you wonder.Also just wanted to add that Hansen alone is enough to put any City fan off motd he can hardly brinf himself to say a good word about City it does not matter how well we perform.
bobby brows wrote:Biggest stitch up in the history of match of the day. fulham were given way too much credit in the highlights. love how we were also accused of not having played well despite 60 minutes of dominance
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:bobby brows wrote:Biggest stitch up in the history of match of the day. fulham were given way too much credit in the highlights. love how we were also accused of not having played well despite 60 minutes of dominance
I no longer watch Match of the Day but, in the newspapers this morning, Jol was quoted as saying that for 60 minutes, Fulham couldn't get the ball from City and they were only hanging on and playing for a point. City's possession was also calculated as, uniformly, in excess of 70%.
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:bobby brows wrote:Biggest stitch up in the history of match of the day. fulham were given way too much credit in the highlights. love how we were also accused of not having played well despite 60 minutes of dominance
I no longer watch Match of the Day but, in the newspapers this morning, Jol was quoted as saying that for 60 minutes, Fulham couldn't get the ball from City and they were only hanging on and playing for a point. City's possession was also calculated as, uniformly, in excess of 70%.
john68 wrote:MOTD was a must watch programme...it was the only programme of its type, there was no alternative.
Now with so many alternative sources, why would anyone even think of watching it? It warrants an audience of zero and if its audience figure dwindled, they would bin it.
You watch it, blame yourselves.
branny wrote:He's complained to the police about the abuse he received on twitter after last week. Maybe the powers that be at the bbc didn't wanna twist the knife. His decisions yesterday ultimately didn't affect the outcome so it was easier to gloss over his mistakes. Would have been interesting what they'd have said if it finished 1-0 to Fulham though.
Duckman wrote:What are the alternatives to motd? thanx
Duckman wrote:What are the alternatives to motd? thanx
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Harry Dowd scored, johnny crossan, zuricity and 527 guests