MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Dameerto » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:48 pm

Bastids making me wait 'til nearly midnight.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby bobby brows » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:49 pm

Fulham have worked hard against a city team below their best!

That coverage made itv look good
Please visit my website covering both Manchester City & Manchester City Women http://www.stealingfiveyards.com
User avatar
bobby brows
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2659
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: chorlton!
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby london blue 2 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:52 pm

Tbf at least they mentioned the 23 passes. It was a shit straight forward game.

As soon as the second goal went in we all became spurs fans for the remainder of the weekend
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10338
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby ross.mcfc » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:52 pm

Our game was the shittest game of the day and over after 2 minutes. Deserved to be on last.
ross.mcfc
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5060
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:50 am
Location: London

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:54 pm

I watched the game on a decent stream and I expected it to be last on.The first half was a shocker and although the 2nd was better it wasn't a good spectacle or contest.All the other games,maybe Swansea similar were probably better to watch than ours.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10667
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Blue Since 76 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:15 am

As a game, it deserved to be on after the credits. However, as Champions and the only team in the top 6 playing, I did expect to be a bit higher up the running order.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby LookMumImOnMCF.net » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:19 am

Christ
LookMumImOnMCF.net
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9316
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:49 pm
Supporter of: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net
My favourite player is: LookMumI'mOnMCF.net

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby ross.mcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:20 am

Blue Since 76 wrote:As a game, it deserved to be on after the credits. However, as Champions and the only team in the top 6 playing, I did expect to be a bit higher up the running order.


Get the good games on first, average in the middle and the one that people may stay up to watch at the end. Makes good scheduling if you ask me.

If you know the last game is Wigan 0 - 0 Stoke, you aint going to stay up for that are you.

A perfect example of victim culture. There is no story here. Our game was shit.
ross.mcfc
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5060
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:50 am
Location: London

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Mase » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:24 am

ross.mcfc wrote:Our game was the shittest game of the day and over after 2 minutes. Deserved to be on last.


Did you go to every other Premiership game today or are you just going off match of the day?
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 39589
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby ross.mcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:34 am

Mase wrote:
ross.mcfc wrote:Our game was the shittest game of the day and over after 2 minutes. Deserved to be on last.


Did you go to every other Premiership game today or are you just going off match of the day?


I'm going off the fact I watched our game and was bored to tears.
ross.mcfc
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5060
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:50 am
Location: London

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Im_Spartacus » Sun Jan 20, 2013 1:35 am

Interesting article here from 1996 about the perspective of bbc commentators, and the subsequent editing of highlights on motd. Im not sure there ever has been a conspiracy, but stuff like this in light of the things we still see to this day really have to make you wonder just how long we will accept being taken for fools by the bbc and the refereeing establishment.


http://www.wsc.co.uk/the-archive/108-Re ... ement-days


Manchester City need all the help they can get. In recent matches the referees have not come to their aid. Steve Parish muses on the inconsistencies of referees – and of the TV watchdogs

Alan Wilkie’s penalty award in the Manchester FA Cup derby, and Martin Bodenham’s failure to spot Asprilla’s elbow at work when Newcastle met City at Maine Road the week after, were both well examined by Match of the Day.

A referee making a wrong decision is common enough. Refs like Wilkie missing a clear push by Bruce on Symons but seeing a minor grapple as ‘holding’ typifies the sort of inconsistency – or blindness or bias – that makes a nonsense of the complaint that referees have been turned into ‘automata’.

There is no consistency of interpretation between referees, or even too often between one referee’s decisions in one match. Even fairly basic stuff like a player not wearing shinpads – hardly a matter for sharp eyes and instant judgment – seems to pass some referees by these days. Tim Flowers illegally marks his goal area week by week, and in the end it’s not a referee that punishes him but the ball hitting the illegal rut and bouncing over his shoulder, ho-ho!

But nor is there any consistency in the television treatment of incidents, and commentary. In the first minute of the Manchester derby Cantona and Brown both leapt in hard for the ball. With the ball out of play Cantona and Keane both then kicked Brown and got away with it – with Wilkie commended by summariser David Pleat for “defusing the situation” by allowing a quick throw-in, and by John Motson – “the best thing he could have done”.

Wilkie didn’t “defuse the situation” – he either did not see violent conduct or he chose to ignore it. But so too did Match of the Day, not even bothering to run the whole incident later. Why? To protect the judgment of their own commentators?

Now when Asprilla swings an elbow in a tussle with Keith Curle – an understandable if dangerous reaction when a defender is holding you back – the cameras dwell on it. Who decides which incidents to re-run? On what criteria? Does someone make a judgment that elbowing and butting are more serious than merely kicking an opponent? Or is it that Asprilla is Colombian and black? Or just the BBC bias toward United?

Then the FA steams in, picking up on incidents that the TV producers choose to highlight and ignoring the ones we all see but TV fails to analyse. But it is not just the odd highlighted – or ignored – bit of violent conduct that has brought so much criticism of referees this season. It’s that players do get away with tackles from behind that damage opponents, yet are booked for silly little dissents (often getting sent off for a second yellow card offence).
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9497
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Dubai
Supporter of: Breasts

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Hazy2 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:00 am

The commentary has me smirking this morning. Last on, classic lines throughout, The crowd have all gone.The hatred of us is funny.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9311
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Blue Since 76 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:21 am

ross.mcfc wrote:
Get the good games on first, average in the middle and the one that people may stay up to watch at the end. Makes good scheduling if you ask me.

If you know the last game is Wigan 0 - 0 Stoke, you aint going to stay up for that are you.

A perfect example of victim culture. There is no story here. Our game was shit.


So how many times over the last 20 years have the rags been on last? Or Liverpool when they were a top 4 side? Or Arsenal? I said our game was terrible, but we were the only top 6 side playing, which they usually obsess over.

A perfect example of the anti-City nonsense you post most of the time.
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Spurge » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:06 am

I'm no fan of the BBC far from it infact, but on this one I don't have a problem with City being on last.

We were the only team in the top 6 yesterday, it was a comfortable and largely uneventful win. So with the majority of games effecting the bottom half of the table and the relegation battle, all of which had either the same or more goals to show then it made sense to focus on this.
User avatar
Spurge
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2910
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Location Location
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Asa Hartford

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Beefymcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:24 am

Strange but true. I fell asleep just as it went to half-time last night and when I woke up this morning, turned on the TV in the hope of seeing MotD again and it was at the exact point that I'd fallen asleep.

Freaky ;-)
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46422
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby City64 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:25 am

Much better highlights on Sky Sports News this morning plus they covered actually how fuckin cold it was inside the Etihad and how nearly everyone was having to wear a beanie ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr im still fuckin shivering ffs , lol
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Beefymcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:29 am

City64 wrote:Much better highlights on Sky Sports News this morning plus they covered actually how fuckin cold it was inside the Etihad and how nearly everyone was having to wear a beanie ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr im still fuckin shivering ffs , lol

It was understandable why people fucked off early yesterday. I also think the conditions had an affect on the game and that's why it was so flat. It's OK having under-soil heating but that doesn't keep the muscles warm. It must've been below zero in the stadium yesterday and if it wasn't for the heating system in the pitch, a game could never/shouldn't really be played.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46422
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby City64 » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:33 am

Beefymcfc wrote:
City64 wrote:Much better highlights on Sky Sports News this morning plus they covered actually how fuckin cold it was inside the Etihad and how nearly everyone was having to wear a beanie ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr im still fuckin shivering ffs , lol

It was understandable why people fucked off early yesterday. I also think the conditions had an affect on the game and that's why it was so flat. It's OK having under-soil heating but that doesn't keep the muscles warm. It must've been below zero in the stadium yesterday and if it wasn't for the heating system in the pitch, a game could never/shouldn't really be played.



windchill of around minus 9 mate apparently ...... now thats fuckin cold !
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Beefymcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:35 am

City64 wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:
City64 wrote:Much better highlights on Sky Sports News this morning plus they covered actually how fuckin cold it was inside the Etihad and how nearly everyone was having to wear a beanie ! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr im still fuckin shivering ffs , lol

It was understandable why people fucked off early yesterday. I also think the conditions had an affect on the game and that's why it was so flat. It's OK having under-soil heating but that doesn't keep the muscles warm. It must've been below zero in the stadium yesterday and if it wasn't for the heating system in the pitch, a game could never/shouldn't really be played.



windchill of around minus 9 mate apparently ...... now thats fuckin cold !

That's cold. Our stadium design doesn't help either, it turns the place into a great big refridgerator.
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46422
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

Re: MOTD - Media Bias Against City

Postby Beefymcfc » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:54 am

On a similar note, are the Beeb taking the piss with our web page! Since Uniteds win midweek the top story on our page was 'Big Crowd See Rooney Score Winner' with a big fuck off picture of Rooney. Today the picture has gone in favour of yestrdays game but the top headline is still about the Rags.

Small point but one that pisses me right off.

[urlnp=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city]Link[/urlnp]
In the words of my Old Man, "Life will never be the same without Man City, so get it in while you can".

The Future's Bright, The Future's Blue!!!
User avatar
Beefymcfc
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 46422
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:14 am
Supporter of: The Mighty Blues

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dunnylad, Harry Dowd scored, Nigels Tackle, nottsblue and 399 guests