Page 8 of 11

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:38 pm
by DoomMerchant
Blue Since 76 wrote:If he plays again this season, we may as well take the trophy to the swamp ourselves.


sadly, it's theirs to defend, so...i don't think they need our help hauling it anywhere, metaphorically speaking of course.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:52 pm
by Blue Since 76
DoomMerchant wrote:
sadly, it's theirs to defend, so...i don't think they need our help hauling it anywhere, metaphorically speaking of course.


Fair point. In that case, we can ring them and tell them to stop wrapping it, Savic is playing.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:00 pm
by DoomMerchant
Ted Hughes wrote:Ok on guitar though.

[youtube]A67Bow78dDs&feature=related[/youtube]


that, my friend, is fucking hilarious.

cheers

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:09 pm
by Hazy2
Blue Since 76 wrote:Decided to watch Savic when he was in front of me in the first half last night. I'll ignore the sliced clearances and passes into touch for now and put them down to nerves.

However, his positional play was atrocious. Yaya was going mad at him at one point over it. On one occasion he was a good 20 yards behind every other City player, playing their forwards on side. He obviously learnt from that, so 5 mins later, he pushed up 10 yards in front of the rest of the defence. Worse, he actually looked across to see where Kolarov was and then kept going anyway.

If he had a long run of games alongside Vince, maybe, just maybe, he'd get it. We'd probably get relegated, but he might work it out. However, if you can't read a game at 21, I doubt he ever will. If he plays again this season, we may as well take the trophy to the swamp ourselves.


Is Bobby to stubborn to see he is lost !, that said Both goals were nothing to do with him Ballo thought fuck it I have ran far enough and Alex confirmed the defensive part of his game is not for him.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:59 pm
by Longball
i was negative after that display and i apologise= i am not a rag as some say i just wanna hit the spot with me comments, i LOVE city but i wnt disengage my brain for no one cheers

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:08 pm
by Longball
i dunno why but i cant blame him maybe its cos i like the verve

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:21 am
by Esky
He's the defensive version of Samaras.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:48 am
by bluebananamilksheikh
Esky wrote:He's the defensive version of Samaras.

Hopefully Celtic will also take Savic North of the Border!!!!!!!!!

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:30 am
by Grob
Esky wrote:He's the defensive version of Samaras.


Sums him up completely.

We can either watch him develop from a liability to being just simply not good enough, or we could sell him and buy someone capable in the summer.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:04 pm
by Spurge
Craig B wrote:I said after the Tottenham game he should never be allowed near the first team again, he's conference standard!


But playing in a champions league final, how things change!

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:12 pm
by PeterParker
He is still shit.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:21 pm
by Slim
Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
by zuricity
Slim wrote:Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.


What is 'Quality'? define it ! You can't, neither can i ,
because it means different things to different people.

The site is better for less waffle.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:30 pm
by Spurge
zuricity wrote:
Slim wrote:Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.


What is 'Quality'? define it ! You can't, neither can i ,
because it means different things to different people.

The site is better for less waffle.


Quality can be defined as.....well Stefan Savic of course!

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:31 pm
by Slim
zuricity wrote:
Slim wrote:Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.


What is 'Quality'? define it ! You can't, neither can i ,
because it means different things to different people.

The site is better for less waffle.


Okay, so maybe not Ted then.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 7:45 pm
by zuricity
Slim wrote:
zuricity wrote:
Slim wrote:Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.


What is 'Quality'? define it ! You can't, neither can i ,
because it means different things to different people.

The site is better for less waffle.


Okay, so maybe not Ted then.



where's the fcukin 'like' button :-)

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 8:03 pm
by Cocacolajojo
zuricity wrote:
Slim wrote:
zuricity wrote:
Slim wrote:Forget Savic, take a look at the posters in this thread who don't post anymore.

NQDP, ross, Ted, shawzy, Grob...damn that's some loss of quality.


What is 'Quality'? define it ! You can't, neither can i ,
because it means different things to different people.

The site is better for less waffle.


Okay, so maybe not Ted then.



where's the fcukin 'like' button :-)


Like

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 8:05 pm
by nottsblue
Savic reminds me of spider from Coronation Street

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 8:30 pm
by Hazy2
nottsblue wrote:Savic reminds me of spider from Coronation Street


Richard Ashcroft. Slavic has had a game I never saw in him, great story.

Re: Savic

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2016 8:34 pm
by nottsblue
Hazy2 wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Savic reminds me of spider from Coronation Street


Richard Ashcroft. Slavic has had a game I never saw in him, great story.

He has played well, you've got to give him that