Mancio4ever wrote:King Kev wrote:He made a few mistakes today. Maybe the senior players should have looked after him a bit better.
One thing is being a raw material and mistakes could be forbidden there, but that kind of shit like today nonsense short offload to the last man underpressure... just mean idiocy: not good enough for a major league, let alone quality needed to be a City player nowadays.
definitely the worst purchase of the recent history inclunding Sparky's.
If Mancini will start him again, no matter what on the physio room, he should be charged of criminal offence.
that said City havent lost because of Savic.
Who was meant to shut down the cross? Was it Nasri? Couldn't make it out clearly on the stream but he stood off instead of shutting the cross down. Inexcusable.Redna wrote:That missed pass did NOT cost us the goal. The blame for the goal is a combined Richards/DeJong.
Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:King Kev wrote:He made a few mistakes today. Maybe the senior players should have looked after him a bit better.
One thing is being a raw material and mistakes could be forbidden there, but that kind of shit like today nonsense short offload to the last man underpressure... just mean idiocy: not good enough for a major league, let alone quality needed to be a City player nowadays.
definitely the worst purchase of the recent history inclunding Sparky's.
If Mancini will start him again, no matter what on the physio room, he should be charged of criminal offence.
that said City havent lost because of Savic.
We've mainly lost because of Savic.
We didn't have a cutting edge but we dominated the game 2nd half. It should have been a draw.
mr_nool wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:King Kev wrote:He made a few mistakes today. Maybe the senior players should have looked after him a bit better.
One thing is being a raw material and mistakes could be forbidden there, but that kind of shit like today nonsense short offload to the last man underpressure... just mean idiocy: not good enough for a major league, let alone quality needed to be a City player nowadays.
definitely the worst purchase of the recent history inclunding Sparky's.
If Mancini will start him again, no matter what on the physio room, he should be charged of criminal offence.
that said City havent lost because of Savic.
We've mainly lost because of Savic.
We didn't have a cutting edge but we dominated the game 2nd half. It should have been a draw.
Did you miss Richard's defending (or lack thereof) for the cross? Savic dropped a bollock, but he was far from the only one.
Ted Hughes wrote:mr_nool wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:King Kev wrote:He made a few mistakes today. Maybe the senior players should have looked after him a bit better.
One thing is being a raw material and mistakes could be forbidden there, but that kind of shit like today nonsense short offload to the last man underpressure... just mean idiocy: not good enough for a major league, let alone quality needed to be a City player nowadays.
definitely the worst purchase of the recent history inclunding Sparky's.
If Mancini will start him again, no matter what on the physio room, he should be charged of criminal offence.
that said City havent lost because of Savic.
We've mainly lost because of Savic.
We didn't have a cutting edge but we dominated the game 2nd half. It should have been a draw.
Did you miss Richard's defending (or lack thereof) for the cross? Savic dropped a bollock, but he was far from the only one.
When you are all legging it back towards your own goal with the oppo running at you from all angles, shit happens.
Ted Hughes wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:King Kev wrote:He made a few mistakes today. Maybe the senior players should have looked after him a bit better.
One thing is being a raw material and mistakes could be forbidden there, but that kind of shit like today nonsense short offload to the last man underpressure... just mean idiocy: not good enough for a major league, let alone quality needed to be a City player nowadays.
definitely the worst purchase of the recent history inclunding Sparky's.
If Mancini will start him again, no matter what on the physio room, he should be charged of criminal offence.
that said City havent lost because of Savic.
We've mainly lost because of Savic.
We didn't have a cutting edge but we dominated the game 2nd half. It should have been a draw.
mr_nool wrote:
Did you miss Richard's defending (or lack thereof) for the cross? Savic dropped a bollock, but he was far from the only one.
Bluez wrote:If Savic had been sent off in the first minute we would still have been crap today. The whole team underperformed and when that happens the blame lies with the management
freshie wrote:mr_nool wrote:
Did you miss Richard's defending (or lack thereof) for the cross? Savic dropped a bollock, but he was far from the only one.
You're completely missing the point here. When Savic gave the ball away were in a position where we were in comfortable possession of the ball with most of Swansea's players in their own half and we were looking to build another attack. Savic's shit pass turned all that on it's head and completely fucked us up. The goal was his fault
mr_nool wrote:freshie wrote:mr_nool wrote:
Did you miss Richard's defending (or lack thereof) for the cross? Savic dropped a bollock, but he was far from the only one.
You're completely missing the point here. When Savic gave the ball away were in a position where we were in comfortable possession of the ball with most of Swansea's players in their own half and we were looking to build another attack. Savic's shit pass turned all that on it's head and completely fucked us up. The goal was his fault
I'm not missing the point - you are. I said he did drop a bollock, and his mistake lead to the goal.
But, Richard's defending was still shite, and that also contributed to the goal.
zuricity wrote:Well said Dougie and Mr Nool.
Joe Hart also had enough time to get his arse off the line to go for that cross too , crickey it was sent over by telegram...
Savic didn't have a lot to do. He tackled well, won the ball well on several occasions and did what defenders do when unsure, boot the thing out so the defense can get organised.
Looking for individual scapegoats when collectively the team did not play too well , but weren't so bad as the anger on here suggests. Is actually a waste of time. Swansea played well today, when not attacking they packed six players sometimes in a
line across their 18 yard box and then had three more close across the middle. That kind of close and determined defending is very difficult to break down.
We will still win the league.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], stupot, zuricity and 298 guests