Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby Buffalo Soldier » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:11 am

IanBishopsHaircut wrote:
BadKompany wrote:
IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Torres is 24 years old and could be a real asset in the future


27 in March.

Dzeko or fernando llorente for me


Is he?

Don't know where I pulled 24 from..however my point still stands


He's still 24?
User avatar
Buffalo Soldier
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2949
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:47 pm

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby Esky » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:14 am

IanBishopsHaircut wrote:
BadKompany wrote:
IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Torres is 24 years old and could be a real asset in the future


27 in March.

Dzeko or fernando llorente for me


Is he?

Don't know where I pulled 24 from..however my point still stands


Dzeko's 24.
User avatar
Esky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4412
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Melbourne
Supporter of: The Blue Ship

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby Blue Since 76 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:32 am

Wouldn't want to put all our eggs in the torres basket, but assuming we're after two strikers, he would be good as one of them. We've seen with Silva and Yaya that it can take 3 months to get used to PL. We can't really afford that, whereas torres would be straight in. My only concern would be giving liverpool the cash. I'd have preferred it when there was a chance it would be pocketed by a couple of yanks
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby Beeks » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:33 am

Esky wrote:
IanBishopsHaircut wrote:
BadKompany wrote:
IanBishopsHaircut wrote:Torres is 24 years old and could be a real asset in the future


27 in March.

Dzeko or fernando llorente for me


Is he?

Don't know where I pulled 24 from..however my point still stands


Dzeko's 24.


That's where I got confused..fucking hell I feel like John68..bedtime methinks
Image
User avatar
Beeks
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7545
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Leigh/South Stand 116
Supporter of: The Sky Blues
My favourite player is: Fernandinho

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:10 am

'Hodgson had pledged on Tuesday to play his one fit star name, Fernando Torres, but had a last-minute change of heart after being persuaded otherwise by his medical staff.'

Hmm. If that's truthfully down to him still being an injury risk & not because of protercting him for an impending transfer, it's just not worth the gamble of us paying fortunes for him. He's had since August to recover ffs.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Liverpool has changed. Torres to City.

Postby john@staustell » Thu Dec 16, 2010 9:01 am

There are several factors here.

Firstly I think the financial situation at the Dippers is more dire than they let on. They need cash either to 'rebuild' or to give NE-whatever some sort of dividend etc. So I dont think it would take the cash of 2 years ago to get him. £30-35M should do it.

Secondly they have clearly overplayed him, and he never was allowed to recover in the last 18 months. Used correctly he will be sensational for us.

Thirdly everyone seems to be talking Torres or Dzeko (or Tevez). Surely if Torres in Jan is possible (and it seems to be) then it would be in addition to the emotional one? And if EMO leaves in the summer then make it Torres and Dzeko.

We are all agreed I think that Adebayor, Jo and Santa Cruz are not where we want to go.

So instead of Tevez, Jo, Ade and RSC why not make it Tevez, Torres and Dzeko (and Jo!)? Or does anyone think you win the PL and Champions League with one striker?
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18866
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, CTID Hants, Harry Dowd scored, johnny crossan, Mase and 510 guests