Douglas Higginbottom wrote:It's all part of Mancini's approach to man management and time will tell whether he is getting it right.
saulman wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:It's all part of Mancini's approach to man management and time will tell whether he is getting it right.
I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here......
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e_clearout
".......... Mancini is from the Italian tradition, where managers remain more aloof and distant from the players, and aim to maintain a strictly professional relationship, has caused a problem or two.
The situation has been similar to that with Fabio Capello and England.
Neither man goes in for the ‘arm-round-the-shoulder’ style of management. If you are injured, or out on loan, or out of favour, you are simply not available, and therefore do not enter into the manager’s thoughts.
British managers tend to be more proactive in terms of a player’s personal life and his well-being, whereas Capello and Mancini like to keep things on a strict professional basis"
carl_feedthegoat wrote:saulman wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:It's all part of Mancini's approach to man management and time will tell whether he is getting it right.
I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here......
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e_clearout
".......... Mancini is from the Italian tradition, where managers remain more aloof and distant from the players, and aim to maintain a strictly professional relationship, has caused a problem or two.
The situation has been similar to that with Fabio Capello and England.
Neither man goes in for the ‘arm-round-the-shoulder’ style of management. If you are injured, or out on loan, or out of favour, you are simply not available, and therefore do not enter into the manager’s thoughts.
British managers tend to be more proactive in terms of a player’s personal life and his well-being, whereas Capello and Mancini like to keep things on a strict professional basis"
Well Fabio and Mancini are wrong then.
There are times when an arm around a shoulder is imperative...............as is in all businesses..there are "star players" that need a different approach if you want to get the best out of them.
So fuck them and their "ways of managing players" as its just plain wrong in my opinion.
the_georgian_genius wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:saulman wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:It's all part of Mancini's approach to man management and time will tell whether he is getting it right.
I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here......
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e_clearout
".......... Mancini is from the Italian tradition, where managers remain more aloof and distant from the players, and aim to maintain a strictly professional relationship, has caused a problem or two.
The situation has been similar to that with Fabio Capello and England.
Neither man goes in for the ‘arm-round-the-shoulder’ style of management. If you are injured, or out on loan, or out of favour, you are simply not available, and therefore do not enter into the manager’s thoughts.
British managers tend to be more proactive in terms of a player’s personal life and his well-being, whereas Capello and Mancini like to keep things on a strict professional basis"
Well Fabio and Mancini are wrong then.
There are times when an arm around a shoulder is imperative...............as is in all businesses..there are "star players" that need a different approach if you want to get the best out of them.
So fuck them and their "ways of managing players" as its just plain wrong in my opinion.
Whilst i don't agree with that style of management to say they are wrong is simply wrong in itself. If it is a italian method then you only have to look at the world cups, champions league, other european trophies won by italians to see that it isn't wrong. If that is the way they want to manage then the players are the ones who need to adapt.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:saulman wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:It's all part of Mancini's approach to man management and time will tell whether he is getting it right.
I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here......
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e_clearout
".......... Mancini is from the Italian tradition, where managers remain more aloof and distant from the players, and aim to maintain a strictly professional relationship, has caused a problem or two.
The situation has been similar to that with Fabio Capello and England.
Neither man goes in for the ‘arm-round-the-shoulder’ style of management. If you are injured, or out on loan, or out of favour, you are simply not available, and therefore do not enter into the manager’s thoughts.
British managers tend to be more proactive in terms of a player’s personal life and his well-being, whereas Capello and Mancini like to keep things on a strict professional basis"
Well Fabio and Mancini are wrong then.
There are times when an arm around a shoulder is imperative...............as is in all businesses..there are "star players" that need a different approach if you want to get the best out of them.
So fuck them and their "ways of managing players" as its just plain wrong in my opinion.
Whilst i don't agree with that style of management to say they are wrong is simply wrong in itself. If it is a italian method then you only have to look at the world cups, champions league, other european trophies won by italians to see that it isn't wrong. If that is the way they want to manage then the players are the ones who need to adapt.
So England and English Clubs that have also won everything dont count then?
the_georgian_genius wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:saulman wrote:I posted this in another thread but it's relevant here......
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... e_clearout
".......... Mancini is from the Italian tradition, where managers remain more aloof and distant from the players, and aim to maintain a strictly professional relationship, has caused a problem or two.
The situation has been similar to that with Fabio Capello and England.
Neither man goes in for the ‘arm-round-the-shoulder’ style of management. If you are injured, or out on loan, or out of favour, you are simply not available, and therefore do not enter into the manager’s thoughts.
British managers tend to be more proactive in terms of a player’s personal life and his well-being, whereas Capello and Mancini like to keep things on a strict professional basis"
Well Fabio and Mancini are wrong then.
There are times when an arm around a shoulder is imperative...............as is in all businesses..there are "star players" that need a different approach if you want to get the best out of them.
So fuck them and their "ways of managing players" as its just plain wrong in my opinion.
Whilst i don't agree with that style of management to say they are wrong is simply wrong in itself. If it is a italian method then you only have to look at the world cups, champions league, other european trophies won by italians to see that it isn't wrong. If that is the way they want to manage then the players are the ones who need to adapt.
So England and English Clubs that have also won everything dont count then?
Don't be stupid carl, of course they count. But the amount of what italian managers have won compared to british on the world and european stage leads me to beleive that their way is not wrong like you said. Neither way is wrong, you either adapt to it or whinge like a bitch. The british tend to whige like little bitches.
saulman wrote:Hang on a minute. Are people here seriously suggesting that it's wrong for Mancini to treat his players in a totally professional way, and yet it's OK for those players to go to the press and bitch about how hard done to they are?
Get fuckin serious. These whinging little shits get more money than most professions on the planet. They're paid that money to do something they love. They're paid to be professional.
If they can't be at least professional, then they deserve fuck all......and that includes an arm around the shoulder. IMO, they should get a kick up the fuckin arse and told to fuck off. There's plenty of players out there who are professional in their job.
If you listen back to that interview with Marwood, those are the players that are being targeted. (dunno what happened with Mario, they must really rate him)
Beefymcfc wrote:saulman wrote:Hang on a minute. Are people here seriously suggesting that it's wrong for Mancini to treat his players in a totally professional way, and yet it's OK for those players to go to the press and bitch about how hard done to they are?
Get fuckin serious. These whinging little shits get more money than most professions on the planet. They're paid that money to do something they love. They're paid to be professional.
If they can't be at least professional, then they deserve fuck all......and that includes an arm around the shoulder. IMO, they should get a kick up the fuckin arse and told to fuck off. There's plenty of players out there who are professional in their job.
If you listen back to that interview with Marwood, those are the players that are being targeted. (dunno what happened with Mario, they must really rate him)
Are you saying that Mancini can't control is men?
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
So England and English Clubs that have also won everything dont count then?
saulman wrote: (dunno what happened with Mario, they must really rate him)
brite blu sky wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:dazby wrote:Mike J wrote:i was told 'to get a grip' when i suggested this last week.
i reckon mancini will be out of the door before him anyway.
Get a grip.
Mancio is showing him tough love. If he responds as he should we'll get a better player as a result.
Hi Dazby, I know you're a big supporter of the Boss and was just wondering, with relation to your post, if you believe that he will get enough time to carry on with his 'Tough Love' policy, considering our current run of form? I.e. Is he under serious threat if the next 4 games don't go to plan?
Hi, i am really Dazby and just pretending to be BBS.. and i think that Bobby is developing his 'tough love' fetish to new levels with City, this is the main reason he bought Super Mario Balotelli as he is the ultimate tough love fetishist gadget. It is also the reason he took on Manchester City as they are also one of the worlds best tough love gadgets.. a kind of must have if you get my drift. The next part of the project will be two losses and two draws and Bobby will then apply his tough love to the fans, who he outlined in his original proposal to the Shiek ( a companion tough love fetishist ), were 'just gagging for it' and an ambition 'too good to be true'. I rekon a press release is already prepared where Bobby tells the fans they have lost their humour and are just a bunch of screaming babies, and if they cant do their job and get behind the team for 90 mins then they should all stay away or go and support another team like Stoke where everyone is mad for it.
Ted Hughes wrote:Quick, get him down from the gallows, get the rope from round his neck, call a doctor, see if he's still breathing, send the posse out for Balotelli..
Ted Hughes wrote:Quick, get him down from the gallows, get the rope from round his neck, call a doctor, see if he's still breathing, send the posse out for Balotelli..
saulman wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Quick, get him down from the gallows, get the rope from round his neck, call a doctor, see if he's still breathing, send the posse out for Balotelli..
I'm sure Balotelli will probably lynch himself. Let hope his football compensates for what clearly is one of the true mad bastards of the game.
IMO, AJ has probably had a rap on the knuckles with a ruler and told to speak to this nice man and answer all these loaded questions, there's a good boy.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, branny, carl_feedthegoat, carolina-blue, dick dastardley, Dubciteh, Google [Bot], Harry Dowd scored, HBlock Cripple, john@staustell, Mase, nottsblue, patrickblue, ruralblue, Sparklehorse and 299 guests