Original Dub wrote:So Hiddink was approached by City in the summer?
He also seems to be the favourite from this thread. So all you fucking numpties who keep telling me its pointless should take stock, because our owners clearly think it is in no way pointless and rightly so.
Its doesn't matter who is in charge, there is nothing wrong with a contingency plan. Even the scum had a contingency plan when it looked like Baconface might leave. All clubs have one or more contingency plans.
Its perfectly normal. It doesn't mean they want to sack the manager. Nor this thread.
Thanks to those who were able to contribute to it without having a little cry.
So we'll believe the press in this instance but when they're on about Tevez wanting to leave we'll start foaming at the mouth and moaning about how much bullshit they write?
I can't see the point in appointing Hiddink, its not like we're going to be able to build a lasting legacy with a guy who is over 60 already.