Kladze wrote:I also agree that the ref was top notch last night. The fact that he thought he'd seen Krasic dive and booked him for it should in no way be undermined by the fact that Krasic was actually fouled - he still made an academy award winning act of it.
Ted Hughes wrote:Kladze wrote:I also agree that the ref was top notch last night. The fact that he thought he'd seen Krasic dive and booked him for it should in no way be undermined by the fact that Krasic was actually fouled - he still made an academy award winning act of it.
So it was a foul then? I haven't been ablke to stomach watching a recording of the game as I hated every minute of it but I'm close to that area & thought there may have been contact. I'd just been saying a minute or two earlier that we'd made contact with him several times & he was sometimes staying on his feet picking & choosing his moments when to go down rather than dive every time, in order to try & get an important one.
MaseCTID wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Kladze wrote:I also agree that the ref was top notch last night. The fact that he thought he'd seen Krasic dive and booked him for it should in no way be undermined by the fact that Krasic was actually fouled - he still made an academy award winning act of it.
So it was a foul then? I haven't been ablke to stomach watching a recording of the game as I hated every minute of it but I'm close to that area & thought there may have been contact. I'd just been saying a minute or two earlier that we'd made contact with him several times & he was sometimes staying on his feet picking & choosing his moments when to go down rather than dive every time, in order to try & get an important one.
IMO he was already going down before contact, if any, was made.
MaseCTID wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Kladze wrote:I also agree that the ref was top notch last night. The fact that he thought he'd seen Krasic dive and booked him for it should in no way be undermined by the fact that Krasic was actually fouled - he still made an academy award winning act of it.
So it was a foul then? I haven't been ablke to stomach watching a recording of the game as I hated every minute of it but I'm close to that area & thought there may have been contact. I'd just been saying a minute or two earlier that we'd made contact with him several times & he was sometimes staying on his feet picking & choosing his moments when to go down rather than dive every time, in order to try & get an important one.
IMO he was already going down before contact, if any, was made.
MaseCTID wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Kladze wrote:I also agree that the ref was top notch last night. The fact that he thought he'd seen Krasic dive and booked him for it should in no way be undermined by the fact that Krasic was actually fouled - he still made an academy award winning act of it.
So it was a foul then? I haven't been ablke to stomach watching a recording of the game as I hated every minute of it but I'm close to that area & thought there may have been contact. I'd just been saying a minute or two earlier that we'd made contact with him several times & he was sometimes staying on his feet picking & choosing his moments when to go down rather than dive every time, in order to try & get an important one.
IMO he was already going down before contact, if any, was made.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, craigmcfc, gmercer1, Google [Bot], johnny crossan, johnnyondioline, patrickblue and 261 guests