Ted Hughes wrote:The correct thing would have been not to sack Hughes in the 1st place, see last season through to it's conclusion THEN decide on whether we needed a new manager. If we'd decided to sack Hughes at that point, Mancini would now be a new manager with a new team able to make the mistakes he currently is doing & have more breathing space without people being so critical.
johnpb78 wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:The correct thing would have been not to sack Hughes in the 1st place, see last season through to it's conclusion THEN decide on whether we needed a new manager. If we'd decided to sack Hughes at that point, Mancini would now be a new manager with a new team able to make the mistakes he currently is doing & have more breathing space without people being so critical.
Of course you are right, yet, it seems the club have made their bed on this issue now.
They sacked a manager who wasn't on the right "trajectory".
Given that last season, it wasn't totally imperative to qualify for the CL and yet Hughes still got sacked from a decent position in the PL, with a semi in the bag................none of this bodes well for Mancini another £150m down the line. I'm far from worried yet, but I am still concerned that he "doesnt get" english football, and that was so evident today.
Like I said I think we will manage top 4 under Mancini - what we manage beyond that though with this manager is potentially up for debate
ashton287 wrote:We can't really afford to get rid of the manager anyway because the new money rules come in at th end of the season don't they?. So if we get a new manager in he wouldnt be able to build a team of his own and any chance of CL football would be fucked which in the long term would fuck us even harder until were just a bleeding scrotem waking up in a hotel room and spending the next week crying in the shower.
avoidconfusion wrote:If City sack the manager again after just one season then we will never achieve anything no matter how much money is being spent on players.
johnpb78 wrote:ashton287 wrote:We can't really afford to get rid of the manager anyway because the new money rules come in at th end of the season don't they?. So if we get a new manager in he wouldnt be able to build a team of his own and any chance of CL football would be fucked which in the long term would fuck us even harder until were just a bleeding scrotem waking up in a hotel room and spending the next week crying in the shower.
The last chance to spend under the "old rules" will be January, or to get deals done before the start of June I believe. Aside from that though, I don't for one minute think that a new manager would be given any money as we have a squad which is easily capable of living with the best.
I think it would be absolute suicide to give Mancini the push regardless where we are come xmas, but seeing as the FFP rules will count for next year's income, and if next year's income doesn't include £20m+ champions league money then the cost of sacking the manager mid-season will pale into insignificance.
We just have to hope that this situation doesn't arrive, and I feel we will be comfortably up there come December regardless of a handful of shitty results.
ant london wrote:I was reasonably sure that Hughes could have got us there in the end....either last season or this but I am more convinced that Mancini actually has what it takes for the next level the more I now see.
We were unlucky against both Sunderland and Blackburn and we could very easily be sitting on 10 points if a couple of shit incidents hadn't gone against us. That is the case even with a depleted squad and one which has really not had any where like enough time to get to know itself.
I think this next month will show a more realistic snapshot of where we are at and I really don't think we are far off.
Honestly, the last two results were frustrating but I am not remotely worried
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Plain Speaking and 321 guests