Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Im_Spartacus » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:05 am

Ted Hughes wrote:For anyone who can be arsed, here's a pretty honest even handed piece from an Italian football site, written when Mancini 1st came, which describes Mancini's Inter systems & I think predicts his subsequent moves pretty accurately & fits with what we've seen so far. It gives us an idea of how it could work & imo puts DeJong down as a 1st choice for most of the season.


Good find that, surely Cambiasso, Zanetti and Vieira were regarded as good footballers rather than an angry bloke running around passing the ball to the opposition.

I find it hard to believe that De Jong has the ability to fulfil the role Mancini expected of the 3 above. He wastes possession so much after doing the good work in the tackle, I think he is still one who will/may end up being replaced sooner rather than later.
Image
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9497
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Dubai
Supporter of: Breasts

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:08 am

johnpb78 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:For anyone who can be arsed, here's a pretty honest even handed piece from an Italian football site, written when Mancini 1st came, which describes Mancini's Inter systems & I think predicts his subsequent moves pretty accurately & fits with what we've seen so far. It gives us an idea of how it could work & imo puts DeJong down as a 1st choice for most of the season.


Good find that, surely Cambiasso, Zanetti and Vieira were regarded as good footballers rather than an angry bloke running around passing the ball to the opposition.

I find it hard to believe that De Jong has the ability to fulfil the role Mancini expected of the 3 above. He wastes possession so much after doing the good work in the tackle, I think he is still one who will/may end up being replaced sooner rather than later.


DeJong's not a great creater but his stats for ball retention are actually better than 90 odd% of anybody we've got or possibly 100%. It's a bit of a myth that he always gives the ball away as he actually almost never gives the ball away.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Slim » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:11 am

Hart
Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov
Johnson--Toure--Milner--Silva
Tevez--Balotelli

or

Hart
Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov
Toure--Milner--de Jong
Tevez--Balotelli--Silva


I would say Barry has drawn the short straw here. However, with that lineup we are one game in and already have 2 injuries, so I am not sure over the course of a 60 game season that it will be a problem with Barry, de Jong and Milner getting games.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30343
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:18 am

Slim wrote:Hart
Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov
Johnson--Toure--Milner--Silva
Tevez--Balotelli

or

Hart
Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov
Toure--Milner--de Jong
Tevez--Balotelli--Silva


I would say Barry has drawn the short straw here. However, with that lineup we are one game in and already have 2 injuries, so I am not sure over the course of a 60 game season that it will be a problem with Barry, de Jong and Milner getting games.


I recon we ran out of steam in the middle last season & also played Barry injured quite a lot. This allows Mancini to keep 3 fit players in there all season if he chooses, so I recon we'll see most permutations possible including Barry & Milner playing together.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby mcfc1632 » Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:57 am

john@staustell wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:
john@staustell wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:From the Spurs game - it will be SWP



7th post in before someone states the obvious.

Also when can we get away from this 'first 11' nonsense? It is a squad, and Mancini has made it very clear it will be used as such.



Sorry John if it caused offence - I am just an old-fashioned sort of chap and chose to directly answer the question posed in the thread title - will try to do better in the future!!

I tried to add to the wider debate by posting what I thought was a decent assessment of the 1st 11


There aint one mate. But that aside I meant how many people were replying about Barry etc without stating the obvious SWP?!! It's beyond me what game some folk watch. GB is usually just about 1st on the City (unless rested) and England sheets, because of all the tidy, neat work he does which seemingly goes mostly un-noticed by fans of both entities. He was extremely tidy against Spurs, sweeping up, very neat on the ball and yet always gets low marks. Managers seem to appreciate him thankfully.

I sincerely believe though that the 'first 11' at home to, say, W Brom, will not be the first 11 away at Spuds.

A lot of these players now should have a field day in some games. But then I thought that when we signed Rodney Marsh!



Sorry for being sensitive - I mis-understood

I agree re GB, although I think that he will be rotated frequently - depending on (as you point out) who / where we are playing

get confused about all this talk about 3 DMs - and especially de jong. He is a very different player to GB and Ya Ya - and the only out and out DM - something which my view of Bobs formation will demand


In terms of guaranteed starts, I think that it is only Tevz, Ya Ya, Kolarov and Hart

After that I think that it will be de jong - with him only being rested for the (supposedly) easy games - I do not understand why people cannot see it - same as they miss the GB contribution
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:08 am

johnpb78 wrote:
Rag_hater wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:If it's Barry, I feel we are going to right direction. If it's De Jong, it's great step towards more positive football.

If it's one of the wingers then this was pointless transfer.

You really do talk through your bottom sometimes.


Correct about De Jong, but absolutely wrong in the case of SWP.

I hate to say it, but if he doesnt buck up, things could turn sour for him this season.


I wasn't talking about SWP as such. But if we take one of the attacking wingers off and put Milner in with three defensive midfielders, it will not improve our play one iota. However if we replace either De Jong or Barry with Milner, we will have replaced either fairly negative or very negative player with a positive player.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Im_Spartacus » Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:12 am

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
Rag_hater wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:If it's Barry, I feel we are going to right direction. If it's De Jong, it's great step towards more positive football.

If it's one of the wingers then this was pointless transfer.

You really do talk through your bottom sometimes.


Correct about De Jong, but absolutely wrong in the case of SWP.

I hate to say it, but if he doesnt buck up, things could turn sour for him this season.


I wasn't talking about SWP as such. But if we take one of the attacking wingers off and put Milner in with three defensive midfielders, it will not improve our play one iota. However if we replace either De Jong or Barry with Milner, we will have replaced either fairly negative or very negative player with a positive player.


If we replaced SWP with a player who can make the right decisions about making a pass when he needs to, dribble when he needs to, and cross from anywhere, that would be a huge improvement in my book.
Image
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9497
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Dubai
Supporter of: Breasts

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:02 pm

johnpb78 wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
Rag_hater wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:If it's Barry, I feel we are going to right direction. If it's De Jong, it's great step towards more positive football.

If it's one of the wingers then this was pointless transfer.

You really do talk through your bottom sometimes.


Correct about De Jong, but absolutely wrong in the case of SWP.

I hate to say it, but if he doesnt buck up, things could turn sour for him this season.


I wasn't talking about SWP as such. But if we take one of the attacking wingers off and put Milner in with three defensive midfielders, it will not improve our play one iota. However if we replace either De Jong or Barry with Milner, we will have replaced either fairly negative or very negative player with a positive player.


If we replaced SWP with a player who can make the right decisions about making a pass when he needs to, dribble when he needs to, and cross from anywhere, that would be a huge improvement in my book.


We can use AJ there or move Tevez to right and Adebayor or up front. There are lot of positive options there. However it's the central midfield that needs more positive outlook.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby DoomMerchant » Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:26 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:For anyone who can be arsed, here's a pretty honest even handed piece from an Italian football site, written when Mancini 1st came, which describes Mancini's Inter systems & I think predicts his subsequent moves pretty accurately & fits with what we've seen so far. It gives us an idea of how it could work & imo puts DeJong down as a 1st choice for most of the season.


Good find that, surely Cambiasso, Zanetti and Vieira were regarded as good footballers rather than an angry bloke running around passing the ball to the opposition.

I find it hard to believe that De Jong has the ability to fulfil the role Mancini expected of the 3 above. He wastes possession so much after doing the good work in the tackle, I think he is still one who will/may end up being replaced sooner rather than later.


DeJong's not a great creater but his stats for ball retention are actually better than 90 odd% of anybody we've got or possibly 100%. It's a bit of a myth that he always gives the ball away as he actually almost never gives the ball away.


i also find the notion that De Jong gives the ball away to be tiresome. He is challenged when football isn't played mostly on the floor, and isn't challenged to make a simple pass. People were reacting to the Spurs game like "it looks like his passing has improved." He was the exact same NDJ as ever for me. i dunno...

cheers
viVa el ciTy!

"All things considered, there's absolutely no escape from this hellish situation. I'm prepared to take the coward's way out if you are. It's reincarnation or nothing." -- Gideon Stargrave

Image
User avatar
DoomMerchant
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pellegrini's Hoodie
 
Posts: 22332
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Supporter of: MCFC. OK.
My favourite player is: The Game

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Im_Spartacus » Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:41 pm

DoomMerchant wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:For anyone who can be arsed, here's a pretty honest even handed piece from an Italian football site, written when Mancini 1st came, which describes Mancini's Inter systems & I think predicts his subsequent moves pretty accurately & fits with what we've seen so far. It gives us an idea of how it could work & imo puts DeJong down as a 1st choice for most of the season.


Good find that, surely Cambiasso, Zanetti and Vieira were regarded as good footballers rather than an angry bloke running around passing the ball to the opposition.

I find it hard to believe that De Jong has the ability to fulfil the role Mancini expected of the 3 above. He wastes possession so much after doing the good work in the tackle, I think he is still one who will/may end up being replaced sooner rather than later.


DeJong's not a great creater but his stats for ball retention are actually better than 90 odd% of anybody we've got or possibly 100%. It's a bit of a myth that he always gives the ball away as he actually almost never gives the ball away.


i also find the notion that De Jong gives the ball away to be tiresome. He is challenged when football isn't played mostly on the floor, and isn't challenged to make a simple pass. People were reacting to the Spurs game like "it looks like his passing has improved." He was the exact same NDJ as ever for me. i dunno...

cheers


I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.

The difference is that the singular lack of ambition in De Jong's passing means that 8 x 5 yard passes to feet being intercepted or going straight to the opposition is rather noticeable, wheras other players who misplace passes may be being a touch more ambitious than a pass to the man stood right in front / next of you.
Image
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9497
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Dubai
Supporter of: Breasts

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby brite blu sky » Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:19 pm

I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.


did you count these john ? Because the opti stats say that de Jong misplaced 4 out of 59 passes. and Barry misplaced 3 out of the same number 59. Incidently Yaya misplaced 2 out of 70. So if we can rely on those stats? it suggests there is not too much difference between the 3 of them.

I know stats dont tell you how someone plays, but equally they help give perspective on what we all think we see during a game.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
brite blu sky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Barcelona

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:08 pm

johnpb78 wrote:
DoomMerchant wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:
johnpb78 wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:For anyone who can be arsed, here's a pretty honest even handed piece from an Italian football site, written when Mancini 1st came, which describes Mancini's Inter systems & I think predicts his subsequent moves pretty accurately & fits with what we've seen so far. It gives us an idea of how it could work & imo puts DeJong down as a 1st choice for most of the season.


Good find that, surely Cambiasso, Zanetti and Vieira were regarded as good footballers rather than an angry bloke running around passing the ball to the opposition.

I find it hard to believe that De Jong has the ability to fulfil the role Mancini expected of the 3 above. He wastes possession so much after doing the good work in the tackle, I think he is still one who will/may end up being replaced sooner rather than later.


DeJong's not a great creater but his stats for ball retention are actually better than 90 odd% of anybody we've got or possibly 100%. It's a bit of a myth that he always gives the ball away as he actually almost never gives the ball away.


i also find the notion that De Jong gives the ball away to be tiresome. He is challenged when football isn't played mostly on the floor, and isn't challenged to make a simple pass. People were reacting to the Spurs game like "it looks like his passing has improved." He was the exact same NDJ as ever for me. i dunno...

cheers


I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.

The difference is that the singular lack of ambition in De Jong's passing means that 8 x 5 yard passes to feet being intercepted or going straight to the opposition is rather noticeable, wheras other players who misplace passes may be being a touch more ambitious than a pass to the man stood right in front / next of you.


The stats that I saw for both Barry & DeJong were superb.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby MBash721 » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:21 pm

mcfc1632 wrote:From the Spurs game - it will be SWP

I think that there will be only a few 'permanent' fixtures in the team, and those in order of appearances (assuming fit) will be:

Hart and Ya Ya

Kolarov

NDJ and Tevez

The system that we will play will demand 1 'out and out' DM - NDJ is one of the best in the world and the only one we have - IMO - despite what a lot of other posters think

Going forward I think that we will see this sort of formation as 1st choice:

--------------Hart------------------
-Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov-
-------------De Jong----------------
---------Milner---Toure-------------
Silva------------------------Balotelli-
-------------Tevez------------------

with Ade and Johnson coming on regularly during the game as we mix it up and good cover in all positions in the squad


I would think that they're not going to waste Balotelli on the wing. I think hes the big target striker that they need up top. Tevez would seem like a bitter fit on the wing.

A little picky, but wouldn't Silva be on the opposite side? I feel like he primarily plays as a left wing, but I could be mistaken
MBash721
Carlo Nash's Debut
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:34 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Emmanuel Adebayor

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Im_Spartacus » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:36 pm

brite blu sky wrote:
I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.


did you count these john ? Because the opti stats say that de Jong misplaced 4 out of 59 passes. and Barry misplaced 3 out of the same number 59. Incidently Yaya misplaced 2 out of 70. So if we can rely on those stats? it suggests there is not too much difference between the 3 of them.

I know stats dont tell you how someone plays, but equally they help give perspective on what we all think we see during a game.


Well thats what the O/S says, and the O/S is using the same figure for Yaya Toure that sky used over the weekend which showed him 2nd only to Scholes in accuracy of passing with 90 passes I think it was

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Nigel-de-Jong 61/69
http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Yaya-Toure 84/90
http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Gareth-Barry 65/71 (I misread that before sorry)

Therefore he WAS statistically the worst passer in the midfield, the O/S would surely have no reason to misreport this?
Last edited by Im_Spartacus on Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9497
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Dubai
Supporter of: Breasts

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby brite blu sky » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:39 pm

johnpb78 wrote:
brite blu sky wrote:
I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.


did you count these john ? Because the opti stats say that de Jong misplaced 4 out of 59 passes. and Barry misplaced 3 out of the same number 59. Incidently Yaya misplaced 2 out of 70. So if we can rely on those stats? it suggests there is not too much difference between the 3 of them.

I know stats dont tell you how someone plays, but equally they help give perspective on what we all think we see during a game.


Well thats what the O/S says, and the O/S is using the same figure for Yaya Toure that sky used over the weekend which showed him 2nd only to Scholes in accuracy of passing, so someone's not telling the truth


The OS! fucxl me.. somebody somewhere cant count.. thats worse than bad spelling !!
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
brite blu sky
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:23 pm
Location: Barcelona

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:11 pm

johnpb78 wrote:
brite blu sky wrote:
I find that it is much more tiresome when you watch him misplace simple passes again and again. He misplaced 8 on Saturday, not the worst in the team by any stretch, as that was Barry who misplaced 13.


did you count these john ? Because the opti stats say that de Jong misplaced 4 out of 59 passes. and Barry misplaced 3 out of the same number 59. Incidently Yaya misplaced 2 out of 70. So if we can rely on those stats? it suggests there is not too much difference between the 3 of them.

I know stats dont tell you how someone plays, but equally they help give perspective on what we all think we see during a game.


Well thats what the O/S says, and the O/S is using the same figure for Yaya Toure that sky used over the weekend which showed him 2nd only to Scholes in accuracy of passing with 90 passes I think it was

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Nigel-de-Jong 61/69
http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Yaya-Toure 84/90
http://www.mcfc.co.uk/Players/Midfielders/Gareth-Barry 65/71 (I misread that before sorry)

Therefore he WAS statistically the worst passer in the midfield, the O/S would surely have no reason to misreport this?


Toure 90! I think they must be counting headers, that's bollocks!
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Who get's dropped in place of Milner?

Postby mcfc1632 » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:00 pm

MBash721 wrote:
mcfc1632 wrote:From the Spurs game - it will be SWP

I think that there will be only a few 'permanent' fixtures in the team, and those in order of appearances (assuming fit) will be:

Hart and Ya Ya

Kolarov

NDJ and Tevez

The system that we will play will demand 1 'out and out' DM - NDJ is one of the best in the world and the only one we have - IMO - despite what a lot of other posters think

Going forward I think that we will see this sort of formation as 1st choice:

--------------Hart------------------
-Boateng--Toure--Kompany--Kolarov-
-------------De Jong----------------
---------Milner---Toure-------------
Silva------------------------Balotelli-
-------------Tevez------------------

with Ade and Johnson coming on regularly during the game as we mix it up and good cover in all positions in the squad


I would think that they're not going to waste Balotelli on the wing. I think hes the big target striker that they need up top. Tevez would seem like a bitter fit on the wing.

A little picky, but wouldn't Silva be on the opposite side? I feel like he primarily plays as a left wing, but I could be mistaken


Not picky at all - I agree, but I think he could play in both places - I put him there because I think that Balotelli would be more left sided (although he could also be in both places) - but in fact they would not be on the wing in general because the width would come from the FBs
mcfc1632
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3861
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:44 pm

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 419 guests