The mancityfans.net football forum

On SSN saying that Bellamy wants to go to spurs but we won't sell to a rival club. If true, I like this stance.

ENIAM NAM wrote:On SSN saying that Bellamy wants to go to spurs but we won't sell to a rival club. If true, I like this stance.

That's exactly how it should be, well done City.

ENIAM NAM wrote:On SSN saying that Bellamy wants to go to spurs but we won't sell to a rival club. If true, I like this stance.

It's been out for a while and that's why Bellers got a shit on. I am one of the biggest admirers of Craig's professionalism on the pitch and exactly what we needed at the time, but where he lets himself down is off it and at the end of the day, 90 minutes a week is not the be-all and end-all.

We are doing are business right, and if the likes of Bellers and Robinho don't like it, then they know where the door is!

He can go to Celtic, but no PL club, his success would be embarrassing.

Imagine how ell he'd do (again) in the SPL though?

13021J wrote:He can go to Celtic, but no PL club, his success would be embarrassing.

Imagine how ell he'd do (again) in the SPL though?

He could go to Fulham for me, I'd like to see them do well.

Beefymcfc wrote:

13021J wrote:He can go to Celtic, but no PL club, his success would be embarrassing.

Imagine how ell he'd do (again) in the SPL though?

He could go to Fulham for me, I'd like to see them do well.

Funny you said that, Hughes was on SSN saying he's interested in Bellers

Twitchy will have to take his brown envelopes from somewhere else!

He's a nap to go to Fulham, I reckon.

If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:

13021J wrote:He can go to Celtic, but no PL club, his success would be embarrassing.

Imagine how ell he'd do (again) in the SPL though?

He could go to Fulham for me, I'd like to see them do well.

Funny you said that, Hughes was on SSN saying he's interested in Bellers

that's why I said it mate, SSN told me Hughes had took over ;-)

Ted Hughes wrote:If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Funny but that's what I was thinking. It seems a bit petty that a guy not good enough for our 25 isn't allowed to go to a leading prem side just in case he hurts us? We can be like that if we want but it smacks of no class.

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Funny but that's what I was thinking. It seems a bit petty that a guy not good enough for our 25 isn't allowed to go to a leading prem side just in case he hurts us? We can be like that if we want but it smacks of no class.

maybe, just maybe, it's bellamy that wants out and he has caused enough friction with Mancini that he's had enough. Maybe, just maybe, we know what he is capable of but have taken the decision that the TEAM may be better off without him. In that case, we don't want to give home to a direct competitor do we?

ENIAM NAM wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Funny but that's what I was thinking. It seems a bit petty that a guy not good enough for our 25 isn't allowed to go to a leading prem side just in case he hurts us? We can be like that if we want but it smacks of no class.

maybe, just maybe, it's bellamy that wants out and he has caused enough friction with Mancini that he's had enough. Maybe, just maybe, we know what he is capable of but have taken the decision that the TEAM may be better off without him. In that case, we don't want to give home to a direct competitor do we?

Maybe people are trying to find a reason for something that makes no sense whatsoever?

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Funny but that's what I was thinking. It seems a bit petty that a guy not good enough for our 25 isn't allowed to go to a leading prem side just in case he hurts us? We can be like that if we want but it smacks of no class.

Pfffff, for such good posters, I can't believe you on't know the truth?

PS. Just say it, Mancini Out! Or, do you just miss Hughes?

I don't want to see him go but there is obviously something not right between him and Mancini. Whether it's personal or just that he doesn't fit with how Mancini want us to play .... who knows. In any case Mancini will always win the argument and get his own way.

However, Bellers ON LOAN to Fulham would suit me too and seem like sensible business.

We would not be strengthening our main rivals but strengthening a team that will not challenge us but could damage the teams that are our rivals.

As an on loan player he could not play against us. Also, if some of our recent signings didn't work out this season .... we could just bring him back the season after.

I would be quite happy for ths one to go through

Seems that the fans are starting to support the manager rather than the player. Maybe we are going in the right direction after all?

Ted Hughes wrote:

ENIAM NAM wrote:

Douglas Higginbottom wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:If he's so shit then why do we care? Surely he's no use to a top 4 side? Or could it be that it's a great big fat lie that he was released for 'technical reasons' ?

Funny but that's what I was thinking. It seems a bit petty that a guy not good enough for our 25 isn't allowed to go to a leading prem side just in case he hurts us? We can be like that if we want but it smacks of no class.

maybe, just maybe, it's bellamy that wants out and he has caused enough friction with Mancini that he's had enough. Maybe, just maybe, we know what he is capable of but have taken the decision that the TEAM may be better off without him. In that case, we don't want to give home to a direct competitor do we?

Maybe people are trying to find a reason for something that makes no sense whatsoever?

that's just the point. None of us know the actual reason!

Beefymcfc wrote:Seems that the fans are starting to support the manager rather than the player. Maybe we are going in the right direction after all?

MANCINI OUT!!!!

Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:Seems that the fans are starting to support the manager rather than the player. Maybe we are going in the right direction after all?

MANCINI OUT!!!!

NQDP <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

x

I like Bellers...But his ramblings of late has pissed me off little bit...No need to come out to the press like that.
All in all...He was a Hughes signing and things can be a little bit difficult when a new manager comes in and players will be moved on and the new gaffer will bring in new lads..Thats the norm at any club
Top player Bellers and i will miss him in the blue shirt but shit happens.