Svensational wrote:Was that on SSN? Cant see it anywhere on the net?
the_georgian_genius wrote:I'm baffled as to why we rejected £6m for him from Sunderland yet give him to them free for a year??
You won't get a better offer of £6m for him, we should of cashed in when we could.
Good luck to him though. Sunderland is about his level.
the_georgian_genius wrote:I'm baffled as to why we rejected £6m for him from Sunderland yet give him to them free for a year??
You won't get a better offer of £6m for him, we should of cashed in when we could.
Good luck to him though. Sunderland is about his level.
Svensational wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:I'm baffled as to why we rejected £6m for him from Sunderland yet give him to them free for a year??
You won't get a better offer of £6m for him, we should of cashed in when we could.
Good luck to him though. Sunderland is about his level.
Because hes young, homegrown and a class defender so why sell him?
Might as well loan him out for a season where he will most likely play every game for Sunderland and come back with alot of first team experience.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:I have never really rated Ned like some fans do....he has never excelled and has been found out many times imo.
Financially it makes no difference to City wether we loan him out or sell him..neither here or there is it.
Svensational wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:I'm baffled as to why we rejected £6m for him from Sunderland yet give him to them free for a year??
You won't get a better offer of £6m for him, we should of cashed in when we could.
Good luck to him though. Sunderland is about his level.
Because hes young, homegrown and a class defender so why sell him?
Might as well loan him out for a season where he will most likely play every game for Sunderland and come back with alot of first team experience.
Crossie wrote:Great move for all. He needs a full season under his belt, he's NEVER been fit for a full season.
38 games under his belt and I honestly think he could be pushing for an England place.
He just needs experience and a regular playing partner
Crossie wrote:Great move for all. He needs a full season under his belt, he's NEVER been fit for a full season.
38 games under his belt and I honestly think he could be pushing for an England place.
He just needs experience and a regular playing partner
Svensational wrote:the_georgian_genius wrote:I'm baffled as to why we rejected £6m for him from Sunderland yet give him to them free for a year??
You won't get a better offer of £6m for him, we should of cashed in when we could.
Good luck to him though. Sunderland is about his level.
Because hes young, homegrown and a class defender so why sell him?
Might as well loan him out for a season where he will most likely play every game for Sunderland and come back with alot of first team experience.
Crossie wrote:Great move for all. He needs a full season under his belt, he's NEVER been fit for a full season.
38 games under his belt and I honestly think he could be pushing for an England place.
He just needs experience and a regular playing partner
HeyMark wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:I have never really rated Ned like some fans do....he has never excelled and has been found out many times imo.
Financially it makes no difference to City wether we loan him out or sell him..neither here or there is it.
I remember getting hammered on here a few seasons back when I suggested we sell him. He's a decent defender, probably better defensively than richards and should never be played at RB but he looks soooo awkward on the ball, whenever he passes the ball it looks like its taking him so much effort just to get it to a team mate.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:HeyMark wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:I have never really rated Ned like some fans do....he has never excelled and has been found out many times imo.
Financially it makes no difference to City wether we loan him out or sell him..neither here or there is it.
I remember getting hammered on here a few seasons back when I suggested we sell him. He's a decent defender, probably better defensively than richards and should never be played at RB but he looks soooo awkward on the ball, whenever he passes the ball it looks like its taking him so much effort just to get it to a team mate.
He is one of the worst passers of the ball I have ever fucking seen.
Beefymcfc wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:HeyMark wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:I have never really rated Ned like some fans do....he has never excelled and has been found out many times imo.
Financially it makes no difference to City wether we loan him out or sell him..neither here or there is it.
I remember getting hammered on here a few seasons back when I suggested we sell him. He's a decent defender, probably better defensively than richards and should never be played at RB but he looks soooo awkward on the ball, whenever he passes the ball it looks like its taking him so much effort just to get it to a team mate.
He is one of the worst passers of the ball I have ever fucking seen.
Bollox Carl, did you not see that pass to himself last season ;-)
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 388 guests