gillie wrote:Best City player on view tonight imo.
Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
Ted Hughes wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
I meant quality as part of the 'application' required. Nimely's progressed steadily each season rather than standing still like many of our young players & he was happy to do a job out wide, work hard & try to do the right things. He's quick, skillful, can beat a man & scores goals. That gives him a chance, even at City.
Agree about Cunningham. I've never rated him at all but he looked a better option than Bridge yesterday & showed perhaps why Mancini keeps involving him in games.
john@staustell wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
I meant quality as part of the 'application' required. Nimely's progressed steadily each season rather than standing still like many of our young players & he was happy to do a job out wide, work hard & try to do the right things. He's quick, skillful, can beat a man & scores goals. That gives him a chance, even at City.
Agree about Cunningham. I've never rated him at all but he looked a better option than Bridge yesterday & showed perhaps why Mancini keeps involving him in games.
Only 1 reason CunningHAM is there, and some others - to advertise to buyers
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:The reason the young players are there and playing is that we wouldn't have a team without them.There are so many missing and we can't just play the top players for 90 minutes in pre season as that's just not the way it works.Looks like they are " being given a chance" and they are but there isn't another option.
Ted Hughes wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
I meant quality as part of the 'application' required. Nimely's progressed steadily each season rather than standing still like many of our young players & he was happy to do a job out wide, work hard & try to do the right things. He's quick, skillful, can beat a man & scores goals. That gives him a chance, even at City.
Agree about Cunningham. I've never rated him at all but he looked a better option than Bridge yesterday & showed perhaps why Mancini keeps involving him in games.
JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
I meant quality as part of the 'application' required. Nimely's progressed steadily each season rather than standing still like many of our young players & he was happy to do a job out wide, work hard & try to do the right things. He's quick, skillful, can beat a man & scores goals. That gives him a chance, even at City.
Agree about Cunningham. I've never rated him at all but he looked a better option than Bridge yesterday & showed perhaps why Mancini keeps involving him in games.
No worries Ted, I do know what you meant and I agree. I was trying to highlight the difference between NImely and Tutte who both applied themselves but where there was an obvious difference in the quality of player. Nimely could have a future with us while Tutte looks like an average Championship player. (Sorry if it came across as if I was having a go!)
In addition to Cunningham, who has real potential, I thought Boyata and Mee looked far more accomplished than Ned or Bridge.
john@staustell wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:JB wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Agree about Nimely but not about Ireland.
Nimely's showing the aplication Mancini would have been hoping for from many of the 'fringe' players but hasn't been seeing from most. He must be giving himself a shout of an occasional place in the squad.
Application and quality Ted.
Unfortunately, Tutte and Kay were just not good enough, but did see some potential in Cunningham last night - looked far better than Bridge who was by far our worst last night.
Our best? AJ did more in 10 minutes than most did in 90 and I thought Jo took his goal well.
I meant quality as part of the 'application' required. Nimely's progressed steadily each season rather than standing still like many of our young players & he was happy to do a job out wide, work hard & try to do the right things. He's quick, skillful, can beat a man & scores goals. That gives him a chance, even at City.
Agree about Cunningham. I've never rated him at all but he looked a better option than Bridge yesterday & showed perhaps why Mancini keeps involving him in games.
No worries Ted, I do know what you meant and I agree. I was trying to highlight the difference between NImely and Tutte who both applied themselves but where there was an obvious difference in the quality of player. Nimely could have a future with us while Tutte looks like an average Championship player. (Sorry if it came across as if I was having a go!)
In addition to Cunningham, who has real potential, I thought Boyata and Mee looked far more accomplished than Ned or Bridge.
I dont want to be rude JB, but that whole sentence makes me grateful Mancini is the one in charge!
OKSTATE99 wrote:All but 3 of the Elite Squad went home last night. In the post match Mee said he was staying, and I have to guess Nimley and Boyata are the other ones. It could be Cunningham over Nimley if RM knows what he has in Nims and wants a longer look at Cunningham.
I would think some of the coaches are going home too, cause some of the WC players could start fitness training in carrington as well.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 477 guests