Beefymcfc wrote:Sister of fu wrote:He will come in play three blinders and you lot that have slated him before he has even played for us will be licking his hairy balls. What's the odds on a thread saying " we should sign Fulop" next week??
He played in goal during Sunderlands crap run of results and last year Gordan could not oust him when he returned from injury. For fuck sake get behind him cause I really can't see him being on the bench come Saturday.
Ha ha ha, well said. Agreed, most of those goals were against the top sides. 10 against Chelsea, 4 against us, 2 each against Spurs and Villa, where Bruce knew he was on a hiding to nothing. He was also in for the Arsenal match where they won 1-0.
Sister of fu wrote:Even Brad Friedal let 7 in then 3 against Chelsea and no one is going to tell me he is a shite keeper. I think it's unfair to judge him when none of us have really seen enough of him to say he is shite or other wise.
Grob wrote:Hopefully we are still working on getting Hart back.
Fulops decent though, id hope he goes into the team if Joe stays put.
avoidconfusion wrote:One article stating that Birmingham wanted 1.6 million in compensation because they risked dropping up to 4 places in the league if they were to lose their 2 remaining games.
And on top of that they apparently also wanted extrta money if we finish 4th.
They can well and truly fuck off.
avoidconfusion wrote:One article stating that Birmingham wanted 1.6 million in compensation because they risked dropping up to 4 places in the league if they were to lose their 2 remaining games.
And on top of that they apparently also wanted extrta money if we finish 4th.
They can well and truly fuck off.
john@staustell wrote:As I understand it this Hart business was blocked by the League, not Birmingham City. So why all the vitriol?
Also I wouldn't be too surprised if either Gunnar or Fulop started on Saturday (someone said it would be 'funny' if Gunnar started). It's about having 2 keepers in case one is injured innit?
Simple but beyond the grasp of some folks.
I still think the way the team is set out Given has been pretty underemployed in the last few months, apart from the odd picking the ball out of the net when some other pillock fucked up.
So any of these keepers, if confident enough, will be fine.
Mike J wrote:john@staustell wrote:As I understand it this Hart business was blocked by the League, not Birmingham City. So why all the vitriol?
Also I wouldn't be too surprised if either Gunnar or Fulop started on Saturday (someone said it would be 'funny' if Gunnar started). It's about having 2 keepers in case one is injured innit?
Simple but beyond the grasp of some folks.
I still think the way the team is set out Given has been pretty underemployed in the last few months, apart from the odd picking the ball out of the net when some other pillock fucked up.
So any of these keepers, if confident enough, will be fine.
the premier league may have blocked it, but before all that bham were making stupid demands. one of such is to compensate them for any season ticket revenue they lost ahead of next year as a result of slipping down the table. unbe fucking levable
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, Indianablue, JDOE, johnny crossan, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 463 guests