Original Dub wrote:Mancini wins in every department.
Well that's that then.
Original Dub wrote:Mancini wins in every department.
Well that's that then.
Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
The Original Special One wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
Stats are all well and good, but, stats aside, Mancini had the benefit of players who had had time to get to know each other's play.
Mancini gets us into the Champions League, he's The Man
It really is that simple!
craigmcfc wrote:Cheers IBH, good post and nice to see some comparison stats. Ignore the 2 home defeats and Mancinis' stats are pretty damn good
Socrates wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
Stats are all well and good, but, stats aside, Mancini had the benefit of players who had had time to get to know each other's play.
Mancini gets us into the Champions League, he's The Man
It really is that simple!
True but you could equally say that Hughes had the benefit of having hand picked the players and several years experience of the league he was managing in while Mancini had to get to know the players from scratch and get used to a new league at the same time.
The Original Special One wrote:Socrates wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
Stats are all well and good, but, stats aside, Mancini had the benefit of players who had had time to get to know each other's play.
Mancini gets us into the Champions League, he's The Man
It really is that simple!
True but you could equally say that Hughes had the benefit of having hand picked the players and several years experience of the league he was managing in while Mancini had to get to know the players from scratch and get used to a new league at the same time.
good points, although how do you value their respective handicaps?
Hughes deserves a lot of credit for bringing in the players and having the right idea regarding attacking football.
But he really blew it, big-time, the way he couldn't sort out our defence
The Original Special One wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
Stats are all well and good, but, stats aside, Mancini had the benefit of players who had had time to get to know each other's play.
Mancini gets us into the Champions League, he's The Man
It really is that simple!
Ted Hughes wrote:..and Hughes started the season with a team of players half of whom had barely met, Tevez not match fit, Ireland underachieving, accomodating Robinho. Mancini inherited a side with Tevez scoring regularly, was allowed to fuck Robinho off & drop Ireland & was praised for it by the very same people who would have hung Hughes for doing the same.
The comparisons are meaningless imo. All my posts early season were that I expected us to struggle for a bit then finish strongly. We did a bit better than I expected early season & a bit worse afterwards. The fact we changed managers in the middle of it has made very little difference. Both have good & bad points but neither has proved that they're good enough.
HeyMark wrote:craigmcfc wrote:Cheers IBH, good post and nice to see some comparison stats. Ignore the 2 home defeats and Mancinis' stats are pretty damn good
Ignore Hughes two away defeats and his stats are even more impressive! Why would you ignore any of them? They're there to be taken into account
craigmcfc wrote:HeyMark wrote:craigmcfc wrote:Cheers IBH, good post and nice to see some comparison stats. Ignore the 2 home defeats and Mancinis' stats are pretty damn good
Ignore Hughes two away defeats and his stats are even more impressive! Why would you ignore any of them? They're there to be taken into account
Because I have no hidden agenda. I have no particular preference for either manager and I was merely making the point that without the 2 home defeats his record is pretty damn good, as I believe I already said. As you pointed out, without Hughes 2 away defeats his record is very good too. Happy now?
Slim wrote:The Original Special One wrote:Mark ( Blue Army ) wrote:Good post mate, maybe now we can let this whole Hughes v Mancini shit go. Mancini wins hands down and he's here to stay...hopefully.
Stats are all well and good, but, stats aside, Mancini had the benefit of players who had had time to get to know each other's play.
Mancini gets us into the Champions League, he's The Man
It really is that simple!
Of course Mancini also has had 6 months to get to know the players and Hughes had 18 months. Hughes had 3 windows to get in the players he wanted, Mancini had one. Hughes had a preseason, Mancini had 3 days.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: belleebee, BlueinBosnia, Majestic-12 [Bot], nottsblue, patrickblue, s1ty m, salford city and 398 guests