The Times, THRICE, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancin

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Man In Blue » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:06 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:09 pm

The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


But that doesn't make him a rag does it?
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Man In Blue » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:12 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


But that doesn't make him a rag does it?


people who idolise rags generally are rags i would have thought. why do you think he idolises a rag?
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby london blue 2 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:14 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


But that doesn't make him a rag does it?


just a twat who likes rags....lol
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10338
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby ant london » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:14 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


But that doesn't make him a rag does it?


You really don't help yourself Antti

Your comment to Doug was out of order, factually fucking bollocks and you have several decent posters pointing this out to you

AND STILL you can't do the sensible thing and shut the fuck up

OR even be the bigger man and apologise for being a cunt
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Original Dub » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:17 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


But that doesn't make him a rag does it?


To be honest, I always consider those who idolise Manchester United players to be rags. I'm quite confident you do too. And you've just said that one of the most dedicated blues on here (who keeps all of us informed with stuff we wouldn't have a breeze about otherwise) idolises a rag.

In fact, we've had this same discussion a few times. Whether you mean to or not, you quite regularly question fellow blues' support, whether its saying we rather when City lose or saying that we are rag lovers when we want to sign Tevez... now this?

Why?
Original Dub
 

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Douglas Higginbottom » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:19 pm

He didn't call me a rag and I never thought he intimated it either.But he is wrong that I idolised Hughes and he should realise that. Just a bit of OTT stuff which seems to be fairly normal.
Douglas Higginbottom
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10667
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:42 pm

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Slim » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:24 pm

The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


So if I say that Bill Gates is a billionaire, and that he is my idol, does that make me a billionaire?
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30343
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Dazzacity » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:24 pm

All Ill ask is for you to look at our results since Mancini took over.All this negative football shite people are comin up with has just stemmed from the fact that Mancini is Italian and its believed that is how they play football over there.

We narrowly lost to a side fightin for the title .We just have to forget about it and move on.. Also, look at our squad before you blame the manager - he has no other options..
User avatar
Dazzacity
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:04 pm

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Man In Blue » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:27 pm

Slim wrote:
The Man In Blue wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Where the fuck did I say that?????? Outrageous allegetion.


you say = "Hughes is Rag twat"

then say he is doug's idol.

so, you are saying doug idolises a rag.


So if I say that Bill Gates is a billionaire, and that he is my idol, does that make me a billionaire?


just being oblique does not a point make - you know as well as i do that something solid an material such as personal wealth cannot be compared with something like the support an individual gives a football team/player.

or maybe you dont.
User avatar
The Man In Blue
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5266
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Whalley Range

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Original Dub » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:31 pm

Slim wrote:
Original Dub wrote:What a fucking poxy post to direct at one of the most dedicated blues we have on this site. You say Mark Hughes is his idol? Well doug might be too nice to say it to you but you're a right cunt for intimating such total shit. You're calling him a rag. Shame on you.

And you've moved further from reality since YOUR idol joined the club. You never have one bad word to say about a performance and every cunt on this site knows your double standards stink to high heaven. We always seem to be "unlucky" now or "everything was spot on, the players didn't do their jobs" and lots of other excuses. You also rip into anyone who dares question why we've only beaten ONE team from the top 8 under Mancini, or who even dares to question the manner of a performance.

Get fucking REAL. You don't have to slate him, but you'd be taken a lot more seriously if every now and then you gave even 1% of the criticism you gave to Hughes.

You should be ashamed at that post IMO. You honestly should.


Fuck off munich.


Plastic cunt.
Original Dub
 

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby ant london » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:32 pm

oooooh that was low

but funny

and well deserved
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Niall Quinns Discopants » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:51 pm

Alright, alright.....sorry Doug.
Sometimes we're good and sometimes we're bad but when we're good, at least we're much better than we used to be and when we are bad we're just as bad as we always used to be, so that's got to be good hasn't it?


Mark Radcliffe
User avatar
Niall Quinns Discopants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 40255
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Deep in the pimp game
Supporter of: Holistic approach
My favourite player is: Bishop Magic Don Juan

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Original Dub » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:58 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Alright, alright.....sorry Doug.


Fuck sake, you're no fun today ... :)
Original Dub
 

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby ant london » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:59 pm

Original Dub wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Alright, alright.....sorry Doug.


Fuck sake, you're no fun today ... :)



balls to that...good man Antti

hey OD...is that a picture of you in the avatar? Man you look fugly... ;-)
Image
User avatar
ant london
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Neil Young's FA Cup Winning Goal
 
Posts: 11505
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Almaty
Supporter of: Cityski
My favourite player is: Mario Balotelli

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby Original Dub » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:03 pm

ant london wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:Alright, alright.....sorry Doug.


Fuck sake, you're no fun today ... :)



balls to that...good man Antti

hey OD...is that a picture of you in the avatar? Man you look fugly... ;-)


Yeah it is mate.

Paddy's day just gone. As I explained to the crew on Satdi, it just seemed to represent your typical "fiddle dee dydle dee" Irishman, so I said "fiddle dee dydle fuck it, I'll put it on my diddle dee dydle avatar".

Oh and yo moma fugly....

bitch
Original Dub
 

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby london blue 2 » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:04 pm

Edited:

Gay post.
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10338
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Original Special One » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:16 pm

Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:
Kiss_The_Goat wrote:All i'm going to say is 5-0 up away from home at half time - how is that the result of a cautious Plan A? Sorry but your argument is bollox mate.
Everyones disappointed we lost the derby but we've been in scintillating form in the last few weeks, scoring for fun and were unlucky to not take all 3 points on Saturday. You're right with Sunderland though. That was one of the most Jekyll and Hyde performances ive ever seen.
Bring on the Arse. We'll beat them, Spurs will lose to the scum, the ash cloud will fuck off and everything will be lovely again.



Lol I think you missed the bit where he said "At half-time, if we haven't already scored at least three goals, employing Plan A,. he instructs them to follow Plan B"

Burnley was that match .


And weather had nothing to do in second half.

You have become one of the biggest and consistent moaners since your idol left the club.

you're obviously not paying atention in class.
And perhaps you care to point out all the mentions of this 'idol' of mine I've referred to?
The Original Special One
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:09 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Yaya Toure

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Original Special One » Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:24 pm

Kiss_The_Goat wrote:
The Original Special One wrote:
Kiss_The_Goat wrote:All i'm going to say is 5-0 up away from home at half time - how is that the result of a cautious Plan A? Sorry but your argument is bollox mate.
Everyones disappointed we lost the derby but we've been in scintillating form in the last few weeks, scoring for fun and were unlucky to not take all 3 points on Saturday. You're right with Sunderland though. That was one of the most Jekyll and Hyde performances ive ever seen.
Bring on the Arse. We'll beat them, Spurs will lose to the scum, the ash cloud will fuck off and everything will be lovely again.

I'm not talking about a team that had surrendered even before they trotted out on the pitch, as Burnley was.
I'm talking about 'football teams': y'know, 11 players who want to play.

And I'm sure you'll recall that until we got that penalty, to go one up against Birmingham, they were dealing very capably with whatever we threw at them.
And 'Plan A' had to be modified, anyhow, since they really didn't want to attack us, so were left with no alternative.

I can honestly say, although I don't think I said so here in advance of the game, but I was telling friends, and said so elsewhere, that I expected that over-cautious Plan A against ManUre on Saturday.
And what infuriates me is that this was a team which were on their 'downers', and we handed them the initiative.
So by the time the second half started, they had control of the game and were confident they could take us


I don't disagree with what you say about the scum game. I think we really could have gone for the jugular with more urgency in the early parts of the first half but I think you're being harsh about how we've been in recent weeks. What you see as an over cautious, negative approach to games we've won by 4 or more goals?, I see as tactically calculated performances that worked and resulted in us scoring for fun. I really cant see how any rational fan can have a problem with a 6-1 and 5-1 victory?

Everyone sees a game differently, that is pretty clear, but regardless of whether you think we should have attacked more or whatever in the derby, we were unlucky not to get 3 points. Thats a fact. We had good chances at 0-0 in the last 10 minutes after restricting the team second in the league and with a goal difference of +51 to very few chances.

I had a good reason I mentioned that 3 goal half time score.
Because if our opponents don't show up, or, if, like Birmingham, their small squad is showing the effects of a long hard season, then given the strike force we have, we're bound to capitalise on it.
But Sunderland at home were fighting for their Premier League lives.
And we gave this mediocre Man U team a life-line by giving them too much respect.

If we had developed into a more attack-oriented team, as you think we were, and I had hoped we were, we would, and should, have gone for the jugular on Saturday.
If we had, then we'd be convinced about Mancini, and Arsenal would be quivering in their boots about facing us.
Now, even after losing to Wigan, they'll believe they can take us!
The Original Special One
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:09 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Yaya Toure

Re: The Times, twice, wouldn't Publish My Comments About Mancini

Postby The Original Special One » Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:06 pm

This thread applies to today's set-up, also

As an under-strength Gooners team were there for the taking, also!
The Original Special One
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3442
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:09 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Yaya Toure

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bluemoon4610, carolina-blue, CTID Hants, Google [Bot], patrickblue, PeterParker, salford city, Stan and 416 guests