The mancityfans.net football forum

Hopefully Hughes wont get himself into to much trouble! And anyway, The ref had no right to send him of! Outrageous decision and Bellamy wont be available for Wednesday which is a bit of a blow but hopefully Robinho can show what he is made of and put in a performance.

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 65,00.html

"Manchester City boss Mark Hughes has confirmed he has been asked to explain his comments regarding Craig Bellamy's sending-off against Bolton Wanderers.

Bellamy was dismissed during City's 3-3 draw at the Reebok Stadium on Saturday after picking up a second yellow card for simulation.

Referee Mark Clattenburg adjudged Bellamy to have dived just outside the penalty area following a challenge by Bolton defender Paul Robinson.

Television replays suggested there was contact from Robinson, causing Bellamy to lose his balance, and Hughes was unhappy after the match.

Hughes described the decision to dismiss Bellamy as 'laughable' and 'ridiculous', and he has now been asked by the Football Association to explain those comments.

"What I said at the time, I stand by that," said Hughes, who has until 22nd December to respond to the FA, on Sky Sports News.

"By all accounts, the FA have sent a letter through asking for my version of events, so really I can't discuss it any further.

"My statements are on record from the weekend."

Bellamy will now miss City's trip to Tottenham Hotspur on Wednesday night and Hughes admits the Welshman's absence will impact on his team.

He added: "Craig has been one of our top performers this season and to miss him for any game is a blow for us.

"But we've got good quality that can come in and no doubt make an impact."

It would be utter bollocks if he got himself into more trouble even if he just replied by telling the truth. Which is that the official were laughable througout the game.

This whole matter is becoming utterly beyond comprehension.
1..The referee makes a mistake.
2..The referee (reportedly) admits his mistake.
3..The player who is the victim of his mistake remasins banned.
4..Hughes makes a comment regarding the referee's (self admitted) mistake and becomes under investigation.

THE FUCLIN WORLD OF FOOTBALL HAS GONE STARK RAVING MAD.
IT DEFIES COMMON SENSE, RATIONALITY AND IS ABJECT NONSENSE.

john68 wrote:This whole matter is becoming utterly beyond comprehension.
1..The referee makes a mistake.
2..The referee (reportedly) admits his mistake.
3..The player who is the victim of his mistake remasins banned.
4..Hughes makes a comment regarding the referee's (self admitted) mistake and becomes under investigation.

THE FUCLIN WORLD OF FOOTBALL HAS GONE STARK RAVING MAD.
IT DEFIES COMMON SENSE, RATIONALITY AND IS ABJECT NONSENSE.

It really does. I can't understand why if the ref admitted his mistake Hughes is being investigated for his words and most of all why Bellamy remains banned.

If I was Hughes now i'd explain my comments in an interview on sky sports news for the world to hear stating that I am happy to stand by my comments and that the standard of referreeing in this country is not what it should be, and that the FA are protecting the officials instead of the interests of good clean football.

I'd also state that there is no punishment, fine or touchline ban that could make me feel sorry for stating the truth and i'd appeal to other managers to start vocalising their aggrevances on all occasions.

Until Referee's are held accountable for their mistakes/cheating they will remain such a poor standard which is only bad for the game.

Personally, I'd tell the FA I was only only making public what I overheard taggart and Arsene Wenger say in conversation.
I would add that I thought Mr Clattenberg did a good job considering his poor eyesight, low IQ and lack of morals.

john68 wrote:This whole matter is becoming utterly beyond comprehension.
1..The referee makes a mistake.
2..The referee (reportedly) admits his mistake.
3..The player who is the victim of his mistake remasins banned.
4..Hughes makes a comment regarding the referee's (self admitted) mistake and becomes under investigation.

THE FUCLIN WORLD OF FOOTBALL HAS GONE STARK RAVING MAD.
IT DEFIES COMMON SENSE, RATIONALITY AND IS ABJECT NONSENSE.

I completely agree, this need for the FA to have an investigation into everything a manager or player says is killing the game and taking away the passion of many fans in my opinion. I used to love the football we saw many years ago, even it is was a bit raw...it certainly was better than the sterile shit that gets served these days. Yes the players, pitches, stadiums, etc are better but the game is dying a slow death from these men in suits having to find something to meet about on a Monday morning to keep them in a job!!

An "own goal panel" ffs......in the past if there was any doubt it was automatically awarded to the striker as the defending player didn't want it anyway!!

Rant over!!

Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

The problem is that we replaced the "blazers" at the fa for the "blunderers" that are obviously stupid and lack basic grammar skills.

laugh⋅a⋅ble  /ˈlæfəbəl, ˈlɑfə-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [laf-uh-buhl, lah-fuh-] Show IPA
Use Laughable in a Sentence- The refs decisions were laughable
See web results for Laughable- I did so you really don`t need a grown man to do it for you
See images of Laughable- Any of taggart really
–adjective such as to cause laughter; funny; amusing; ludicrous.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1590–1600; laugh + -able

Related forms:

laugh⋅a⋅ble⋅ness, noun
laugh⋅a⋅bly, adverb


Synonyms:
humorous, droll, comical, farcical, ridiculous; risible. See funny.


Antonyms:
sad, melancholy.
This last bit made me laugh. How I would describe the fa. MARK PLEASE EXPLAIN LAUGHABLE.

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

Yeh, thats the way I read it as well. Hughes doesn't seem to be talking like he's in trouble.

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

Can I have a pint of what you're drinking.

Lev Bronstein wrote:

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

Can I have a pint of what you're drinking.

Its this line that makes me agree with KK on this:

By all accounts, the FA have sent a letter through asking for my version of events,

That sounds to me, like they want to know what he heard rather than are punishing him for an outburst.

The whole problem with this is our managers name isn't Alex Fergescum.

Personally I reckon Hughes will welcome a discussion about what happened on saturday

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

That's how I see it mate, and by bringing the matter up in this way the FA won't be seen as trying to undermine the Refs Association. I'm sure they suspended him not too long ago but had to reinstate him after a lengthy investigation. I think they see Clattenburg as more of a cunt than we do!

Beefymcfc wrote:

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

That's how I see it mate, and by bringing the matter up in this way the FA won't be seen as trying to undermine the Refs Association. I'm sure they suspended him not too long ago but had to reinstate him after a lengthy investigation. I think they see Clattenburg as more of a cunt than we do!

They did because of the companie(s) he had were going Bump and there were irregularities or something - he wiggled his way out of that one somehow...

Twobob wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:

King Kev wrote:Could it be that the FA actually want to investigate what hughes said because they are concerned about Clattenburg's integrity and want to investigate the matter further rather than because they want to slap hughes with a fine?

That's how I see it mate, and by bringing the matter up in this way the FA won't be seen as trying to undermine the Refs Association. I'm sure they suspended him not too long ago but had to reinstate him after a lengthy investigation. I think they see Clattenburg as more of a cunt than we do!

They did because of the companie(s) he had were going Bump and there were irregularities or something - he wiggled his way out of that one somehow...

Cheers 2Bob, and I think there was more (a bit of Jimmy Cricket there). He was in the fray for some betting irregularities as well ( seen it on here I think). That says it all; did he have us down for a 3-2 loss?

Integrity is paramount in his game, yet certain people/associations overlook the obvious every time.

Do you reckon they could ask him to explain what the fuck is going on in our defence whilst he is in an explaining mood

john68 wrote:This whole matter is becoming utterly beyond comprehension.
1..The referee makes a mistake.
2..The referee (reportedly) admits his mistake.
3..The player who is the victim of his mistake remasins banned.
4..Hughes makes a comment regarding the referee's (self admitted) mistake and becomes under investigation.

THE FUCLIN WORLD OF FOOTBALL HAS GONE STARK RAVING MAD.
IT DEFIES COMMON SENSE, RATIONALITY AND IS ABJECT NONSENSE.

I'm going to put that rant in my Manicfesto next year ... fuclin great

johnpb78 wrote:Do you reckon they could ask him to explain what the fuck is going on in our defence whilst he is in an explaining mood

Yes mate, think they are going to ask about throw in rules and off sides; just to see if the refs have universal rules!