Page 1 of 1

Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:15 am
by john@staustell
Armed with the fact that most non-City punters (and probably most journalists) didn't see this match on ESPN I have noticed a different form of anti-City bias these days:

Sunday Supplement - all three morons said 'Spurs and Villa look the ones strong enough to break into the top 4' SS usually ignores City unless we have a scandal.

Andy Gray - all sorts of mindless rubbish on 'the last word' about the ball hitting Micah's hands when, as Graham Poll says, he was clearlt trying to get out of the way. But Gray did say we were 'good, very, very good', and he's backing us I reckon for top 4.

Sunday Telegraph - shocking report full of factual error, basically written from a Chelsea point of view.

NOTW - ran a back-page story about Hiddink taking over - excellent timing and obviously sent to press before the game result was tagged above!

Alan Green - the ultimate twat and really needs to go into a nursing home. I went to the pub to gloat on Sunday and my mate (Chelsea) said he 'only heard it on five live and was the ref as bad as they said?' Having heard others' reports on this Green clearly has a heavy anti-City bias and it was 'all the refs fault, how dare City tackle them' etc. The man is a menace.

On occasion there are reasonable, objective journalists but there are so many twats out there.

Re: Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:21 am
by Chinners
Alan Green is a cunt of the highest order, he'd come second in a cunt competition because he is such a cunt.

I wrote to the BBC once complaining about his bias and refuse to listen to 5Live matches now if he's the Cuntontator. Needless to say, I got no reply

Re: Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:27 am
by patrickblue
john@staustell wrote:
Alan Green - the ultimate twat and really needs to go into a nursing home. I went to the pub to gloat on Sunday and my mate (Chelsea) said he 'only heard it on five live and was the ref as bad as they said?' Having heard others' reports on this Green clearly has a heavy anti-City bias and it was 'all the refs fault, how dare City tackle them' etc. The man is a menace.



I had a look at one of the Chelsea forums at the weekend, to see what their point of view was. Amongst all the we was robbed by the ref shit, the other main point they were coming up with was that Alan Green was biased toward City. They also seem to regard him as a c**t of the highest order. I think he's just pissed off with red scouse's dilemma and is slagging everyone else.

Re: Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:35 am
by Pretty Boy Lee
Us city fans like a moan about the media don't we?

Just ignore the knobs, it's obvious we're going places, my mind cannot be broken about us anymore, we are on the up without a shadow of a doubt.

Re: Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:15 pm
by dikdik
Bring back Kenneth Wolstenholme!!

They think it's all over.... it will be soon....

:)

Re: Media bias - umpteenth chapter

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:45 pm
by MaineRoadMemories
Alan Green clearly has a major problem with City. I don't get why the BBC continue with him as his style of presenting is TalkSport not the BBC.

This was a good article about him. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... radio.html