The mancityfans.net football forum

In each game we seem unable to change anything when the score changes, there are no substituitions save for like for like what is Hughes doing, has he no Plan B?

Does he have a proper plan A?

i would just give mourinho whatever the fuck he wants.

failing that, hiddink. someone who knows who to manage top class players.

Install Jim Cassel. NOW!!
CTID!!

Mike J wrote:i would just give mourinho whatever the fuck he wants.

failing that, hiddink. someone who knows who to manage top class players.

Amen to that.

RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute

Crossie wrote:RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute

WORSE THAN SAMARAS.
FACT.

Id take someone running to the dugout and shootin Hughes in the head as a plan B.

We shouldn't need one at home to Fulham, Burnley and Hull.

hughes should sit everyone involved in the club down to watch villa v spurs. he might then see how attacking football should be played.

We don't even seem to have a plan in the first place. Once we have an A I might be an OAP (41 atm)
I don't feel constructive but I've been tiring of spineless performances. Where's the guts,where's the will to improve.
Where's the glow, where's the determination, where's the concrete to make some concrete shoes????
CTID!!

We have a plan A which everybody has worked out and they are playing us well. We need inventin and change. MH cant seem to do it

he should steer well clear of plans until he manages to find a clue

aristation wrote:In each game we seem unable to change anything when the score changes, there are no substituitions save for like for like what is Hughes doing, has he no Plan B?

You've made a reasonable point here for the following reason: Hughes has repeatedly gone on about the need for options, the need for a variety of players in different positions, and the need to be able to change tactics mid-game..... but when have we seen this really happen ? When did he ever make a substitution or a tactical change that made the fans think "wow. I never saw that one coming"...

Mr Miyagi wrote:

aristation wrote:In each game we seem unable to change anything when the score changes, there are no substituitions save for like for like what is Hughes doing, has he no Plan B?

You've made a reasonable point here for the following reason: Hughes has repeatedly gone on about the need for options, the need for a variety of players in different positions, and the need to be able to change tactics mid-game..... but when have we seen this really happen ? When did he ever make a substitution or a tactical change that made the fans think "wow. I never saw that one coming"...

Why not sending out the irrational Weiss the last 10 mins. He could've made the difference.
CTID!!

Mr Miyagi wrote:

aristation wrote:In each game we seem unable to change anything when the score changes, there are no substituitions save for like for like what is Hughes doing, has he no Plan B?

You've made a reasonable point here for the following reason: Hughes has repeatedly gone on about the need for options, the need for a variety of players in different positions, and the need to be able to change tactics mid-game..... but when have we seen this really happen ? When did he ever make a substitution or a tactical change that made the fans think "wow. I never saw that one coming"...

He did that today. Most of us in 125 never saw the 2 subs coming cos most of us know football. Why keep the same shape if its not working? I`ve never been MH out but he is trying my patience.I do beleive the job+expectation+big player egos may be too big for him

Here is plan B for our boys in the next game:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wRkzCW5qI

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Crossie wrote:RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute

WORSE THAN SAMARAS.
FACT.

Ever tried coming on with 15 mins to go and making an impact in a football match? Not easy. He's not had a lot of playing time and think it's well harsh to single him out. I mean, worse than Samaras? !!?

uwe's_skyblue_duvet wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Crossie wrote:RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute

WORSE THAN SAMARAS.
FACT.

Ever tried coming on with 15 mins to go and making an impact in a football match? Not easy. He's not had a lot of playing time and think it's well harsh to single him out. I mean, worse than Samaras? !!?

Not worse than Samaras, but I am not sure he is good enough either. He hasn't had much playing time, but as the time has gone on he doesn't seem to be getting better either. I know he is still coming back from injury but then he should be playing in the reserves.

This thread also highlights another problem whenit comes to solutions, we have calls for Mourinho (ultra defensive boring football) and calls for more attacking football in the same thread. So which one should it be?

Bluez wrote:

uwe's_skyblue_duvet wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Crossie wrote:RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute

WORSE THAN SAMARAS.
FACT.

Ever tried coming on with 15 mins to go and making an impact in a football match? Not easy. He's not had a lot of playing time and think it's well harsh to single him out. I mean, worse than Samaras? !!?

Not worse than Samaras, but I am not sure he is good enough either. He hasn't had much playing time, but as the time has gone on he doesn't seem to be getting better either. I know he is still coming back from injury but then he should be playing in the reserves.

This thread also highlights another problem whenit comes to solutions, we have calls for Mourinho (ultra defensive boring football) and calls for more attacking football in the same thread. So which one should it be?

http://www.skysports.com/football/league/0,19540,11853,00.html
So Mourinho is boring?.