Page 1 of 2

Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:16 pm
by Manx Blue
Good evening chaps...firstly, I'm away next week so haven't seen the site, and humbly apologise if this has been covered.

I fear David beckham may become a city player in the January window...why?

1 he has confirmed he will play in europe from the end of the US season.

2 the beckhams are as we know manipulated by money

3 our owner has a reasonable amount of cash which would satisfy david.

4 we appeared to be in the running for a right midfielder in the transfer window, until around 5 hours before the window closed.

5. Beckham has confirmed "offers". We have cash, and David left the lot across the road after a boot in the face

6. Why not return to Europe by playing in the best league to keep you in the managers eye, rather than play for an aging team which could be off a European stage by the time the new year approaches?

7. That fuckin inane cockernee grin. Please see 1-5 for inspiration!

Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:21 pm
by Manx Blue
Good evening chaps...firstly, I'm away next week so haven't seen the site, and humbly apologise if this has been covered.

I fear David beckham may become a city player in the January window...why?

1 he has confirmed he will play in europe from the end of the US season.

2 the beckhams are as we know manipulated by money

3 our owner has a reasonable amount of cash which would satisfy david.

4 we appeared to be in the running for a right midfielder in the transfer window, until around 5 hours before the window closed.

5. Beckham has confirmed "offers". We have cash, and David left the lot across the road after a boot in the face

6. Why not return to Europe by playing in the best league to keep you in the managers eye, rather than play for an aging team which could be off a European stage by the time the new year approaches?

7. That fuckin inane cockernee grin. Please see 1-5 for inspiration!

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:22 pm
by shawzy
Hope not..Cant stand the bloke..Slaggin City off in the past.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:23 pm
by Manx Blue
Dub post mods-please delete

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:27 pm
by Manx Blue
Just a gut feeling chaps. I had the same gut feeling regarding petrov and bentley which was thread on here. definitely Not itk...just bad guts.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:28 pm
by gillie
Manx Blue wrote:Just a gut feeling chaps. I had the same gut feeling regarding petrov and bentley which was thread on here. definitely Not itk...just bad guts.

Manx mate not a snowballs chance in hell imo.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:29 pm
by ronk
Elaborate on point 4 please.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 pm
by ronk
Manx Blue wrote:Good evening chaps...firstly, I'm away next week so haven't seen the site, and humbly apologise if this has been covered.



Good evening. I haven't seen the site next week either. Go to bed, you're having a bad dream and will feel worse in the morning if you don't drink lots of water.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:34 pm
by Manx Blue
ronk wrote:
Manx Blue wrote:Good evening chaps...firstly, I'm away next week so haven't seen the site, and humbly apologise if this has been covered.



Good evening. I haven't seen the site next week either. Go to bed, you're having a bad dream and will feel worse in the morning if you don't drink lots of water.


lol ronk!

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:37 pm
by london blue 2
8. bollocks

9. big bollocks

10. big hairy bollocks

11. bring back musampa

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:14 am
by DoomMerchant
ronk wrote:Elaborate on point 4 please.


i think he's referring to the alleged pursuit of drink driver Bentley maybe? dunno what else it could be.

cheers

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:23 am
by Slim
Gotta be thinking no chance, this is a side trying to build for the next five years, not the next season. If we sign a right winger in january we'll probably be back in for Bentley...god knows Hughes doesn't like to let one get away and we've already seen what a persistant prick he can be with Santi.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:33 am
by HuntCast
No chance, and Hughes would have to have some sort of brain damage to consider it.
Golden balls isn't even the best player on the LA Galaxy, FFS. Only a club looking for a shirt salesman will consider him, and frankly, City don't need the money bad enough.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:08 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Beckscum is a rag through and through and only while back made a comment about 'there only being one Club in Manchester' or something like that having (weak) pop at us.

I don't think THAT rag bastard would join us. But who knows, I would've never expected to see rag legend managing us either.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:39 am
by King Kev
This thread has just made me throw up in my mouth.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:50 am
by Scatman
Manx Blue wrote:Just a gut feeling chaps. I had the same gut feeling regarding petrov and bentley which was thread on here. definitely Not itk...just bad guts.


you were wrong about that as well

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:05 am
by Beeks
Seriously though...Over my rotting putrid carcass

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:08 am
by Fish111
Not a chance in hell!!! Only the housewives who go to watch City will want this to happen, all other City fans will not be impressed if this ever came off. He's slated us in the past, he's had a hand in preventing players coming to us and also, i don't think Hughes would want him tbh. He isn't the type of player that will improve us. He is 35 years old, we don't need dinosaurs like him now. I'm gobsmacked that he's even getting considered for England still.

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:59 am
by dick dastardley
I know money tals but he has said on many occasions that he would never play for us, thank fuck!!
because of his allegeace to the rags!!!!!!!!

Re: Controversial!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:09 am
by simon12
Not sure I could watch us if he played