Retrospective bans

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:53 pm

Saul Goodman wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Both will be banned. Mings longer than Zlatan. Dont worry. Itll be okay

Just like i expected. Club and player bias aside, the FA got this spot on


Did they fuck, where's Twatan's charge for his attempted stamp?
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Sister of fu » Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:59 pm

This incident has actually done Jose a huge favour as the media haven't really mentioned the fact they drew 1-1 with a team who haven't won in 2017, conceded goals like they have Bravo in goal and had 10 men. It also took the spotlight away from Eric Pogba Pogba who yet again had another stinker. Jose will be shacking big noses hand for this.
Sister of fu
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5770
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:44 am
Location: Manchester
Gender: Female
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Uwe Rosler

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Dub City » Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:36 pm

So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit. He knows he is getting off lightly that his own stamp and throw have not been highlighted.
Dub City
Horlock's Aggressive Walk
 
Posts: 540
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:09 am

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:52 pm

Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit. He knows he is getting off lightly that his own stamp and throw have not been highlighted.


If a big enough song and dance were to be made about his other 'transgressions' in that game, I wonder if the FA could be dragged kicking and screaming into looking at those separately ??

Trouble is, time is passing and the scent is going cold, as it were :cry:
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Saul Goodman » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:38 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Both will be banned. Mings longer than Zlatan. Dont worry. Itll be okay

Just like i expected. Club and player bias aside, the FA got this spot on


Did they fuck, where's Twatan's charge for his attempted stamp?

I wasnt aware they were banning for attempted foul play.

Mings challenge was worse so he gets a longer ban. Makes sense to me.
User avatar
Saul Goodman
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 5:18 am
Location: Toronto
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bernardo Silva

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Justified logic » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:38 pm

Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit. He knows he is getting off lightly that his own stamp and throw have not been highlighted.

Dunno. Difficult one.
Justified logic
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:40 pm
Location: Playing in the hole
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Saul Goodman » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:39 pm

Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit

What did he say afterwards that every other player wouldn't have said?
User avatar
Saul Goodman
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 5:18 am
Location: Toronto
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bernardo Silva

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mase » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:40 pm

Saul Goodman wrote:
Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit

What did he say afterwards that every other player wouldn't have said?


Funny cause I'm sure Roy Keane admitted to twating Haaland.
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 44317
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:47 pm

Mase wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit

What did he say afterwards that every other player wouldn't have said?


Funny cause I'm sure Roy Keane admitted to twating Haaland.


Didn't he also write about it ??
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby patrickblue » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:01 pm

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
Mase wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit

What did he say afterwards that every other player wouldn't have said?


Funny cause I'm sure Roy Keane admitted to twating Haaland.


Didn't he also write about it ??


Not him, I doubt he can write.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
User avatar
patrickblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Newbury Berks
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: The one and only Goat

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mase » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:02 pm

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
Mase wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Dub City wrote:So big nose has accepted the ban. Surely that goes against his interview after the match claiming no intent and the player jumping into his elbow. Or does this just confirm what we already knew that the prick is full of shit

What did he say afterwards that every other player wouldn't have said?


Funny cause I'm sure Roy Keane admitted to twating Haaland.


Didn't he also write about it ??


I remember McAteer taking the piss out of him for doing so.

I'm sure big Dunc didn't try and hide the fact he nutted the lad up in Scotland when he got sent down either.
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 44317
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:22 pm

Saul Goodman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Both will be banned. Mings longer than Zlatan. Dont worry. Itll be okay

Just like i expected. Club and player bias aside, the FA got this spot on


Did they fuck, where's Twatan's charge for his attempted stamp?

I wasnt aware they were banning for attempted foul play.

Mings challenge was worse so he gets a longer ban. Makes sense to me.


Are you on the wind up? Are you saying because his stamp missed he should just get away with it?
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:40 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Both will be banned. Mings longer than Zlatan. Dont worry. Itll be okay

Just like i expected. Club and player bias aside, the FA got this spot on


Did they fuck, where's Twatan's charge for his attempted stamp?

I wasnt aware they were banning for attempted foul play.

Mings challenge was worse so he gets a longer ban. Makes sense to me.


Are you on the wind up? Are you saying because his stamp missed he should just get away with it?


It's akin to saying that someone spit at the referee (understandable, I know) but because he missed, everything was OK.
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Slim » Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:08 pm

You get a redcard for tackles that the other player avoids(that would have been a red if they'd connected). I see no problem with charging him for the stamp.

However that elbow, I seem to remember a certain City fullback getting slapped hard for an elbow to the head. This one had all the same intent.
Image
User avatar
Slim
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 30344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:57 am
Location: Perth

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Saul Goodman » Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:52 pm

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:
Saul Goodman wrote:Both will be banned. Mings longer than Zlatan. Dont worry. Itll be okay

Just like i expected. Club and player bias aside, the FA got this spot on

Did they fuck, where's Twatan's charge for his attempted stamp?

I wasnt aware they were banning for attempted foul play.

Mings challenge was worse so he gets a longer ban. Makes sense to me.

Are you on the wind up? Are you saying because his stamp missed he should just get away with it?

Im not on the wind up. I have a different opinion than you. That doesnt mean im trying to wind you up. Whether you get wound up by my opinion is on you.

And yes thats what im saying. I don't understand why he should be punished for something (a stamp) that he didnt do. He got punished for the elbow and thats what shouldve happened.
User avatar
Saul Goodman
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 5:18 am
Location: Toronto
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bernardo Silva

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby john@staustell » Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:44 am

Slim wrote:You get a redcard for tackles that the other player avoids(that would have been a red if they'd connected). I see no problem with charging him for the stamp.

However that elbow, I seem to remember a certain City fullback getting slapped hard for an elbow to the head. This one had all the same intent.


Not really mate. That one knocked him nearly out the ground.

However I do agree there are at least 3 things that should be looked at, including falling over to try and get a player sent off
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20290
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Wed Mar 08, 2017 7:40 am

Saul Goodman wrote:Im not on the wind up. I have a different opinion than you. That doesnt mean im trying to wind you up. Whether you get wound up by my opinion is on you.

And yes thats what im saying. I don't understand why he should be punished for something (a stamp) that he didnt do. He got punished for the elbow and thats what shouldve happened.


He didn't do?

If someone threw a punch at you and missed does that mean they didn't throw a punch?

Anyhow, it's about time this cunt got a ban, hopefully the refs will smarten up to his antics after this, although I won't hold my breath.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Mase » Wed Mar 08, 2017 7:43 am

john@staustell wrote:
Slim wrote:You get a redcard for tackles that the other player avoids(that would have been a red if they'd connected). I see no problem with charging him for the stamp.

However that elbow, I seem to remember a certain City fullback getting slapped hard for an elbow to the head. This one had all the same intent.


Not really mate. That one knocked him nearly out the ground.

However I do agree there are at least 3 things that should be looked at, including falling over to try and get a player sent off


I'd say Zlatan's was more dangerous as it was with the actual elbow rather than Thatcher's forarm. Example - when Morgan elbowed Hume.
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 44317
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby london blue 2 » Wed Mar 08, 2017 7:58 am

Some wonderful blue tints on here. Anyone who thinks that zlatans elbow was worse than thatchers must be on pills.

One of the worst "challenges" I've ever seen.
london blue 2
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10339
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:32 am
Location: london
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Retrospective bans

Postby Foreverinbluedreams » Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:32 am

london blue 2 wrote:Some wonderful blue tints on here. Anyone who thinks that zlatans elbow was worse than thatchers must be on pills.

One of the worst "challenges" I've ever seen.


Twatan does that type of follow through with the forearm raised regularly, he's just lucky he hasn't Mendesed anyone.
Foreverinbluedreams
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9224
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:34 pm
Supporter of: Euthanasia

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests