The mancityfans.net football forum

Wow i did not see this coming .Falcao hmmmm that would be sick option's of strikers.

Cit.revenge wrote:Wow i did not see this coming .Falcao hmmmm that would be sick option's of strikers.

Not only did you not see it coming, but you didn't see it going either ;-)

Ted Hughes wrote:

Cit.revenge wrote:Wow i did not see this coming .Falcao hmmmm that would be sick option's of strikers.

Not only did you not see it coming, but you didn't see it going either ;-)

Well it seams rags are somehow and i really don't know how are bringing him. If that is true, Falcao has some really strange choices...It says 65 mill transfer salary 9 mill for a year or loan for 10 to 12 mill with right to buy for above amount.

Cit.revenge wrote:

Ted Hughes wrote:

Cit.revenge wrote:Wow i did not see this coming .Falcao hmmmm that would be sick option's of strikers.

Not only did you not see it coming, but you didn't see it going either ;-)

Well it seams rags are somehow and i really don't know how are bringing him. If that is true, Falcao has some really strange choices...It says 65 mill transfer salary 9 mill for a year or loan for 10 to 12 mill with right to buy for above amount.

May be he hates the Champions League? After all he signed for Monaco when they weren't in it - I expect him to join QPR next season if the Rags finish top 4.

fuck him anyway. he's 29, he will be 30 when he finishes his loan move. let the rags then sign him for 5 years.

Talksport saying hes not going anywhere.. sorted.

Lee_R wrote:Talksport saying hes not going anywhere.. sorted.

Apart from his form, of course.

so his "move to Valencia" was either bullshit or conditional on the Falcao deal?

According to Ian Cheeseman half an hour ago, it's still looking on.

He also said last night that he thought the Falcao stuff was coming from his agent.

If Valencia are willing to pay £25m then I can see why our leaders will be tempted. At 29 we are nt going to be offered that again. If he is nt going to be fit until October then we are only 3 months from the next transfer window. Also, Yaya could play behind a front one if necessary with the two Ferns in central mid. I also get the impression the Beast is very keen to go home.

So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

A loan deal with a clause for a permanent switch dependant on him regaining full fitness would certainly make more sense than a full transfer in this window.
As a buying club I would wait until January for him though.

sheblue wrote:So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

Could we loan Villa from NYFC If Negrado goes ?

carolina-blue wrote:

sheblue wrote:So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

Could we loan Villa from NYFC If Negrado goes ?

Past it.

South Stand Balti wrote:If Valencia are willing to pay £25m then I can see why our leaders will be tempted. At 29 we are nt going to be offered that again. If he is nt going to be fit until October then we are only 3 months from the next transfer window. Also, Yaya could play behind a front one if necessary with the two Ferns in central mid. I also get the impression the Beast is very keen to go home.

Yep. Rightly or wrongly, FFP is a big part of our finance for a year or two. After that I reckon wewill be in substantial profit. As such £20+m must be considered

sheblue wrote:

carolina-blue wrote:

sheblue wrote:So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

Could we loan Villa from NYFC If Negrado goes ?

Past it.

Well past it, about 10,000 mile to be precise now he plays for Melbourne City ;-)

sheblue wrote:

carolina-blue wrote:

sheblue wrote:So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

Could we loan Villa from NYFC If Negrado goes ?

Past it.

You have a point .but as 4th choice with games coming thick and fast. I think he could do a good job I was just wondering if we could. Or not .

Beefymcfc wrote:

sheblue wrote:

carolina-blue wrote:

sheblue wrote:So were going to be happy with three strikers after years of listening to we NEEDED four.

A change for pelligrini to play one up with yaya behind.

Could we loan Villa from NYFC If Negrado goes ?

Past it.

Well past it, about 10,000 mile to be precise now he plays for Melbourne City ;-)

Oh your cruel!,...didn't want to point that out. Anyway not an option, past it years ago evenwhen we were linked with him a few years back.The three will be fine, really! glass calfs and paper hamstrings and all.....
Be nice to big ed.

So it looks like this ones almost tied up.. what are the chances that he goes out on loan but we have a recall option if we get injuries?..

3 experianced strikers is a concern, but when one has regular injuries throughout the season, anouther was out most of last season - that could be a real problem.