Page 19 of 584

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:06 pm
by Cocacolajojo1
Fair enough, but his opinion is as valid as as my 5 year old grand-daughters, if there is nothing to back it up but the voices in his head.


TBF, I hear Graham Hunter's voice in my head as well. It can happen to the best of them.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:35 pm
by Beefymcfc
Fuck me, if we're taking the word of Graham Hunter then there's something wrong, even if it is just his opinion. This lad is rent-a-gob for whoever will pay the money, and that means whatever they want him to say.

As a Spanish based so called journo, why isn't he going with the rumours from his own territory rather than giving his opinion on something he has no knowledge off whatsoever?

Wherever Pep ends up, even if he stays put, it's obvious that the media don't do journalism, they prefer rumour and gossip mongering to sell their wares. And who better to sell it to than the shallow know nothing single brain celled thick fuckers such as the Rags.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:02 pm
by Hutch's Shoulder
Well, my source, (the cat, who is ITK) reports was that what Pep actually said was that if he managed in the PL he wants to go to Old Trafford and get a result like Roberto. The press cut the last bit off.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 8:58 pm
by zuricity
From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:05 pm
by nottsblue
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Boro is to be fair. 36000 there. Though I sincerely doubt he mentioned the rags attendance in the last round, 40k was it?

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:12 pm
by Beefymcfc
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

A Rag Blogger who somehow got a job with the Beeb with tax payers money. You can see why the twats hired him.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:19 pm
by zuricity
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Boro is to be fair. 36000 there. Though I sincerely doubt he mentioned the rags attendance in the last round, 40k was it?



BBC site says 31,600 approx.

Capacity 34 ,742

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:27 pm
by nottsblue
zuricity wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Boro is to be fair. 36000 there. Though I sincerely doubt he mentioned the rags attendance in the last round, 40k was it?



BBC site says 31,600 approx.

Capacity 34 ,742

That's Sky for you then. That fucker Walsh obviously can't add up

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:33 pm
by zuricity
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Boro is to be fair. 36000 there. Though I sincerely doubt he mentioned the rags attendance in the last round, 40k was it?



BBC site says 31,600 approx.

Capacity 34 ,742

That's Sky for you then. That fucker Walsh obviously can't add up


Kin ell notts..... don't ever believe anything on either Murdoch's crap media channels or talkshit-e.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 9:36 pm
by nottsblue
zuricity wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
zuricity wrote:From the BBC sports radio web site a certain tosser,
one Mr. Shamoon Hafez, informs us that there are lots of empty seats at the Etihad where City are leading against Hull.

So Mr Smarty ass Shamoon Hafez, are Boro and Stoke sell outs ?

Boro is to be fair. 36000 there. Though I sincerely doubt he mentioned the rags attendance in the last round, 40k was it?



BBC site says 31,600 approx.

Capacity 34 ,742

That's Sky for you then. That fucker Walsh obviously can't add up


Kin ell notts..... don't ever believe anything on either Murdoch's crap media channels or talkshit-e.

Schoolboy error. My head is duly bowed

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:14 pm
by iwasthere2012
So they'll be praying for a scouse final I'm sure.
Hope ourselves and Stoke spoil the party.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:34 pm
by City64
Sickening dipper spunkfest on Sky tonight , I have had to turn the appalling shite off !!!!!!

Imagine if they actually ever won anything ??????

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:10 pm
by plf blue
City64 wrote:Sickening dipper spunkfest on Sky tonight , I have had to turn the appalling shite off !!!!!!

Imagine if they actually ever won anything ??????

hope it never happens growing to hate the dippers as much as the rags

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 12:21 am
by PeterParker
http://www.goal.com/en/news/1862/premie ... paign=enfb


Trash. Trash. TRASH.

What a title, my God, what a title.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 12:50 am
by Wonderwall
PeterParker wrote:http://www.goal.com/en/news/1862/premier-league/2015/12/02/17943972/aguero-hints-at-man-city-exit-i-wont-sign-a-new-deal?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=enfb


Trash. Trash. TRASH.

What a title, my God, what a title.


Now that's trolling journalism

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:46 am
by phips
explain

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:56 am
by Slim
Wonderwall wrote:
PeterParker wrote:http://www.goal.com/en/news/1862/premier-league/2015/12/02/17943972/aguero-hints-at-man-city-exit-i-wont-sign-a-new-deal?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=enfb


Trash. Trash. TRASH.

What a title, my God, what a title.


Now that's trolling journalism


He may not sign a new contract four years from now?

That's staying ahead of the story.

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:54 am
by Original Dub
phips wrote:explain


You explain.

Why you're still on this forum. You absolute cunt

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 12:24 pm
by Foreverinbluedreams
phips wrote:explain


Explain what exactly?

Re: Football Media

PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 2:16 pm
by bigblue
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
phips wrote:explain


Explain what exactly?


I think he wants someone to explain why it's bad journalism practice to have a headline that doesn't match the story. Normally this is common sense to most people. Like how the name of a menu item is supposed to match the dish you are served. Or how if someone calls themselves a City fan, you expect their opinions on football to be in favor of Manchester City.