The mancityfans.net football forum

sheblue wrote:Jesus out for another 6 weeks, Aguero who knows how long.
We should be signing a striker Jan who can do a job for us.

Such bad planning at the club. Who is going to take the fall for it?

Mase wrote:

sheblue wrote:Jesus out for another 6 weeks, Aguero who knows how long.
We should be signing a striker Jan who can do a job for us.

Such bad planning at the club. Who is going to take the fall for it?

It is bad, very bad planning.
Imagine the 60 mill we didnt need to spend on mahrez, imagine that money was put towards a striker.

sheblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

sheblue wrote:Jesus out for another 6 weeks, Aguero who knows how long.
We should be signing a striker Jan who can do a job for us.

Such bad planning at the club. Who is going to take the fall for it?

It is bad, very bad planning.
Imagine the 60 mill we didnt need to spend on mahrez, imagine that money was put towards a striker.

Could have had Haaland for half of that. The club don’t seem to care about a striker for some reason.

I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

I think is different, Chelsea did not buy anything for what? One year? They had a lot of income during that time from the players they keep on loaning + 80 mil from Hazard to Madrid.

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

I think is different, Chelsea did not buy anything for what? One year? They had a lot of income during that time from the players they keep on loaning + 80 mil from Hazard to Madrid.

Yep, true.

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

I think is different, Chelsea did not buy anything for what? One year? They had a lot of income during that time from the players they keep on loaning + 80 mil from Hazard to Madrid.

I don't. I think it's a clear sign that someone else will be in charge next season and he will have big money to spend. We signed a young centre half that was needed for this season and someone who will be at the club long after Pep. They reckoned they could get away without signing a striker this year so a big marquee signing comes in next season. You know who.

Looking at the wage bill - out went Silva, Otters, Sane and Bravo (paid as high as most first-team keepers). That's a huge chunk of change kicking about.

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

I think is different, Chelsea did not buy anything for what? One year? They had a lot of income during that time from the players they keep on loaning + 80 mil from Hazard to Madrid.

I don't. I think it's a clear sign that someone else will be in charge next season and he will have big money to spend. We signed a young centre half that was needed for this season and someone who will be at the club long after Pep. They reckoned they could get away without signing a striker this year so a big marquee signing comes in next season. You know who.

Looking at the wage bill - out went Silva, Otters, Sane and Bravo (paid as high as most first-team keepers). That's a huge chunk of change kicking about.

I go with this. Almost transition.

ross.mcfc wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:I think is has something to do to FFP why we didn't buy all what we needed.
I can't think of anything else.

I thought that initially, then I think about what Chelsea spent this summer and none of it makes sense

I think is different, Chelsea did not buy anything for what? One year? They had a lot of income during that time from the players they keep on loaning + 80 mil from Hazard to Madrid.

I don't. I think it's a clear sign that someone else will be in charge next season and he will have big money to spend. We signed a young centre half that was needed for this season and someone who will be at the club long after Pep. They reckoned they could get away without signing a striker this year so a big marquee signing comes in next season. You know who.

Looking at the wage bill - out went Silva, Otters, Sane and Bravo (paid as high as most first-team keepers). That's a huge chunk of change kicking about.

This is also true, but I wonder if the board managed/wanted to extend Baldies contract, or Lyon was the last straw that broke the camels back for them.

I am thinking that we are still a bit afraid of FFT and even if we fucked UEFA, I think we are expecting they will come again after us, that is why we are not open that much to break the banks.
But if you think about it, we never did. We never payed more that 80 mil for anyone and still people say we ruined the marked.

We played 70 mil for Aguero and Silva ffs.

Yeah Micah, just what we need....

Sturridge ffs

Simister wrote:Yeah Micah, just what we need....

Sturridge ffs

Replace two injured players with another injured player. Micah looking after his mate haha.

Mase wrote:

Simister wrote:Yeah Micah, just what we need....

Sturridge ffs

Replace two injured players with another injured player. Micah looking after his mate haha.

He’s probably had a few quid on it

Never liked Sturridge.

Hazy2 wrote:Never liked Sturridge.

+1

dave watson's perm wrote:

Hazy2 wrote:Never liked Sturridge.

+1

+2

Absolute cunt with an attitude to boot.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

dave watson's perm wrote:

Hazy2 wrote:Never liked Sturridge.

+1

+2

Absolute cunt with an attitude to boot.

First billy big bollocks I can remember here?
Us, chelsea and scouse cannot all have been wrong with this knob. Its s big fuck off no from me

No chance of messi if pep goes (not arsed)

Fuck Messi.

Agree