
blue wine wrote:Audi cup!
Bleed_Blue wrote:Wondering how entertaining will Pellagrini be, does anyone know how many goals do his team score in each match on an average.



ashton287 wrote:The premier league. With at last 3 games left of the season.
FA or carling cup.
Champions league semi final.
Otherwise he can FUCK OFF.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:
You should go on one of those holistic courses.

Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.


Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.
It has to be a great showing in the CL and at least make a fight of it for the PL title.Next season will be a lot more fuckign difficult to win it than this season was as it was just us and the Munchens , you can guarantee Chelsea will be more of a threat next season and I wouldnt discount Arsenal as well.


Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
It has to be a great showing in the CL and at least make a fight of it for the PL title.Next season will be a lot more fuckign difficult to win it than this season was as it was just us and the Munchens , you can guarantee Chelsea will be more of a threat next season and I wouldnt discount Arsenal as well.
Chopper wrote:
Surely he would have to win the league and get past the group stage right?


Risby wrote:Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.carl_feedthegoat wrote:
It has to be a great showing in the CL and at least make a fight of it for the PL title.Next season will be a lot more fuckign difficult to win it than this season was as it was just us and the Munchens , you can guarantee Chelsea will be more of a threat next season and I wouldnt discount Arsenal as well.Chopper wrote:
Surely he would have to win the league and get past the group stage right?
Absolutely. Otherwise why get rid of Bob. That just wouldn't make sense.
The new guy will be given everything he wants, but will be expected to bring immediate success.

Ted Hughes wrote:
Yeah we really will sack every manager who doesn't win the league.
Get real ffs.
It was an excuse, because they've decided he's not the bloke they want in the job, just like the Hughes 'trajectory' bullshit was an excuse.
If the next bloke fits the profile & keeps us competitive, they will be patient with him, if not, he will go.

Ted Hughes wrote:Risby wrote:Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.carl_feedthegoat wrote:
It has to be a great showing in the CL and at least make a fight of it for the PL title.Next season will be a lot more fuckign difficult to win it than this season was as it was just us and the Munchens , you can guarantee Chelsea will be more of a threat next season and I wouldnt discount Arsenal as well.Chopper wrote:
Surely he would have to win the league and get past the group stage right?
Absolutely. Otherwise why get rid of Bob. That just wouldn't make sense.
The new guy will be given everything he wants, but will be expected to bring immediate success.
Yeah we really will sack every manager who doesn't win the league.
Get real ffs.
It was an excuse, because they've decided he's not the bloke they want in the job, just like the Hughes 'trajectory' bullshit was an excuse.
If the next bloke fits the profile & keeps us competitive, they will be patient with him, if not, he will go.


Risby wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:
Yeah we really will sack every manager who doesn't win the league.
Get real ffs.
It was an excuse, because they've decided he's not the bloke they want in the job, just like the Hughes 'trajectory' bullshit was an excuse.
If the next bloke fits the profile & keeps us competitive, they will be patient with him, if not, he will go.
Wenger is competitive!
We want to be more than that.
You would be happy with coming 2nd, not coming out of the group stages and losing cup finals as long as we are competitive. I'm not sure you would.

Chopper wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:Risby wrote:Risby wrote:To get rid of Mancini and then not have high expectations of the next manager would be totally wrong.
It has to be the PL title and/or escape the group stage at the CL. Anything short of this can only be seen as a disappointment, especially if vast amounts of money is going to be spent as well.carl_feedthegoat wrote:
It has to be a great showing in the CL and at least make a fight of it for the PL title.Next season will be a lot more fuckign difficult to win it than this season was as it was just us and the Munchens , you can guarantee Chelsea will be more of a threat next season and I wouldnt discount Arsenal as well.Chopper wrote:
Surely he would have to win the league and get past the group stage right?
Absolutely. Otherwise why get rid of Bob. That just wouldn't make sense.
The new guy will be given everything he wants, but will be expected to bring immediate success.
Yeah we really will sack every manager who doesn't win the league.
Get real ffs.
It was an excuse, because they've decided he's not the bloke they want in the job, just like the Hughes 'trajectory' bullshit was an excuse.
If the next bloke fits the profile & keeps us competitive, they will be patient with him, if not, he will go.
Exactly.
This is really about Txiki Begiristain and Ferran Soriano running things. Everything else is a smokescreen in my opinion.

Cocacolajojo wrote:Socrates wrote:First season should be free i.e. no expectations other than avoiding disaster (Champs League qualification is the one "must").
This nothing else. Everything above that is a bonus. I want a good challenge for the league but because it'll be his first year there will be plenty of mistakes imo.

Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 224 guests