Page 13 of 13

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:06 am
by johnny crossan
"City had been keen for their leading scorer to keep a low profile this week and the club are deeply frustrated with their player, as well as being angry with the role that his adviser, Kia Joorabchian, is perceived to have played in an interview that also included Tevez questioning the wisdom of Mark Hughes's sacking. Joorabchian has been representing Hughes for the last two months and his once-strong working relationship with City's chief executive, Garry Cook, has deteriorated to the point that sources at the club say the businessman is no longer even welcome in the players' lounge. City's frustration with Tevez stems largely from the fact that they see him as too easily influenced and as a result he has enhanced his reputation as one of the more controversial players in the Premier League."


from today's Guardian - the shadow of Hughes still darkens Carrington

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:14 am
by Slim
johnny crossan wrote:
"City had been keen for their leading scorer to keep a low profile this week and the club are deeply frustrated with their player, as well as being angry with the role that his adviser, Kia Joorabchian, is perceived to have played in an interview that also included Tevez questioning the wisdom of Mark Hughes's sacking. Joorabchian has been representing Hughes for the last two months and his once-strong working relationship with City's chief executive, Garry Cook, has deteriorated to the point that sources at the club say the businessman is no longer even welcome in the players' lounge. City's frustration with Tevez stems largely from the fact that they see him as too easily influenced and as a result he has enhanced his reputation as one of the more controversial players in the Premier League."


from today's Guardian - the shadow of Hughes still darkens Carrington


We always knew Kia Joorabchian was a snake in the grass though, no surprises here.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:43 pm
by btajim
johnny crossan wrote:
"City had been keen for their leading scorer to keep a low profile this week and the club are deeply frustrated with their player, as well as being angry with the role that his adviser, Kia Joorabchian, is perceived to have played in an interview that also included Tevez questioning the wisdom of Mark Hughes's sacking. Joorabchian has been representing Hughes for the last two months and his once-strong working relationship with City's chief executive, Garry Cook, has deteriorated to the point that sources at the club say the businessman is no longer even welcome in the players' lounge. City's frustration with Tevez stems largely from the fact that they see him as too easily influenced and as a result he has enhanced his reputation as one of the more controversial players in the Premier League."


from today's Guardian - the shadow of Hughes still darkens Carrington


Kia Joorabchian has been representing Hughes? That's interesting stuff.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:29 pm
by Nick
fuck off kia.

And bad move hughes if you were behind that!

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:53 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
johnny crossan wrote:
"City had been keen for their leading scorer to keep a low profile this week and the club are deeply frustrated with their player, as well as being angry with the role that his adviser, Kia Joorabchian, is perceived to have played in an interview that also included Tevez questioning the wisdom of Mark Hughes's sacking. Joorabchian has been representing Hughes for the last two months and his once-strong working relationship with City's chief executive, Garry Cook, has deteriorated to the point that sources at the club say the businessman is no longer even welcome in the players' lounge. City's frustration with Tevez stems largely from the fact that they see him as too easily influenced and as a result he has enhanced his reputation as one of the more controversial players in the Premier League."


from today's Guardian - the shadow of Hughes still darkens Carrington


Who is surprised to see that this Rag twat is trying to cause problems to us in this extremely important time for the Club?

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:03 am
by Douglas Higginbottom
So on this occasion you choose to fully believe what is in the press :) Can't think why? :)

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:06 am
by Niall Quinns Discopants
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:So on this occasion you choose to fully believe what is in the press :) Can't think why? :)


??????

So are you trying to say Tevez didn't say things he did? There was also Bellamy moaning before the Derby about Hughes sacking. Great attitude and spirit before Derby.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:08 am
by Douglas Higginbottom
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:So on this occasion you choose to fully believe what is in the press :) Can't think why? :)


??????

So are you trying to say Tevez didn't say things he did? There was also Bellamy moaning before the Derby about Hughes sacking. Great attitude and spirit before Derby.


Haha red rags always work.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:20 pm
by john68
Antti,
At what point will you realise that thr rag media are more than happy to publish shit to whip stuff up and unsettle City..and at what point will you stop picking it up and going with it?

Sorry mate, but it is no coincidence that it is derby week...It'll get worse the more we challenge them.
...and expect the "The natural order in World football has been returned" reports after the game. It's exactly what they said in 1968.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:58 am
by MaineRoadMemories
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 638822.stm

If you have a spare 6 mins have a watch. Pleased that both Hughes and Bowen haven't come out and had a go at the club. They have remained professional.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:38 pm
by King Kev
I can't believe this thread is still alive! I only started it to make a point, well that backfired didn't it!

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:29 pm
by Slim
King Kev wrote:I can't believe this thread is still alive! I only started it to make a point, well that backfired didn't it!


Your momma.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:36 pm
by King Kev
Indeed.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:42 pm
by gillie
King Kev wrote:I can't believe this thread is still alive! I only started it to make a point, well that backfired didn't it!

Get rid then Lee you know you want to.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:03 pm
by King Kev
gillie wrote:
King Kev wrote:I can't believe this thread is still alive! I only started it to make a point, well that backfired didn't it!

Get rid then Lee you know you want to.
Nah, probably best all round if we keep all the obsessives together in one place.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:38 am
by john68
King Ethelred the Unready
King Alfred the Great
King Edward the Confessor
King William the Conqueror
King Richard the Lionheart..........and now......

KING KEV THE OBSESSED!!!!....you love it Mate.

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:55 am
by King Kev
john68 wrote:King Ethelred the Unready
King Alfred the Great
King Edward the Confessor
King William the Conqueror
King Richard the Lionheart..........and now......

KING KEV THE OBSESSED!!!!....you love it Mate.
Eh????

Re: The hughes Thread

PostPosted: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:28 pm
by Dameerto
Have there been any stories linking him with Hamburg yet?