zuricity wrote:blackburnblue wrote:beggars belief!!!
Arguably our best result since winning at the shit hole two years ago and we're bloody wingeing.
That second half performance was a well as we've played all season imo.
I thought the performance in both halves was great. Chelsea applied a lot of pressure in the first half. The way some people
react ( for example that prize prat , Hansen, on MOTD) you would think we were awful until they scored, which simply was not the case.
Also Barry's chip to Bellamy has been described as a long kick up to a front man. Bellamy was in our half when Barry made the chip.
Agreed. But its also how you want to interpret the first half. Some like Hansen and most on here think it was dire and dismal; Kamaracommentating at the time thought it was an intriguing tactical battle. I read one report echoing Kamara and another saying it was rubbish.
There is one thing that is true though and that we played like the way we did in the first 30 mins because that was what Mancini told them to do. Keep it tight, frustrate them, and then we look for something on the break. And we did frustrate them allowing them little in the way of clear chances until they made that decisive chance which we cancelled out quickly.
The ironic thing is that we did to Chelsea what Chelsea did to Arsenal at the Bridge. Wenger complained that his side played all the football and he was right in terms of possession and territory. Chelsea just sat back whilst Arsenal got busy being busy and than passed the ball to Drogba who scored two 1st half goals and the game was over. Clinical, efficient and easy.
We sat back, Chelsea pressed forward (cautiously to begin with I thought) and then finally worked an opening. We cleared the ball to Tevez who did what Drogba does and bullied the back two and scored a goal. Which is why forwards like Tevez are priceless and Benjani is playing for Sunderland. We also niggled Chelsea in that 1st half by the way we played and that carried on and got worse in the second. They pressed, we dealt with it comfortably (again) and Barry passed a sweet ball to Bellers who scored a sweet goal and saved himself a twatting from Tevez for not passing. Then it got tasty as having frustrated them and now gone ahead we went for the kill with SWP injecting fresh pace into the attack and got our just rewards with the penalty. We then swapped Bridge for Santa Cruz when 3-1 up at Chelsea (its a crazy world) but it was classic stuff, frustrate, wound, then close in and go for the kill.
But the thing is boys and girls you don't get the second bit without the first bit. You don't swan over to Chelsea and start pressing forward from the off because as Arsenal found out you gonna get screwed without the lube. You may not like the way Mancini plans his matches and as he found at Stoke when he tried to combat that much different threat it ain't always going to work but I prefer the manager to have a plan in the first place.
Mancini as a manger is alien to us and quite possibly alien to some of the players as well because I would be amazed if some of them ain't scratching their heads trying to figure all this out or as Shay put it 'the lads just want to play football', but I'll give them their due in that misgivings or not and based on the last 3 games they are certainly trying 100% to deliver on what Mancini wants.