Tru_Blu wrote:Reading were trash. City are the same old team that lacks the killer instinct in the final third. Ok fair enough if my owners think Mancini reach his ceiling but come off it you guys thinking that today was some big turn around.
Fesan wrote:Why no Guidetti or Suarez yet?:-(
Beefymcfc wrote:Carl's new thing, Post Match Thread's. I like it.
zuricity wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:Carl's new thing, Post Match Thread's. I like it.
Has he buggered off to the beach again ?
Dunnylad wrote:As we are now secure in second shouldn't we ditch half that side tonight and stick some kids in from the start with a load more on the bench? Not an entire team, but surely the likes of Razak & Saurez should be given a run out?
Ted Hughes wrote:A lot of disappointed people on here because we played well.
Of course, had we been playing a well organised counter attacking side like Dortmund, or the rags, we would have been hammered, but we weren't playing those, we were playing Reading, who were utter shite. Our finishing was also gash, as well as our defending of set pieces.
Doesn't change the fact that City played with a fluency & at times inspiration which has been missing for much of this season, & if some of you fuckers weren't so utterly stuck up Mancini's fucking arse, you would be pleased to see the same group of players have not lost it, & gain some hope for next season, rather than worrying that it could show your lord and master in a bad light.
It wasn't the end product, but it was very encouraging: you agenda ridden cunts.
Dameerto wrote:ross.mcfc wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:
We were playing for league position and for a Golden Glove
Ted Hughes wrote:A lot of disappointed people on here because we played well.
Of course, had we been playing a well organised counter attacking side like Dortmund, or the rags, we would have been hammered, but we weren't playing those, we were playing Reading, who were utter shite. Our finishing was also gash, as well as our defending of set pieces.
Doesn't change the fact that City played with a fluency & at times inspiration which has been missing for much of this season, & if some of you fuckers weren't so utterly stuck up Mancini's fucking arse, you would be pleased to see the same group of players have not lost it, & gain some hope for next season, rather than worrying that it could show your lord and master in a bad light.
It wasn't the end product, but it was very encouraging: you agenda ridden cunts.
Ted Hughes wrote:A lot of disappointed people on here because we played well.
Of course, had we been playing a well organised counter attacking side like Dortmund, or the rags, we would have been hammered, but we weren't playing those, we were playing Reading, who were utter shite. Our finishing was also gash, as well as our defending of set pieces.
Doesn't change the fact that City played with a fluency & at times inspiration which has been missing for much of this season, & if some of you fuckers weren't so utterly stuck up Mancini's fucking arse, you would be pleased to see the same group of players have not lost it, & gain some hope for next season, rather than worrying that it could show your lord and master in a bad light.
It wasn't the end product, but it was very encouraging: you agenda ridden cunts.
paulh wrote:The amount of money they are on they should play well for anyone
paulh wrote:The amount of money they are on they should play well for anyone
Ted Hughes wrote:A lot of disappointed people on here because we played well.
Ted Hughes wrote:you agenda ridden cunts.
ross.mcfc wrote:
I saw two teams going through the motions in a meaningless game and our base line of not giving a fuck is much higher than theirs as it should be considering the costs of the the respective squads.
A 6-0 tonight is a clear sign. Winning 2-0 against a piss poor side who have longs since been relegated means nothing.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: ayrshireblue, Bluemoon4610, city72, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], zuricity and 168 guests