gillie wrote:Bluez wrote:uwe's_skyblue_duvet wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:Crossie wrote:RSC is plan B mate, and you saw it in all its glory from about the 75th minute
WORSE THAN SAMARAS.
FACT.
Ever tried coming on with 15 mins to go and making an impact in a football match? Not easy. He's not had a lot of playing time and think it's well harsh to single him out. I mean, worse than Samaras? !!?
Not worse than Samaras, but I am not sure he is good enough either. He hasn't had much playing time, but as the time has gone on he doesn't seem to be getting better either. I know he is still coming back from injury but then he should be playing in the reserves.
This thread also highlights another problem whenit comes to solutions, we have calls for Mourinho (ultra defensive boring football) and calls for more attacking football in the same thread. So which one should it be?
http://www.skysports.com/football/league/0,19540,11853,00.html
So Mourinho is boring?.
Yeah, it's a myth that he's boring. So far he's averaging 2.5 goals a game with inter. Where as we're averaging 1.8 goals a game. IS Inter's team that much better than ours? Don't think so.
