The mancityfans.net football forum

ant london wrote:He cost us all of 1.5million quid so I think that even with his limited use we've had some good use out of Javi. He's been a good pro and not whined about lack of action...nor is he explicitly agitating for a move. Hope that City will let him go free and maximise his deal at his new club

Certainly not one of the more economically unwise transfer moves by Svennis. There's only Elano to date that we've taken a (6 million quid) bath on when we sold him (but it's still to be seen what our final position will be on messrs Bojinov, Caicedo and Benjani.....we could be taking some hits on those lads).

Petrov only cost us 4.7m so even if we use him as a makeweight for Lescott/sell to Spurs for 3m or so we've done ok.

Corluka we made a small profit on, Gelson lost a couple of million, Bianchi a few million and obviously Geovanni was a freebie.

Not actually as bad as I thought it would be once I had a look....and obviously, it's small change to HRH.

irblinx wrote:
Did Elano go for £2m??

Bingo Lewis wrote:I prefer Gaz to Bridge TBH. At least he fucking tackles.
He was ace up until chrimbo when Bridge nicked his spot.

ant london wrote:

Bingo Lewis wrote:I prefer Gaz to Bridge TBH. At least he fucking tackles.
He was ace up until chrimbo when Bridge nicked his spot.

he was terrifying when he deputised for Bridge against either Aalborg or Copenhagen. Scared the bejaysus out of me how slow he was

No ta, get rid

Ted Hughes wrote:If this has been leaked from City then it means Worf's on his way here.

Bingo Lewis wrote: Its as if he needs to be playing week in week out to be playing at his best.

ant london wrote:

Bingo Lewis wrote: Its as if he needs to be playing week in week out to be playing at his best.

Fully agree with that part....for what it's worth, under Sven I would have preferred for us to stick with Javier rather than replacing him with Ball, I think that had he had more game time under his belt in that period we would have had a better player on our hands now and he wouldn't be on his way

Bingo Lewis wrote:

ant london wrote:

Bingo Lewis wrote: Its as if he needs to be playing week in week out to be playing at his best.

Fully agree with that part....for what it's worth, under Sven I would have preferred for us to stick with Javier rather than replacing him with Ball, I think that had he had more game time under his belt in that period we would have had a better player on our hands now and he wouldn't be on his way

Enough about Gaz anyway, I've still had no mail :( did you take a picture with it on?

ant london wrote:

Bingo Lewis wrote:

ant london wrote:

Bingo Lewis wrote: Its as if he needs to be playing week in week out to be playing at his best.

Fully agree with that part....for what it's worth, under Sven I would have preferred for us to stick with Javier rather than replacing him with Ball, I think that had he had more game time under his belt in that period we would have had a better player on our hands now and he wouldn't be on his way

Enough about Gaz anyway, I've still had no mail :( did you take a picture with it on?

Fret ye not, I have (the same) one myself that I shall photo me with about town soon

And your post shall arrive don't you worry mate