gillie wrote:Just a word on Pellegrini he has won the league in every country he has managed except Spain where he guided Real Madrid to a then record points total of 96 and only finished 2nd behind Barcelona.He also took little Villareal to the CL semi-final not to mention this season where with better refereeing decisions he would have done the same with Malaga.So all in all not a bad record for a nobody.
Bleed_Blue wrote:Wtf is with this :
"I categorically deny that I am the new Manchester City coach, nothing has been signed and no agreement reached," Pellegrini told the club's official website.
What does this mean, this is killing me now. Whose gonna be the coach ?
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Story is Barcelona want Pellegrini and leaked our interest in him to cause all this bollocks and get him to Camp Nou. Make of that what you will.
Bleed_Blue wrote:Wtf is with this :
"I categorically deny that I am the new Manchester City coach, nothing has been signed and no agreement reached," Pellegrini told the club's official website.
What does this mean, this is killing me now. Whose gonna be the coach ?
Bleed_Blue wrote:Wtf is with this :
"I categorically deny that I am the new Manchester City coach, nothing has been signed and no agreement reached," Pellegrini told the club's official website.
What does this mean, this is killing me now. Whose gonna be the coach ?
Lee_R wrote:"I can't get anything out of an orchestra if I have the 10 best guitarists but I don't have a pianist or a drummer"
- Manuel Pellegrini on his time at Real Madrid
Bleed_Blue wrote:Wtf is with this :
"I categorically deny that I am the new Manchester City coach, nothing has been signed and no agreement reached," Pellegrini told the club's official website.
What does this mean, this is killing me now. Whose gonna be the coach ?
Benjay wrote:maxxi wrote:the club runs by bunch of clowns, Kalddoon is a joker.
Pellegrini has flop written all over him. Can't wait
Ridiculous comment.
Bobby is not losing his job because of the results (although they have not helped).
He is losing his job because of his repeated criticism of the board over last summers missed signings, his public criticism of his players (Hart, Nasri and Kompany for starters), his stubborness in sticking by Ballotelli, his determination to stick with this 3 at the back formation but more than anything else he does not fit into the way the new management want to work. They want to buy the players and have the manager work with what they provide.
Bobby would never accept that. Pellegrini is more used to working that way.
Fans are slating Pellegrini because he is not a name. He will not excite the press, he will not sell papers - why? Because he will just get on with the job. They say he is understated but through that he gets respect.
I think bobby has lost respect from players and board (not fans) and that is why he is going. The results dont help but they are not the main reason.
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:That's basically why I've never like the whole director of football system. All the people upstairs have jobs for life whereas managers come and go all the time and are used as scapegoats whenever things go wrong. That's the system we are using from now and basically have been using for a while now with Marwood. Some of our own supporters don't get it though.
Cocacolajojo wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:That's basically why I've never like the whole director of football system. All the people upstairs have jobs for life whereas managers come and go all the time and are used as scapegoats whenever things go wrong. That's the system we are using from now and basically have been using for a while now with Marwood. Some of our own supporters don't get it though.
But the system calls for a middle layer of people doesn't it, like in Lyon. A group of people including the manager who makes the decisions together and then report to the chairman of the club. If on the other hand the chairman actually started deciding stuff and makes himself part of the initial decision making process and this a possible culprit when it comes to transfer evaluations, then the system is perverted and not really a director of football system any more.
Basically, if a director of football system isn't set up properly it holds the same possibilities for idiocy as letting the manager make all the decisions. But if you get a sporting director like the one in Napoli (which I think came to them from Genoa or Sampdoria), in Seville or the decision making group in Lyon during their prime, they you got a good thing going. Might as well throw in Palermo in that equation as well.
Having a sporting director means that you have to evaluate the sporting director You're assuming they won't. How can you be so sure of that?
Hazy2 wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:That's basically why I've never like the whole director of football system. All the people upstairs have jobs for life whereas managers come and go all the time and are used as scapegoats whenever things go wrong. That's the system we are using from now and basically have been using for a while now with Marwood. Some of our own supporters don't get it though.
But the system calls for a middle layer of people doesn't it, like in Lyon. A group of people including the manager who makes the decisions together and then report to the chairman of the club. If on the other hand the chairman actually started deciding stuff and makes himself part of the initial decision making process and this a possible culprit when it comes to transfer evaluations, then the system is perverted and not really a director of football system any more.
Basically, if a director of football system isn't set up properly it holds the same possibilities for idiocy as letting the manager make all the decisions. But if you get a sporting director like the one in Napoli (which I think came to them from Genoa or Sampdoria), in Seville or the decision making group in Lyon during their prime, they you got a good thing going. Might as well throw in Palermo in that equation as well.
Having a sporting director means that you have to evaluate the sporting director You're assuming they won't. How can you be so sure of that?
As we stand imho Berigistain is faced with Bobby, chucking him out of his office with a flea in his ear tables up-turned and stapler launched at him.... Berigistain has always called the shots at Barca when player purchase was concerned. Bob, was never gonna be on the same page, This has been coming. 1st RM said we need to act better and quicker than last season. 2nd "He said they are serious people and know what we need" 3 They have never said a word in response, but were caught having Dinner with a guy in Madrid, who happens to be the agent for Pelli or Isco. Silence is deadly..
Cocacolajojo wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Cocacolajojo wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:That's basically why I've never like the whole director of football system. All the people upstairs have jobs for life whereas managers come and go all the time and are used as scapegoats whenever things go wrong. That's the system we are using from now and basically have been using for a while now with Marwood. Some of our own supporters don't get it though.
But the system calls for a middle layer of people doesn't it, like in Lyon. A group of people including the manager who makes the decisions together and then report to the chairman of the club. If on the other hand the chairman actually started deciding stuff and makes himself part of the initial decision making process and this a possible culprit when it comes to transfer evaluations, then the system is perverted and not really a director of football system any more.
Basically, if a director of football system isn't set up properly it holds the same possibilities for idiocy as letting the manager make all the decisions. But if you get a sporting director like the one in Napoli (which I think came to them from Genoa or Sampdoria), in Seville or the decision making group in Lyon during their prime, they you got a good thing going. Might as well throw in Palermo in that equation as well.
Having a sporting director means that you have to evaluate the sporting director You're assuming they won't. How can you be so sure of that?
As we stand imho Berigistain is faced with Bobby, chucking him out of his office with a flea in his ear tables up-turned and stapler launched at him.... Berigistain has always called the shots at Barca when player purchase was concerned. Bob, was never gonna be on the same page, This has been coming. 1st RM said we need to act better and quicker than last season. 2nd "He said they are serious people and know what we need" 3 They have never said a word in response, but were caught having Dinner with a guy in Madrid, who happens to be the agent for Pelli or Isco. Silence is deadly..
Yeah of course, to be able to have a sporting director in place you need to have good communications and trust between the manager at the bottom and the board at the top. Obviously trust hasn't been a common occurence in our board room since the Swales days, an these things tend to remain despite changes in ownerships and changes in personnel.
You deffo need people who are not so much authoritarian at the top for this system to work. I'm not sure we've got this here. In a club like Barcelona you have the supporters as a possible check of balance when the board starts behaving in a non-purposeful way. We don't really have that, unless Khaldoons have spies or something placed in the club's infrastructure.
Twobob wrote:Sounds like a foreign Moyes to me, won fuck all but the media love him for what he's done on a 'small' budget, works well with average/mediocre players failed at a big club (Future of Moyes).
Twobob wrote:Sounds like a foreign Moyes to me, won fuck all but the media love him for what he's done on a 'small' budget, works well with average/mediocre players failed at a big club (Future of Moyes).
ross.mcfc wrote:
Last time I checked Moyes has not taken average/mediocre sides to the quarter and semi finals of the CL. His achievements with Villareal in the Champions league is the stuff of legends.
I repeat, I do not want Mancini sacked but the idea that Pellegrini is some unknown quantity who could not manage in the Premiership is utterly mad. There is life outside English football.
Twobob wrote:
Cross-breed Twitchy-Moyes then, sounds sexy
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: C & C, CTID Hants, Harry Dowd scored and 265 guests