Page 9 of 9

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:20 pm
by PrezIke
Ted who's his name?

I did enjoy reading the man's posts, so shame he's not on here now. Hope he returns, because yes, I like Blue Moon for certain things...mostly for their podcast which I do enjoy, but having to search through oodles of thread pages to find decent analysis/information, whilst having the same annoying video appear on each page (I know I could turn my adblocker on, but I generally prefer not to do that for sites of teams I support) is frustrating to say the least. I lurked there as a non-member for a while before joining a few years ago, but I have never posted their once. The Pogba thread is over 2000 pages long!

I've seen twosips posting in the EDS/Academy forum there, and figured I'd catch Ted on there as well, but he must be under some other nick, and I can't be bothered to figure it out. (Someone did ask earlier in this thread to no response as I recall)

Things seem slow here now, eh? It is the international break still, but now that I think about it...

A-Yo..Slim, my manz...when we gon' get the thread to predict the Palace match? It's less than two days away, bruh. Cheers.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 9:48 pm
by hongkongbluey
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 9:53 pm
by london blue 2
hongkongbluey wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in


Wouldn't put myself in any clique by a long stretch, but I'm not sure how a bunch of fans that have been posting on a forum for years on end are supposed to come across as not cliquey. Just the nature of posting regularly on a forum means you are likely to be perceived that way.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 9:57 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
hongkongbluey wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in


When you leave your local boozer to frequent another and you spot a group of locals that you wouldnt mind joining in with , you have to accept that, out of the group thats drinking, theres one or 2 cunts (Like me) that you dont really like but the rest of the lads are great......so you make a choice...join in or fuck off back to your local.

There will always be a cliquy feel to any forum where you have posters who have known each other for years (even if its in the cyber world)...its just the way it is.
Having said that ,I dont think there is a real cliquy group here on Mancityfans.net ,I dont exactly get on with anyone on here 100% and Ive been here since the year dot.

There you go.,

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:43 pm
by hongkongbluey
Fair points well made, wasn't meant as a criticism. Just responding to notts point really

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:47 pm
by london blue 2
hongkongbluey wrote:Fair points well made, wasn't meant as a criticism. Just responding to notts point really

Well seeing as you now ventured in I guess you're now part of the clique ;)

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:04 pm
by hongkongbluey
For my epic 50th post?

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:36 pm
by Pretty Boy Lee
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
hongkongbluey wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in


When you leave your local boozer to frequent another and you spot a group of locals that you wouldnt mind joining in with , you have to accept that, out of the group thats drinking, theres one or 2 cunts (Like me) that you dont really like but the rest of the lads are great......so you make a choice...join in or fuck off back to your local.

There will always be a cliquy feel to any forum where you have posters who have known each other for years (even if its in the cyber world)...its just the way it is.
Having said that ,I dont think there is a real cliquy group here on Mancityfans.net ,I dont exactly get on with anyone on here 100% and Ive been here since the year dot.

There you go.,



Spot on to be fair.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:51 pm
by KinkyKinkladze
Fair shout by Carl.

I'm a cunt who nobody on here is friends with, but although doomie may call me a twat or whoever, I stick around here because even if I am a twat, it's still conversation and people join in regardless. Plus the intelligence level is a far higher notch than fucking bluemoon. Jesus Christ does that place annoy me, it's as bad as rawk.

That's the drunken opinion of a low post nobody. In Carl's scenario, I'm the guy at the bar wishing that table would invite me over for some drinks. But generally glad I'm not, as I think I'll probably hate you all anyway.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:54 pm
by KinkyKinkladze
Regarding Ted Hughes, I'm just saying it's a bit suspicious that he goes missing around the same time those isis chaps killed by British dronds did.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 2:37 am
by dazby
Has anyone bothered to PM him yet?

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:27 am
by Dubciteh
dazby wrote:Has anyone bothered to PM him yet?


Yeah no response.

Anything could happen and no one would have a clue.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:49 am
by gillie
Well if Ruckspin prefers it on Bluemoon he deffo has had a brainfart.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 10:23 am
by Mase
Haha this thread has turned really....funny I guess.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:19 am
by Slim
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
hongkongbluey wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in


When you leave your local boozer to frequent another and you spot a group of locals that you wouldnt mind joining in with , you have to accept that, out of the group thats drinking, theres one or 2 cunts (Like me) that you dont really like but the rest of the lads are great......so you make a choice...join in or fuck off back to your local.

There will always be a cliquy feel to any forum where you have posters who have known each other for years (even if its in the cyber world)...its just the way it is.
Having said that ,I dont think there is a real cliquy group here on Mancityfans.net ,I dont exactly get on with anyone on here 100% and Ive been here since the year dot.

There you go.,


TBF though, you are a cunt.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 1:01 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Slim wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
hongkongbluey wrote:
nottsblue wrote:Just as a quick aside. All this concern over two posters and wondering about the levels of activity going down on the board. Had a quick gander at the members section earlier and there are 170 pages of members who have registered yet not made a single post. What's the fucking point of that. A further 20+ pages of posters with one post to their name. Come on people, if you read the posts and are registered, then join in.

As a non-stellar poster myself isn't this thread part of the issue? It all seems a bit too cliquey to venture in


When you leave your local boozer to frequent another and you spot a group of locals that you wouldnt mind joining in with , you have to accept that, out of the group thats drinking, theres one or 2 cunts (Like me) that you dont really like but the rest of the lads are great......so you make a choice...join in or fuck off back to your local.

There will always be a cliquy feel to any forum where you have posters who have known each other for years (even if its in the cyber world)...its just the way it is.
Having said that ,I dont think there is a real cliquy group here on Mancityfans.net ,I dont exactly get on with anyone on here 100% and Ive been here since the year dot.

There you go.,


TBF though, you are a cunt.


"Theres one or 2 cunts" , so Im obviously talking to you at the bar.

Re: ted hughes?!

PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:46 am
by craigmcfc
I've located him. BBC2 on Saturday night 9pm

Ted Hughes - Stronger Than Death