Page 8 of 17

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:24 am
by Ted Hughes
Image

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:30 am
by Beefymcfc
Slim wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:I thought maureen failed to win it when he did the double also or am I making that up?


Maureen has never won the LMA award, he won the Premier League Manager of the Season award both years he won the title.

And this was the guy who came in after Ranieri spent £120M to move Chelsea from 3rd to 2nd, spent another £100M to win the league and no-one talked about FFP, offered Ballack and Shevchenko £150k/week while we desperately broke our maximum wage structure of £30k/week to keep Anelka by paying him £40k/week, then broke it a year later to sign Robbie Fowler, a move that just about sent us broke and forced out our chairman David Bernstein...no mention of FFP then either.

Funny how when there were 4 seats at the trough, adding a fourth swine to the feeding frenzy that is the Champion's League wasn't a problem, but you add a 5th little piggy and the 1 in 4 chance that the filth, the scouse filth or the southern filth might miss out and all of a sudden FFP, with every reason under the sun for it's implementation but the actual truth.

Why the fuck don't they just come out and say it? Why don't they admit to moving the goalposts in order to keep their trotters in the swill of financial unfair money that has poured into the club for close to 20 years now? Why don't they admit they are the powerbrokers behind all the moves that hapless inept clueless wanderer Platini seems to be the point man on? Would it change anything? Would droves of their fans abandon the club because they found out they were this powerful? Their flock of mindless sheep fans went their for that exact reason in the first place, if anything they would gain more sycophantic saps who attach their personal success to the successes of the club they support.

Good to see you back mate.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:40 am
by Ted Hughes
Beefymcfc wrote:
Slim wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:I thought maureen failed to win it when he did the double also or am I making that up?


Maureen has never won the LMA award, he won the Premier League Manager of the Season award both years he won the title.

And this was the guy who came in after Ranieri spent £120M to move Chelsea from 3rd to 2nd, spent another £100M to win the league and no-one talked about FFP, offered Ballack and Shevchenko £150k/week while we desperately broke our maximum wage structure of £30k/week to keep Anelka by paying him £40k/week, then broke it a year later to sign Robbie Fowler, a move that just about sent us broke and forced out our chairman David Bernstein...no mention of FFP then either.

Funny how when there were 4 seats at the trough, adding a fourth swine to the feeding frenzy that is the Champion's League wasn't a problem, but you add a 5th little piggy and the 1 in 4 chance that the filth, the scouse filth or the southern filth might miss out and all of a sudden FFP, with every reason under the sun for it's implementation but the actual truth.

Why the fuck don't they just come out and say it? Why don't they admit to moving the goalposts in order to keep their trotters in the swill of financial unfair money that has poured into the club for close to 20 years now? Why don't they admit they are the powerbrokers behind all the moves that hapless inept clueless wanderer Platini seems to be the point man on? Would it change anything? Would droves of their fans abandon the club because they found out they were this powerful? Their flock of mindless sheep fans went their for that exact reason in the first place, if anything they would gain more sycophantic saps who attach their personal success to the successes of the club they support.

Good to see you back mate.


From reports I've heard regarding the content, I just hope he's not been watching Sunday Supplement today..

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:01 pm
by nottsblue
Ted Hughes wrote:Image

Surely not. Is that what trannies call 'eye candy'?

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:32 pm
by twosips
Ted Hughes wrote:Image


he just looks like any hipster you'd find in the northern quarter at some alt electro night

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:02 pm
by Hazy2
Sacked in the morning if not tonight , not a happy camper.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:12 pm
by Bianchi on Ice
Hazy2 wrote:Sacked in the morning if not tonight , not a happy camper.


Reading lost 6-1 yesterday, he could always go back there, as I said, to his real level

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:22 pm
by Dameerto
Always quick to take credit for the success, lets see if he takes the blame, I'm going to guess it's someone else's fault though. Maybe he can steal another Latin motto to inspire them.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:28 pm
by lovecity8utd
absens haeres non erit

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:29 pm
by Hazy2
Dameerto wrote:Always quick to take credit for the success, lets see if he takes the blame, I'm going to guess it's someone else's fault though. Maybe he can steal another Latin motto to inspire them.


Reminds me of David Moyes at the scum. Lost, finished and a matter of time before sacked.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:31 pm
by Bianchi on Ice
lovecity8utd wrote:absens haeres non erit


Is that latin for "wheres my P45"?

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:38 pm
by Blue Since 76
Haven't seen the game, just the result, but I'll be amazed if he's still there by the end of the transfer window. In fact, he'll be doing well to be there at the start.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:49 pm
by nottsblue
lovecity8utd wrote:absens haeres non erit

Nice

cacoethes carpendi

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:54 pm
by Moonchesteri
Slim wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:I thought maureen failed to win it when he did the double also or am I making that up?


Maureen has never won the LMA award, he won the Premier League Manager of the Season award both years he won the title.

And this was the guy who came in after Ranieri spent £120M to move Chelsea from 3rd to 2nd, spent another £100M to win the league and no-one talked about FFP, offered Ballack and Shevchenko £150k/week while we desperately broke our maximum wage structure of £30k/week to keep Anelka by paying him £40k/week, then broke it a year later to sign Robbie Fowler, a move that just about sent us broke and forced out our chairman David Bernstein...no mention of FFP then either.

Funny how when there were 4 seats at the trough, adding a fourth swine to the feeding frenzy that is the Champion's League wasn't a problem, but you add a 5th little piggy and the 1 in 4 chance that the filth, the scouse filth or the southern filth might miss out and all of a sudden FFP, with every reason under the sun for it's implementation but the actual truth.

Why the fuck don't they just come out and say it? Why don't they admit to moving the goalposts in order to keep their trotters in the swill of financial unfair money that has poured into the club for close to 20 years now? Why don't they admit they are the powerbrokers behind all the moves that hapless inept clueless wanderer Platini seems to be the point man on? Would it change anything? Would droves of their fans abandon the club because they found out they were this powerful? Their flock of mindless sheep fans went their for that exact reason in the first place, if anything they would gain more sycophantic saps who attach their personal success to the successes of the club they support.


Excellent post.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 3:56 pm
by Ted Hughes
miteeth aintmeone

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:37 pm
by Bianchi on Ice
I'm beginning to feel sorry for brendan rogers

nipped that one in the bud

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:41 pm
by Slim
Speaking of Brenda, did you notice his attempt to replicate the Hart dropping with Mignolet, except when Pellers came out and said that Hart needed a break and City had no No.1, that both keepers were just as capable, Brenda has come out and said Jones is his number one and Mignolet needs to reflect on the errors he's made.

It's like watching Da Vinci paint a masterpiece, claiming you can do just as good a job, then trying it with finger paints.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:45 pm
by Bianchi on Ice
Slim wrote:Speaking of Brenda, did you notice his attempt to replicate the Hart dropping with Mignolet, except when Pellers came out and said that Hart needed a break and City had no No.1, that both keepers were just as capable, Brenda has come out and said Jones is his number one and Mignolet needs to reflect on the errors he's made.

It's like watching Da Vinci paint a masterpiece, claiming you can do just as good a job, then trying it with finger paints.


He's said jones is his number one? pencils up the nose and pants on the head next.

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:59 pm
by Slim
Bianchi on Ice wrote:
Slim wrote:Speaking of Brenda, did you notice his attempt to replicate the Hart dropping with Mignolet, except when Pellers came out and said that Hart needed a break and City had no No.1, that both keepers were just as capable, Brenda has come out and said Jones is his number one and Mignolet needs to reflect on the errors he's made.

It's like watching Da Vinci paint a masterpiece, claiming you can do just as good a job, then trying it with finger paints.


He's said jones is his number one? pencils up the nose and pants on the head next.


When asked whether 32-year-old Jones was now his first-choice goalkeeper, Rodgers said: "Yes. I said to Simon it was for an indefinite period.


Yeah, he's had a bad run but FFS Jones over Mignolet?

Re: Brendan Rodgers

PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:48 pm
by Hazy2
Slim wrote:
Bianchi on Ice wrote:
Slim wrote:Speaking of Brenda, did you notice his attempt to replicate the Hart dropping with Mignolet, except when Pellers came out and said that Hart needed a break and City had no No.1, that both keepers were just as capable, Brenda has come out and said Jones is his number one and Mignolet needs to reflect on the errors he's made.

It's like watching Da Vinci paint a masterpiece, claiming you can do just as good a job, then trying it with finger paints.


He's said jones is his number one? pencils up the nose and pants on the head next.


When asked whether 32-year-old Jones was now his first-choice goalkeeper, Rodgers said: "Yes. I said to Simon it was for an indefinite period.


Yeah, he's had a bad run but FFS Jones over Mignolet?


Awaiting his payout 15 mill for the Scousers, notice Stevie G is saying nothing !