[center]
![Image](http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc311/ManCityFans/Managers-1.jpg)
King Kev wrote:Just a quick update as I know how much some of you love this table!
[center][/center]
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:10.Goater_Legend wrote:Yes he is in the MAN, the reason he is?, because before the Arsenal game yesterday I never felt City would lose with Mancini's tactics. I was that confident in Mancini and the boys, in my life time I can NEVER recall being 100% certain that we would come home form the Emirates/Highbury with something. When Hughes was here I always thought there was a big chance we would lose away in any game.
That to me is a sign of real progress, I think the Shiekh and Khaldoon have pulled off a master class bringing this man in, because if we don't finish 4th this year you can bet your blue arse we will next season.
A top manager and we are lucky to have him imo.
Do you feel 100% certain we will beat Villa and Spurs?
10.Goater_Legend wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:10.Goater_Legend wrote:Yes he is in the MAN, the reason he is?, because before the Arsenal game yesterday I never felt City would lose with Mancini's tactics. I was that confident in Mancini and the boys, in my life time I can NEVER recall being 100% certain that we would come home form the Emirates/Highbury with something. When Hughes was here I always thought there was a big chance we would lose away in any game.
That to me is a sign of real progress, I think the Shiekh and Khaldoon have pulled off a master class bringing this man in, because if we don't finish 4th this year you can bet your blue arse we will next season.
A top manager and we are lucky to have him imo.
Do you feel 100% certain we will beat Villa and Spurs?
Yes
Beefymcfc wrote:I think we should give him and Hughes another 12 months. Let Mancio sort out the defence in pre-season, square us away with his signings and let Hughes take over when we need the results.
MaineRoadMemories wrote:Going into a little more detail both Hughes and Mancini can take equal blame this season for missing out on a golden opportunity of getting Champions League Football.
Here's where we lost it according to me...
Hughes
- Aston Villa - D - creditable
- Wigan Athletic - D - annoying
- Fulham - D - terrible defending
- Birmingham City - D - good penalty save, awful attacking
- Burnley - D - shocking, shocking defending errors
- Liverpool D - bottled it when
- Hull City D - stupid Bullard.
Mancini
- Liverpool D - couldn't score
- Everton L - can't score
- U***d L - won't score
- Arsenal D - failed to have a shot on target
- Spurs L - bottled it and couldn't score
Fuck; just realised that shitty HULL CITY took 4 points off us this season. That's a joke; could of done with those 6 points.
Mancini isn't the man to get us to the top of the table and win trophies as he can't score against the top teams (9 man Chelsea aside).
Beefymcfc wrote:MaineRoadMemories wrote:Going into a little more detail both Hughes and Mancini can take equal blame this season for missing out on a golden opportunity of getting Champions League Football.
Here's where we lost it according to me...
Hughes
- Aston Villa - D - creditable
- Wigan Athletic - D - annoying
- Fulham - D - terrible defending
- Birmingham City - D - good penalty save, awful attacking
- Burnley - D - shocking, shocking defending errors
- Liverpool D - bottled it when
- Hull City D - stupid Bullard.
Mancini
- Liverpool D - couldn't score
- Everton L - can't score
- U***d L - won't score
- Arsenal D - failed to have a shot on target
- Spurs L - bottled it and couldn't score
Fuck; just realised that shitty HULL CITY took 4 points off us this season. That's a joke; could of done with those 6 points.
Mancini isn't the man to get us to the top of the table and win trophies as he can't score against the top teams (9 man Chelsea aside).
Weren''t we winning that before it was 9 men? The truth is, compared to most, we've had a great season and it's only now that the real recriminations can start. From your calculations we lost 12 points with Hughes (in 7) and 13 against Mancio (in 5) yet Mancio's were against the top clubs, not half arsed teams!
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Thoughts now on Mancini as the season comes to an end.
1) He should stay and be given the chance to bring his own players , to play to his preferred style with players he chooses and who suit that style.
2) Do I think he is the man? The answer still has to be don't know. I am still totally unsure but as I said let's have some stability and give him the next season to find out. I am still searching for real signs that he is the man but just cannot find them.As I said in a previous thread I can see that he has improved the organisation of the defence.Partly that's down to the zonal approach ( which I don't like)at set pieces and partly to a more cautious overall approach but at the same time I do think it's been at a cost as the overall team and specifically attacking play has suffered. And please don't answer that by pointing out some of the attacking play against Chelsea ( 2nd half) , Burnley , Brum. We have some great attacking players and when we get ahead and the opposition get it wrong we can rip through them but when the oppos get it right we really struggle. ( Stoke x3 , Everton x2, scum,Lpool, Arse,Spurs,Hull.Sunderland 1st half)
3) I remain to be convinced that his " style" will work here or that he has the man management or motivational skills required. The key points ,which those who believe Mancini IS the man hang their hat on, are his record in Italy and that this isn't his team.I can accept that to a point and that's why I think he needs to be given more time.His transfer policy ( ins and outs) this summer will be fascinating.
4) Tactically I believe the jury is out. Occasional things have suggested he is ok but some also say the opposite and particularly recent substitutions have been questionable.
Fidel Castro wrote:This was our most important game in yonks, yet we didn't create a single chance. At home. The fact our best player was Sunderland's 3rd choice goalie says enough. Don't know what the answer is, but it's not Mancini cos I am convinced we wouldn't have been worse off at this moment in time with the welsh rag cunt Hughes in charge. Tonights performance was a fuclin farce, thanks a lot you bunch of pricks
Bluez wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:This was our most important game in yonks, yet we didn't create a single chance. At home. The fact our best player was Sunderland's 3rd choice goalie says enough. Don't know what the answer is, but it's not Mancini cos I am convinced we wouldn't have been worse off at this moment in time with the welsh rag cunt Hughes in charge. Tonights performance was a fuclin farce, thanks a lot you bunch of pricks
I didn't think we were that bad, Gomes pulled off a couple of really good saves, if any of those had gone in things could have been very different
Fidel Castro wrote:Bluez wrote:Fidel Castro wrote:This was our most important game in yonks, yet we didn't create a single chance. At home. The fact our best player was Sunderland's 3rd choice goalie says enough. Don't know what the answer is, but it's not Mancini cos I am convinced we wouldn't have been worse off at this moment in time with the welsh rag cunt Hughes in charge. Tonights performance was a fuclin farce, thanks a lot you bunch of pricks
I didn't think we were that bad, Gomes pulled off a couple of really good saves, if any of those had gone in things could have been very different
I can remember one great save by Gomes. And that was cos Bale decided to have a pop at his own goal using his cock
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Thoughts now on Mancini as the season comes to an end.
1) He should stay and be given the chance to bring his own players , to play to his preferred style with players he chooses and who suit that style.
2) Do I think he is the man? The answer still has to be don't know. I am still totally unsure but as I said let's have some stability and give him the next season to find out. I am still searching for real signs that he is the man but just cannot find them.As I said in a previous thread I can see that he has improved the organisation of the defence.Partly that's down to the zonal approach ( which I don't like)at set pieces and partly to a more cautious overall approach but at the same time I do think it's been at a cost as the overall team and specifically attacking play has suffered. And please don't answer that by pointing out some of the attacking play against Chelsea ( 2nd half) , Burnley , Brum. We have some great attacking players and when we get ahead and the opposition get it wrong we can rip through them but when the oppos get it right we really struggle. ( Stoke x3 , Everton x2, scum,Lpool, Arse,Spurs,Hull.Sunderland 1st half)
3) I remain to be convinced that his " style" will work here or that he has the man management or motivational skills required. The key points ,which those who believe Mancini IS the man hang their hat on, are his record in Italy and that this isn't his team.I can accept that to a point and that's why I think he needs to be given more time.His transfer policy ( ins and outs) this summer will be fascinating.
4) Tactically I believe the jury is out. Occasional things have suggested he is ok but some also say the opposite and particularly recent substitutions have been questionable.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: carolina-blue, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], salford city and 299 guests