Alioune DVToure wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:or less untrue.
Possibly, I dunno. I've only ever read his 'next' posts. What I do know is that this place gets messy when everyone starts with the 'Citier than though' finger-pointing inquisition.
I think most people here get a bit paranoid because they are far away and don't go to matches, something they criticise the filth for on a regular basis. It is interesting.
@BB, I think to say we have been "awful" is a bit strong. Reading. Bury and Stockport have been awful. City have played some excellent football in most games, admittedly not for 90 minutes even on a good day, but then who does? Have a look at the goals we have scored and some of the pass-and-move has been excellent.
Only on two or three occasions can I say the effort has not been there (Southampton away, second half at tottenham the other week). WBA away, Fulham away and Naaridge away were three performances better than anything we saw last season in terms of determination in the face of difficult odds.
To give you the benefit of the doubt (and why not), I think you are trying to say they've been "awful" relative to the way that group of players should be playing. But that is your opinion obviously. I happen to disagree but then I am not setting myself up as a mouthpiece for tens of thousands of Blues, am I? ;-)
Your right leg I like; I've got nothing against your right leg. The trouble is neither have you.